European Financial and Accounting Journal 2015, 10(4):45-65 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.149

The Effect of 2011 Revised Code of Corporate Governance on Pricing Behaviour of Nigerian Auditors

Salau O. Abdulmalik1, Ayoib Che Ahmad2
1 Salau O. Abdulmalik; Research Student; School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah Darul Aman, 06010 UUM Sintok, Malaysia, .
2 Ayoib Che Ahmad; Professor; School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah Darul Aman, 06010 UUM Sintok, Malaysia.

The paper examines the extent which risk management committee and corporate governance committee predict audit fees in Nigeria. We employed random panel data (unbalance) regression analysis to establish whether risk management committee and corporate governance committee affect audit fees. We obtained the data used for this study from the annual reports of public listed companies on the Nigerian Stock Exchange for the periods 2008-2013. Our results indicate a positive relationship between establishment of risk management committee and audit fees while the establishment of corporate governance committee has an insignificant relationship with audit fees. The findings provide evidence to inform policy makers and corporation in Nigeria on how their governance structure affects audit fees. Firms with a strong governance structure have the incentive to improve the quality of their financial report. Therefore, such firms will increase the scope of auditor's work. This result has implication for policy makers because it suggests that corporate governance mechanisms are important in ensuring a quality audit. The paper contributes to literature on audit pricing in the context of the Nigerian audit market that is currently under-researched. The study provides additional theoretical insights by investigating the impact of risk management committee and corporate governance committee on audit fees, which to the best of the researcher's knowledge, have not been tested in the audit fees model.

Keywords: Audit fees, Corporate governance committee, Risk management committee
JEL classification: M42

Published: December 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Abdulmalik, S.O., & Ahmad, A.C. (2015). The Effect of 2011 Revised Code of Corporate Governance on Pricing Behaviour of Nigerian Auditors. European Financial and Accounting Journal10(4), 45-65. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.149
Download citation

