Prague Economic Papers 2016, 25(6):723-741 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.586

EIC: A New Tool for Intellectual Capital Performance Measurement

Bojan Krstić1, Ljiljana Bonić2
1 University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Niš, Republic of Serbia (bojan.krstic@eknfak.ni.ac.rs)
2 University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Niš, Republic of Serbia (ljiljana.bonic@eknfak.ni.ac.rs)

The purpose of this paper is to emphasize the importance of intellectual capital (IC) undisclosed on the assets side on the balance sheet of knowledge enterprises. This capital is very relevant, and mana-gers need to have information about it in order to facilitate effective IC management process. The issue of IC performance measurement has been a matter of growing importance in both academic community and managerial practices for the past two decades. Based on the previous ideas put forward in the literature of knowledge management and IC management, this paper suggests a new methodological framework for overcoming the problem of IC performance measurement in knowledge enterprises. Efficiency of Intellectual Capital (EIC) methodological framework offers practical solutions for measuring the efficiency of total enterprises' IC, as well as the efficiency in the use of all IC components. The EIC framework connects financial accounting valuation and market valuation.

Keywords: intellectual capital, measurement, performance, efficiency
JEL classification: M21

Prepublished online: May 20, 2016; Published: December 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krstić, B., & Bonić, L. (2016). EIC: A New Tool for Intellectual Capital Performance Measurement. Prague Economic Papers25(6), 723-741. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.586
Download citation

References

  1. Andriessen, D. (2004). Making Sense of Intellectual Capital. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. Go to original source...
  2. Bounfour, A. (2002). How to Measure Intellectual Capital's Dynamic Value: The IC-dVAL Approach. Presented at the 5th World Congress on Intellectual Capital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  3. Brennan, N., Connell, B. (2000). IC: Current Issues and Policy Implications. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(3), 206-240. DOI: 10.1108/14691930010350792. Go to original source...
  4. Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual Capital: Core Asset for the Third Millennium. London: International Thomson Business Press.
  5. Dixit, A. K., Pindyck, R. S. (2003). The Options Approach to Capital Investment. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, 163, pp. 570-582.
  6. Edvinsson, L., Malone, M. S. (1997). IC: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower. New York: Harper Business.
  7. Edvinsson, L. (1997). Developing IC at Skandia. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 366-373. DOI: 10.1016/s0024-6301(97)00016-2. Go to original source...
  8. Gu, F., Lev, B. (2002). Intangible Assets - Measurement, Drivers, Usefulness. Available at: http://questromapps.bu.edu/qstnet/Personal/Faculty/Publication/pubUploads/Gu,_Feng_05.pdf?wid=1482
  9. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. (2001). Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. University of California at Berkley working papers, Department of Economics. Available at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/iber/econ/E01-304 Go to original source...
  10. Jayawarna, D., Jones, O., Macpherson, A. (2014). Entrepreneurial Potential: The Role of Human and Cultural Capitals. International Small Business Journal, 32(8), 918-943. DOI: 10.1177/0266242614525795. Go to original source...
  11. Kaplan, R., Norton, D. (1992). Putting the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System, in Harvard Business Review on Measuring Corporate Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 183-211.
  12. Khoury, S. (1998). Valuing Intellectual Properties, in Sullivan, P. H., ed., Profiting from Intellectual Capital: Extracting Value from Innovation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 335-356.
  13. Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  14. M'Pherson, P. K., Pike, S. (2001). Accounting, Empirical Measurement and Intellectual Capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 246-260. DOI: 10.1108/eum0000000005659. Go to original source...
  15. Marr, B. (2006). Strategic Performance Management: Leveraging and Measuring Your Intangible Value Drivers. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Go to original source...
  16. Marr, B. (2008). Impact Future Value: How to Manage your Intellectual Capital. The Society of Management Accountants of Canada, The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Chartered Institute of management Accountants.
  17. Mouritsen, J., Larsen, H. T., Bukh, P. N., Johansen, M. R. (2001). Reading an Intellectual Capital Statement: Describing and Prescribing Knowledge Management Strategies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(4), 359-383. DOI: 10.1108/eum0000000006086. Go to original source...
  18. Pike, S., Roos, G. (2000). Intellectual Capital Measurement and Holistic Value Approach (HVA). Works Institute Journal (Japan), 42, October- November.
  19. Pulic, A. (2000). VAIC TM - An Accounting Tool for IC Management. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5-8), 702-714. DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2000.002891. Go to original source...
  20. Pulic, A., (2004). Intellectual Capital - Does It Create or Destroy Value? Measuring Business Excellece, 8(1), 62-68. DOI: 10.1108/13683040410524757. Go to original source...
  21. Reilly, R., Schweihs, R. (1999). Valuing Intangible Assets. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  22. Roos, G., Roos, J. (1997). Measuring Your Company's Intellectual Performance. Longe Range Planning, 30(3), 413-426. DOI: 10.1016/s0024-6301(97)90260-0. Go to original source...
  23. Roos, G., Roos, J., Dragonetti, N., Edvinsson, L. (1997). IC: Navigating in the New Business Landscape. New York: New York University Press. Go to original source...
  24. Roos, G., Pike, S., Fernstrom, L. (2005). Managing IC in Practice. Oxford, GB: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  25. Sackman, S., Flamholz,E., Bullen, M. (1989). Human Resource Accounting - A State of the Art Review. Journal of Accounting Literature, 8, pp. 235-264.
  26. Software AG (2012). Software AG Annual Report 2011. [Retrieved 2015-3-20] Available at: http://www.softwareag.com/us/images/sag_q1_en_web_X_120524_tcm89-98760.pdf
  27. Standfield, K. (2001). Time Capital and Intangible Accounting: The Approaches to Intellectual Capital, in Malhotra, Y., ed., Knowledge Management and Business Model Innovation. Hershey. PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 316-324. Go to original source...
  28. Steward, G. B. (1994). EVA: Fact and Fantasy. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(2), 71-84. Go to original source...
  29. Steward, T. (1997). IC: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  30. Sullivan, P. (1999). Profiting from Intellectual Capital. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(2), 132-143. DOI: 10.1108/13673279910275585. Go to original source...
  31. Sullivan, P. H. (2000). Value Driven Intellectual Capital: How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets into Market Value. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Go to original source...
  32. Sveiby, K. E. et al. (1989). The Invisible Balance Sheet. Available at: http://www.sveiby.com/articles/IntangAss/DenOsznliga.pdf
  33. Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth - Managing & Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. San Francisco, USA: Berrett - Koehler Publishers, Inc.
  34. Viedma, M. (2001). ICBS Intellectual Capital Benchmarking System. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(2), 148-164. DOI: 10.1108/14691930110385937. Go to original source...
  35. Wiederhold, G. (2014). Valuing Intellectual Capital - Multinationals and Taxhavens. New York: Springer. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.