European Financial and Accounting Journal 2015, 10(3):45-61 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.145

Sixth Method as a Simplified Measurement for SMEs?

Veronika Solilová1, Danuše Nerudová2
1 Veronika Solilová; Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Accounting and Taxation, Mendel University, Zemedelska 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; <ritve@email.cz>.
2 Danuše Nerudová; Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Accounting and Taxation, Mendel University, Zemedelska 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; <d.nerudova@seznam.cz>.

In December 2014, OECD issued a Discussion Draft on Transfer Pricing aspects of cross-border commodity transactions through BEPS action 10, where the adoption of the sixth method in the form of the quoted commodity price and its adjustments were primarily driven as a starting point for transfer pricing purpose. In this paper the analysis of the proposed sixth method and the experience with the sixth method in Argentina were used for the consideration whether this method can be used as simplified measurement for SMEs. SMEs are facing tax obstacles mainly in the area of the international taxation which impede in cross border transactions and internationalization of SMEs. One of tax obstacles represent transfer pricing. Its costs can be disproportionately large for SMEs in comparison to LSEs. Moreover, SMEs are not able to bear the high administrative burden to comply with the transfer pricing rules as they do not posses the sufficient human and economic capital. Based on the results of the research, we can concluded, that there are a lot of questions related to the proposed sixth method, notwitstanding, it has a potential to be a new method for SMEs for they need to face lower tax administrative burden in the area of transfer pricing issues.

Keywords: BEPS, Simplified measurements, Sixth method, SMEs, Transfer pricing
JEL classification: H25, H26

Published: October 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Solilová, V., & Nerudová, D. (2015). Sixth Method as a Simplified Measurement for SMEs? European Financial and Accounting Journal10(3), 45-61. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.145
Download citation

References

  1. Amadeus Database, Bureau Van Dijk.
  2. Buus, T.,Brada, J., 2008. O vlastnostech metod stanovení transferových cen. Český finanční a účetní časopis 3, 39-55. Go to original source...
  3. Chittenden, F., Michaelas, N., Poutziouris, P., 2000. Small Business Taxation: An Agenda for Growth, EDC: Manchester Business School.
  4. Cressy, R., 2000. Tax, Assistance, Compliance and the Performance of the Smaller Business. Research Report to the Federation of Small Business.
  5. European Commission, 2010. Internationalization of European SMEs. Directorate- General for Enterprise and Industry.
  6. European Commission, 2007. Simplified Tax Compliance Procedures for SMEs - Final Report of the Expert Group. EC Publishing, Brussels.
  7. Income Tax Law No. 25.784 of Argentina
  8. Nerudová, D., 2005. Harmonizace daňových system v zemí Evropské unie, Praha: ASPI, pp. 236. Daňová řada. ISBN 80-7357-142-0.
  9. Nerudová, D., Bohušová, H., Svoboda, P., Široký, J., 2009. Harmonizace účetních standardů pro malé a střední podniky. Praha, Wolters Kluwer.
  10. OECD, 2010. Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations.
  11. OECD, 2014. BEPS Action 10: Discussion Draft on Transfer Pricing aspects of cross-border commodity transactions.
  12. Sandford, C., 1995. Tax Compliance Costs - measurement and policy. Institute for Fiscal Studies, Bath.
  13. Van Herksen, M., 2009. Introduction. In Bakker, A., Obuoforibo, B. Transfer pricing and customs valuation. Two worlds to tax as one. IBFD.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.