References

  1. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., Raghunandan, K. 2003. The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing 2, 17-32. Go to original source...
  2. Adelopo, I., 2011. Voluntary disclosure practices amongst listed companies in Nigeria. Advances in Accounting 2, 338-345. Go to original source...
  3. Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C. R., 1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 3, 377-397. Go to original source...
  4. Ahmad, A. C., Houghton, K. A., Yusof, N. Z. M., 2006. The Malaysian market for audit services: Ethnicity, multinational companies and auditor choice. Managerial Auditing Journal 7, 702-723. Go to original source...
  5. Ahmed, K., Goyal, M. K., 2005. A comparative study of pricing of audit services in emerging economies. International Journal of Auditing 2, 103-116. Go to original source...
  6. Aswadi Abdul Wahab, E., Mat Zain, M., James, K. and Haron, H., 2009. Institutional investors, political connection and audit quality in Malaysia. Accounting Research Journal 2, 167-195. Go to original source...
  7. Bathala, C. T., Rao, R. P., 1995. The determinants of board composition: An agency theory perspective. Managerial and decision economics 1, 59-69. Go to original source...
  8. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., 2009. The Audit Committee Oversight Process. Contemporary Accounting Research 1, 65-122. Go to original source...
  9. Berle, A., Means, G., 1932. The modern corporate and private property. McMillian, New York, NY.
  10. Bliss, M. A., 2011. Does CEO duality constrain board independence? Some evidence from audit pricing. Accounting & Finance 2, 361-380. Go to original source...
  11. Boo, E. F., Sharma, D., 2008. Effect of regulatory oversight on the association between internal governance characteristics and audit fees. Accounting & Finance 1, 51-71. Go to original source...
  12. Bromilow, C. L., Berlin, B., 2005. Audit Committee Effectiveness. Corporate Board, 16.
  13. Carcello, J. V., Neal, T. L., 2003. Audit committee independence and disclosure: Choice for financially distressed firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review 4, 289-299. Go to original source...
  14. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., Riley Jr, R. A., 2002. Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 3, 365-384. Go to original source...
  15. Carson, E., 2002. Factors associated with the development of board subcommittees. Corporate Governance: An International Review 1, 4-18. Go to original source...
  16. Chan, P., Ezzamel, M., Gwilliam, D., 1993. Determinants of audit fees for quoted UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 6, 765-786. Go to original source...
  17. Cohen, J. R., Hanno, D. M., 2000. Auditors' consideration of corporate governance and management control philosophy in preplanning and planning judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 2, 133-146. Go to original source...
  18. DeFond, M., Zhang, J., 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2, 275-326. Go to original source...
  19. Desender, K. A., 2009. The Relationship Between the Ownership Structure and Board Effectiveness. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business Working Papers, 9-105. Go to original source...
  20. Firth, M., 1985. An Analysis of Audit Fees and their Determinants in New- Zealand. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 2, 23-37.
  21. Francis, J.R. and Simon, D.T., 1987. A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the US audit market. Accounting Review, 145-157.
  22. Goodwin-Stewart, J., Kent, P., 2006. Relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics and internal audit. Accounting & Finance 3, 387-404. Go to original source...
  23. Gorton, G., & Schmid, F., 1996. Universal banking and the performance of German corporations. NBER working paper, 5453. Go to original source...
  24. Haniffa, R., Che Ahmad, A., Houghton, K. A., Zalina Mohamad Yusof, N., 2006. The Malaysian market for audit services: ethnicity, multinational companies and auditor choice. Managerial Auditing Journal 7, 702-723. Go to original source...
  25. Henderson, B., Kaplan, S. E., 2000. An Examination of Audit Report Lag for Banks: A Panel Data Approach. Auditing: A Journal Of Practice & Theory 2, 159. Go to original source...
  26. Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 4, 305-360. Go to original source...
  27. Joshi, P., AL-Bastaki, H., 2000. Determinants of audit fees: evidence from the companies listed in Bahrain. International Journal of Auditing 2, 129-138. Go to original source...
  28. Kane, G.D. and Velury, U., 2004. The role of institutional ownership in the market for auditing services: an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research 9, 976-983. Go to original source...
  29. Knechel, W. R., Willekens, M., 2006. The role of risk management and governance in determining audit demand. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 9-10, 1344-1367. Go to original source...
  30. Krishnan, G., Visvanathan, G., 2009. Do auditors price audit committee's expertise? The case of accounting versus non accounting financial experts. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 1, 115-144. Go to original source...
  31. Menon, K., Williams, J. D., 1994. The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 2, 121-139. Go to original source...
  32. Mitra, S., Hossain, M., Deis, D., 2007. The empirical relationship between ownership characteristics and audit fees. Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting 3, 257-285. Go to original source...
  33. Mustapha, M., Che Ahmad, A., 2011. Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal 5, 419-436. Go to original source...
  34. Naser, K., Nuseibeh, R., 2008. Determinants of audit fees: empirical evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Commerce and Management 3, 239-254. Go to original source...
  35. O'Sullivan, N., 2000. The impact of board composition and ownership on audit quality: Evidence from large UK companies. The British Accounting Review 4, 397-414. Go to original source...
  36. Ofo, N., 2012. Draft Revised Code of Corporate Governance for Banks in Nigeria: Bringing Independent Directors on Board.
  37. Okike, E., 2004. Management of crisis: The response of the auditing profession in Nigeria to the challenge to its legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 5, 705-730. Go to original source...
  38. Okike, E. N. M., 2007. Corporate governance in Nigeria: The status quo. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2, 173-193 Go to original source...
  39. Pong, C. M., Whittington, G., 1994. The determinants of audit fees: Some empirical models. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 8, 1071-1095. Proshare News, 2013. Available from: <http://www.proshareng.com/news/19093>. Go to original source...
  40. Ronen, J., 2002. Policy reforms in the aftermath of accounting scandals, Editorial, Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, pp. 281-286. Available from: <http://eserv.uum.edu.my/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=8791789&site=ehost-live≻ope=site>. Go to original source...
  41. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W., 1997. A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance 2, 737-783. Go to original source...
  42. Simunic, D. A., 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 1, 161-190. Go to original source...
  43. Turley, S., Zaman, M., 2007. Audit committee effectiveness: informal processes and behavioural effects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 5, 765-788. Go to original source...
  44. Tsui, J.S., Jaggi, B. and Gul, F.A., 2001. CEO domination, growth opportunities, and their impact on audit fees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 3, 189-208. Go to original source...
  45. Yatim, P., Kent, P., Clarkson, P., 2006. Governance structures, ethnicity, and audit fees of Malaysian listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal 7, 757-782. Go to original source...
  46. Zaman, M., Hudaib, M., Haniffa, R., 2011. Corporate governance quality, audit fees and non-audit services fees. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 1/2, 165-197. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.