Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2015, 23(2):22-39 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.468

Selected Approaches to Measurement of National Competitiveness and the Results of Visegrad Group in Years 2007-2014

Marta Nečadová
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Fakulta podnikohospodářská, katedra mikroekonomie (necadova@vse.cz).

The first objective of this paper is to briefly describe and compare the methodology of the two best known international rankings of competitiveness (World Competitiveness Yearbook and The Global Competitiveness Report). The method of construction of these scoreboards (proportion of hard and soft data, form of their aggregation, choice of respondents, etc.) does not make it possible to find a satisfactory answer to the question whether national competitiveness is objectively measurable. The second goal of this paper is to analyse the V4 results in these rankings. According to the GCR all the V4 are most successful in indicators called Efficiency enhancers. The low trust in the political representation and its activities is typical for the V4 countries. This negative attitude is projected into negative evaluation of the quality of public institutions and public administration.

Keywords: National Competitiveness, Visegrad group, World Competitiveness Yearbook, Global Competitiveness Report, Global Competitiveness Index
JEL classification: E60, F00, F60, F62

Published: April 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nečadová, M. (2015). Selected Approaches to Measurement of National Competitiveness and the Results of Visegrad Group in Years 2007-2014. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia23(2), 22-39. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.468
Download citation

References

  1. BREŇOVÁ, L.; NEČADOVÁ, M.; SOUKUP, J. 2012. Impact of the New Economy on the Competitiveness of the Visegrad Group Countries (with an emphasis on the Czech Republic). Slaný: Melandrium, 2012. 82 p. ISBN 978-80-86175-78-2.
  2. DELGADO, M.; KETELS, CH.; PORTER, M. E.; STERN, S. 2012. The Determinants of national Competitiveness. Working Paper 18249. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. 47p., http://www.nber.org/papers/w18249. Go to original source...
  3. EZEALA-HARRISON, F. 2005. On the competing notions of international competitiveness, Advances in Competitiveness Research. 2005. Dostupné z: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Advances-in-Competitiveness-Research/138408289.html.
  4. FMV VŠE, 2014. Česko si v žebříčku konkurenceschopnosti polepšilo o devět míst. Tisková zpráva. VŠE, 3.9. 2014. Dostupné z: http://www.vse.cz/media/TZ_VSE_Konkurenceschopnost_20140903.pdf.
  5. IMD, 2007-2014. World Competitiveness Yearbook. IMD, 2007-2014. Dostupné z: WWW.IMD. ORG nebo z: https://www-worldcompetitiveness-com.ezproxy.vse.cz/OnLine/App/Index.htm.
  6. KLVAČOVÁ, E. 2008a. Různé cesty ke konkurenceschopnosti: EU versus USA. Praha: Professional Publishing, 2008. ISBN 978-80-86946-84-9.
  7. KLVAČOVÁ, E.; MALÝ, J. 2008b. Domnělé a skutečné bariéry konkurenceschopnosti EU a ČR. Praha: Vzdělávací středisko na podporu demokracie, 2008. 100 p., ISBN 978-80-903122-8-9.
  8. KLVAČOVÁ, E. MALÝ; J., MRÁČEK; K., DOSTÁLOVÁ, I. 2008c. Fenomén dobývání renty a jeho vliv na české veřejné finance. Praha: PROFESSIONAL PUBLISHING, 2008, 270 p. ISBN 978-8086946-75-7.
  9. KRUGMAN, P. R. 1994. Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs. 1994, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 28-44. Dostupné z: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~uctpvhg/ECON1005/Readings/Krug%20comp.pdf. Go to original source...
  10. KRUGMAN, P. R. 1996. Making sense of the competitiveness debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 1996, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp.17-25. Go to original source...
  11. MALÝ, J.; WAWROSZ, P.; MRÁČEK, K.; DOSTÁLOVÁ, I. 2011. Globalizace integrace a české národní zájmy. Praha: PROFESSIONAL PUBLISHING, 2011. 247 p. ISBN 978-80-7431-061-4.
  12. NEČADOVÁ, M.; SOUKUP, J. 2013. Kontroverzní pojem národní konkurenceschopnost a výsledky zemí V4 v mezinárodních žebříčcích konkurenceschopnosti (2007-2012). Politická ekonomie. 2013, Vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 583-604. Go to original source...
  13. PLCHOVÁ, B. 2011. Konkurenceschopnost v mezinárodním prostředí. Vybrané aspekty postavení nových členských zemí EU. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia. 2011, Vol. 19, No 2, pp. 3-27. Go to original source...
  14. ROJÍČEK, M. 2012. Vliv globalizace na fungování mezinárodního obchodu. Politická ekonomie. 2012, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 187-207. Go to original source...
  15. VINTROVÁ, R. 2010a. Dopady recese na ekonomickou pozici a konkurenceschopnost zemí EU-5. Ekonomické listy. 2010, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 3-15.
  16. VINTROVÁ, R. 2010b. Interpretační omezení HDP a alternativní ukazatele. Working paper No. 6/2010. Praha: Centrum výzkumu konkurenční schopnosti české ekonomiky, 2010. 43 p. ISSN 1801-4496.
  17. VINTROVÁ, R. 2012. Změny mezinárodní ekonomické pozice ČR v období recese. Ekonomické listy. 2012, Vol.3, No. 2, pp. 20-36.
  18. WEF, 2007-2014. The Global Competitiveness Report. WEF, 2007-2014. Dostupné z: www. weforum.org/issues/global-competitiveness.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.