Prague Economic Papers 2015, 24(4):452-472 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.547

Directed Technical Change, Technology Adoption and the Resource Curse Hypothesis

George Adu
Department of Economics, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana (gadu.cass@knust.edu.gh).

This paper analyses the effect of asymmetry in factor endowments between resourcerich and resource-poor countries on equilibrium bias of technology development and adoption possibilities. First, we show that the bias in equilibrium technology in the resource-poor North is determined by its relative abundance of human capital and physical capital. Secondly, we show that the equilibrium bias in technology in the resource-abundant South is dependent positively (negatively) on the relative abundance (scarcity) of skilled (unskilled) labour and the relative abundance (scarcity) of physical (natural) capital in the North. This force is dampened by the relative scarcity of skilled labour and physical capital in the South. These forces drive wage inequality, high cost of capital and skill technology mismatch in the South, all of which are bad for growth. These effects cumulatively explain part of the observed differences in growth performance between resource-rich and resource-poor countries.

Keywords: human capital, directed technical change, directed technology adoption, natural capital, physical capital, North, South
JEL classification: O31, O33, O41, Q33

Published: January 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Adu, G. (2015). Directed Technical Change, Technology Adoption and the Resource Curse Hypothesis. Prague Economic Papers24(4), 452-472. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.547
Download citation

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. (1998), "Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality." The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 113, No. 4, pp. 1055-1090, http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355398555838 Go to original source...
  2. Acemoglu, D. (2002), "Directed Technical Change." The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 781-809. Go to original source...
  3. Acemoglu, D. (2009), Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton University Press.
  4. Acemoglu, D., Zilibotti, F. (2001), "Productivity Differences." The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 2, pp. 563-606, http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/00335530151144104 Go to original source...
  5. Acemoglu, D., Gancia, G., Zilibotti, F. (2012), "Competing Engines of Growth: Innovation and Standardization." Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 147, No. 2, pp. 570-601, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2010.09.001 Go to original source...
  6. Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U. (2012), "Intellectual Property Rights Policy, Competition and Innovation." Journal of European Economic Association, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01053.x Go to original source...
  7. Afonso, O., Alves, R. H. (2008), "Can North-South Trade Regime Explain Intra and Inter-Country Productivity Differences?" International Trade and Economic Development, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 561-595, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638190802250365 Go to original source...
  8. Afonso, O. (2012), "Scale-Independent North-South Trade Effects on the TechnologicalKnowledge Bias on Wage Inequality." Review of World Economies, Vol. 148, No. 1, pp. 181-207, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10290-011-0109-7 Go to original source...
  9. Aghion, P., Howitt, P. (2009), The Economics of Growth. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  10. Aghion, P., Howitt, P. (1992), "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction." Econometrica, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 323-351, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2951599 Go to original source...
  11. Barro, R. J., Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997), "Technological Diffusion, Convergence and Growth." Journal of Economic Growth, No. 2, pp. 1-27. Go to original source...
  12. Copeland, B. R., Taylor, M. S. (1994), "North-South Trade and the Environment." The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, No. 3, pp. 755-787, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2118421 Go to original source...
  13. Di Maria, C., Valente, S. (2008), "Hicks Meets Hotelling: The Direction of Technical Change in Capital-Resource Economies." Journal of Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 691-717, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X08004567 Go to original source...
  14. Gancia, G., Bonfiglioli, A. (2008), "North-South Trade and Directed Technical Change." Journal of International Economics, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 276-295, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.03.010 Go to original source...
  15. Gancia, G., Zilibotti, F. (2009), "Technological Change and Wealth of Nations." Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 93-120, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.143333 Go to original source...
  16. Nelson, R. R., Phelps, E. S. (1966), "Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion and Economic Growth." American Economic Review, Vol. 56, No. 1/2, pp. 69-75.
  17. Peretto, P. F., Valente, S. (2010), "Resources, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy." Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 387-399, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.07.001 Go to original source...
  18. Rivera-Batiz, L. A., Romer, P. M. (1991), "Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth." The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, No. 2, pp. 531-555, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2937946 Go to original source...
  19. Sala-i-Martin, X., Subramanian, A. (2003), Addressing the Natural Resource Curse: An Illustration from Nigeria, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 9804, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Go to original source...
  20. Segal, P. (2008), Natural Resource Wealth and Directed Technical Change, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford University.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.