Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2014, 22(4):16-29 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.443

Will the Financial Crisis Become a Milestone in the Development of Methodology of Economics?

Lukáš Kovanda
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Národohospodářská fakulta (Lukas.Kovanda@seznam.cz).

It has been widely accepted that philosophers of science wrote a "swansong" for positivism during the second half of the 20th century. Milton Friedman and Paul Samuelson, major contributors in the field of economic methodology at the time, the argument goes, never reflected the demise. Therefore, positivist roots are still to be found in influential theoretical concepts developed by mainstream economists. Specifically, I present the hypothesis of rational expectations and the theory of efficient markets as two significant outcomes of a "high tide" of positivist thinking in economics. However, quite a large number of scholars currently share the view that the two concepts contributed in a non-negligible manner to the development leading to the financial crisis culminating in 2008 and 2009 and should be replaced by behavioural or other approaches. The article thus asks, in quite a novel way, if the crisis - seen by many as an empirical rejection of both the concepts - can also be seen as a milestone in the development of methodology of economics.

Keywords: methodology of economics, positivism, Milton Friedman, Paul Samuelson, rational expectations, theory of efficient markets, financial crisis, behavioural economics
JEL classification: B20, B30, B31, B40, B41, B50

Published: August 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kovanda, L. (2014). Will the Financial Crisis Become a Milestone in the Development of Methodology of Economics? Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 22(4), 16-29. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.443
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BEZEMER, D. 2009. No One Saw This Coming: Understanding Financial Crisis Through Accounting Models. 2009, MPRA, studie č. 15892.
    2. BIS, 2001. 71st Annual Report. Basilej: Bank for International Settlements, 2001.
    3. BOETTKE, P et al. 2006. Where Economics and Philosophy Meet: Review of the Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy with Responses from the Authors. Economic Journal. 2006, roč. 116 (červen), s. F306-F325. Go to original source...
    4. CALDENTEY, E.; VERNENGO, M. 2010. Modern finance, methodology and the global crisis. Real-world economics review. 2010, č. 52, s. 69-81.
    5. CFA Institute 2013, Ethical and Professional Standards and Quantitative Methods. CFA Program Curriculum, Level 1, Volume 1. Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
    6. CODDINGTON, A. 1972. Positive Economics. The Canadian Journal of Economics. 1972, roč. 5, č. 1, s. 1-15. Go to original source...
    7. COLANDER, D. 2005. The future of economics: the appropriately educated in pursuit of the knowable. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2005, roč. 29, s. 927-41. Go to original source...
    8. COLANDER, D. a kol. 2010. The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of Academic Economics. In: Kolb, R. W. (ed.) Lessons from the Financial Crisis: Causes, Consequences, and Our Economic Future. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Go to original source...
    9. CROTTY J. 2011. The Realism of Assumptions Does Matter: Why Keynes-Minsky Theory Must Replace Efficient Market Theory as the Guide to Financial Regulation Policy. 2011, UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2011-05.
    10. DE BONDT, W.; THALER, R. 1985. Does the stock market overreact? Journal of Finance. 1985, roč. 40, č. 3, s. 793-805. Go to original source...
    11. ESTRELLA, A.; FUHRER, J. 2002. Dynamic Inconsistencies: Counterfactual Implications of a Class of Rational-Expectations Models. American Economic Review. 2002, roč. 92, č. 4, s. 1013-28. Go to original source...
    12. FAMA, E. 1970. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance. 1970, roč. 25, č. 2, s. 383-417. Go to original source...
    13. FOSTER, J; METCALFE, S. 2012. Economic emergence: An evolutionary economic perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2012, roč. 82, s. 420-32. Go to original source...
    14. FRIEDMAN, M. 1953. The Methodology of Positive Economics. In: Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1953.
    15. GERTCHEV, N. 2007. A Critique of Adaptive and Rational Expectations. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2007, roč. 10, s. 313-29. Go to original source...
    16. GINTIS, H. 2006. A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2006, roč. 30, s. 1-61. Go to original source...
