European Financial and Accounting Journal 2016, 11(1):5-22 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.150

The Performance Indicators for The State Health-related Expenditures: Lessons from OECD

Jakub Haas1, Eva Gajdošová2
1 Jakub Haas; Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic, Public Budgets Section, Healthcare and Public Health Insurance Unit, Letenská 15, 118 10 Prague 1, Czech Republic <Jakub.Haas@mfcr.cz>.
2 Eva Gajdošová; University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of Finance and Accounting, Department of Public Finance, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czech Republic, <xgaje00@vse.cz >.

The paper deals with the weakness of the Czech public finance - the lack of performance information. The budgeting in the Czech Republic still relies on the incremental method and omits using of performance indicators. On the contrary, most of the OECD member countries has adopted some type of performance budgeting. The paper focuses on the healthcare expenditures of the Czech state budget, analyses long-term experience with performance budgeting in the U.S.A., Australia and New Zealand. It also identifies opportunities and suggests the specific quantitative performance indicators for suitable programmes and organisations of the Ministry of Health.

Keywords: Budgeting, Healthcare, Performance indicators
JEL classification: H61, I18

Published: March 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Haas, J., & Gajdošová, E. (2016). The Performance Indicators for The State Health-related Expenditures: Lessons from OECD. European Financial and Accounting Journal11(1), 5-22. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.150
Download citation

References

  1. Australian Government department of Health, 2014. Australian Government 2014- 15 Health Portfolio Budget Statements - Department Outcomes. Available from: <https://health.gov.au/internet/budget/publishing.nsf/Content/2014-2015_Health _PBS>. [24 March 2015].
  2. Doran, G. T., 1981. There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives. Management Review (AMA FORUM) 70 (11).
  3. Government of the Czech Republic, 2006. Resolution of the Government of the Czech Republic dated July 12, 2006 no. 859 to implement projects for the ICRC Brno and to secure its financing, Praha.
  4. Haas, J., Gajdošová, E., 2015. The Quantitative Performance Indicators and Targets for Financing Healthcare from the State Budget - Challenge for the Czech Republic. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance, Prague.
  5. Ministry of Health, New Zealand, 2014. Statement of Intent 2014 to 2018 Ministry of Health, Wellington.
  6. Ministry of Healthcare of the Czech Republic (MoH), 2014. Annual Review 2014, Praha.
  7. OECD, 2007. Performance Budgeting in OECD Countries. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  8. OECD, 2015. Fiscal Sustainability of Health Systems: Bridging Health and Finance Perspectives. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  9. Ochrana, F., 2003. Veřejná volba a řízení veřejných výdajů. Ekopress, Praha.
  10. Pidd, M., 2012. Measuring the Performance of Public Services. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Go to original source...
  11. Robinson, M., 2011. Performance-based Budgeting, Manual, CLEAR Training material. Available from: <www.theclearinitiative.org/PDFs/CLEAR_PB_Manual.pdf>. [25 March 2015].
  12. Robinson, M., Brumby, J., 2005. Does Performance Budgeting Work? IMF Working Paper, WP/05/210, Washington. Go to original source...
  13. Robinson, M., Last D., 2009. A Basic Model of Performance-Based Budgeting IMF Technical Notes and Manuals. Fiscal Affair Department, Washington. Go to original source...
  14. Schick, A., 2007. Performance Budgeting and Accrual Budgeting: Decision Rules or Analytic Tools. OECD Journal of Budgeting 2, 109-138. Go to original source...
  15. The Open Budget Survey, 2015. Results by Country - Czech Republic. Available from: <http://internationalbudget.org/opening-budgets/open-budget-initiative/open-budget-survey/country-info/?country=cz>. [25 October 2015].
  16. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2014. Annual Performance Report and Performance Plan - Fiscal year 2015, Washington.
  17. Young, R. D., 2003. Performance-Based Budget Systems, Public Policy and Practice. USC Institute for Public Service and Policy Research, University of South Carolina.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.