    17. GOWDY J. 2010. Behavioral Economics, Neuroeconomics, and Climate Change Policy : Baseline Review. 2010, výzkumná zpráva Garrisonova institutu.
    18. HANDS, D. W. 2001. Reflection Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2001. Go to original source...
    19. HOWDEN, D. 2010. Knowledge shifts and the business cycle: When boom turns to bust. Review of Austrian Economics. 2010, č. 23, s. 165-82. Go to original source...
    20. JENSEN, M. 1978. Some Anomalous Evidence Regarding Market Efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics. 1978, roč. 6, č. 2/3, s. 95-101. Go to original source...
    21. KAHNEMAN, D.; TVERSKY A. 1979. Prospective theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econome-trica. 1979, roč. 47, s. 263-91. Go to original source...
    22. KOVANDA, L. 2009. Příběh dokonalé bouře a hovory (nejen) s laureáty Nobelovy ceny o finanční krizi. Praha : Mediacop, 2009. ISBN 978-80-254-6403-8.
    23. KOVANDA, L. 2012. Společenské důsledky monetárních šoků. In: Bankovnictví v proměnách času: Sborník textů k 20 letům České bankovní asociace. Praha : Česká bankovní asociace, 2012.
    24. KOVANDA, 2013a. Finanční krize a metodologie ekonomie. Dizertační práce (školitel: Pavlík, J.). Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.
    25. KOVANDA, L. 2013b. Taktické omyly ekonomů rakouské školy při "dobývání ortodoxie" Politická ekonomie. 2013, roč. 61, č. 3, s. 411-27. Go to original source...
    26. KOVANDA, L. Přijato k publikaci. Složila finanční krize "labutí píseň" pozitivistické ekonomii? Teorie vědy.
    27. LAIBSON, D; ZECKHAUSER, R. 1998. Amos Tversky and the Ascent of Behavioral Economics. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1998, roč. 16, s. 7-47. Go to original source...
    28. LEWIN, S. 1996. Economics and Psychology: Lessons For Our Own Day From the Early Twentieth Century. Journal of Economic Literature. 1996, roč. 34, č. 3, s. 1293-323.
    29. LUX, T; WESTERHOFF, F 2009. Economics crisis. Nature Physics. 2009, roč. 5, č. 1, s. 2-3. Go to original source...
    30. MACHLUP F 1951. Schumpeter's Economic Methodology. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1951, roč. 33, č. 2, s. 145-51. Go to original source...
    31. MERTON, R. 1998. Applications of Option-Pricing Theory: Twenty-Five Years Later. American Economic Review. 1998, roč. 88, č. 3, s. 323-49.
    32. PFOUTS, R. W. 1967. Artistic Goals, Scientific Method and Economics. Southern Economic Journal. 1967, roč. 33, č. 4, s. 457-67. Go to original source...
    33. PRECHTER, R., Jr. 2001. Unconscious herding behavior as the psychological basis of financial market trends and patterns. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets. 2001, roč. 2, č. 3, s. 120-25. Go to original source...
    34. SAMUELSON, P 2006. Předmluva ke knize Louis Bachelier's Theory of Speculation: The Origins of Modern Finance. Princeton a Oxford : Princeton University Press, 2006.
    35. SARGENT, T 1993. Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1993. Go to original source...
    36. SCHABAS, M. 1986. An Assessement of the Scientific Standing of Economics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (sv. 1). 1986, s. 298-306. Go to original source...
    37. SEWELL, M. 2011. History of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. 2011, UCL Department of Computer Science, výzkumná zpráva č. RN/11/04.
    38. SHARPE, W. 1964. Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance. 1964, roč. 19, č. 3, s. 425-42. Go to original source...
    39. SHILLER, R. 2011. The Sickness Beneath the Slump. New York Times, 12. 6. 2011.
    40. SHIONOYA, Y. 1990. Instrumentalism in Schumpeter's Economic Methodology. History of Political Economy. 1990, roč. 22, č. 2, s. 187-222. Go to original source...
    41. SHIONOYA, Y 2005. The Soul of the German Historical School: Methodological Essays on Schmoller, Weber and Schumpeter. New York : Springer, 2005.
    42. SHOSTAK, F. 1997. In Defense of Fundamental Analysis: A Critique of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. Review of Austrian Economics. 1997, roč. 10, č. 2, s. 27-45. Go to original source...
    43. SULLIVAN, E.; WEITHERS, T. 1991. Louis Bachelier: The Father of Modern Option Pricing Theory. Journal of Economic Education. 1991, roč. 22, č. 2, s. 165-71. Go to original source...
    44. ŠÍMA, J. 2004. Praxeology as Law & Economics. Journal of Libertarian Studies. 2004, roč. 18, č. 2, s. 73-89.
    45. TALEB, N. N. 2011. Černá labuť. Praha a Litomyšl : Paseka, 2011.
    46. TALEB, N. N. 2013. Zrádná nahodilost. Praha a Litomyšl : Paseka, 2013.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content