Politická ekonomie 2015, 63(6):741-758 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1024

(A)symetria v Okunovom zákone v štátoch Vyšehradskej skupiny

Martin Boďa, Petra Medveďová, Mariana Považanová
Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici.

(A)symmetry in Okun's Law in the Visegrad Group Countries

Having regard to the importance of the compensation effect between output and unemployment known as Okun's law for both contemporary economic theory and for practical economic policy, the intent of the paper is to examine the empirical validity of Okun's law for the four Visegrad Group countries with consideration given to possible asymmetry. Using the quarterly data for the period from Q1/1998 and Q2/2014 and its gap version, Okun's law is verifi ed for each investigated country and some specifi cs of labour markets are highlighted so as to explain the magnitude of the estimated Okun's coeffi cients. The contribution of the paper is two-fold. First, this empirical relationship is confi rmed in validity with attention directed to the foursome of countries. Second, the analysis utilizes the non-linear ARDL model proposed in the paper to accommodate possible nonlinearity and asymmetry in Okun's law. Asymmetry is found and economically reasoned by the specifi cs of the labour market only for Slovakia since there appears to be a different reaction of the unemployment gap to positive output gap and to negative one.

Keywords: Okun's law, gap version, ARDL model, asymmetric non-linear ARDL model, V4 countries
JEL classification: C22, E24, E32

Published: October 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Boďa, M., Medveďová, P., & Považanová, M. (2015). (A)symmetry in Okun's Law in the Visegrad Group Countries. Politická ekonomie63(6), 741-758. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1024
Download citation

References

  1. ATTFIELD, C. L. F.; SILVERSTONE, B. 1998. Okun's Law, Cointegration and Gap Variables. Journal of Macroeconomics. 1998, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 625-637. Go to original source...
  2. BALCILAR, M. 2007. mFilter: miscellaneous time series filters. [online]. Dokumentácia k balíku dynlm v programe R. Verzia 0.1-3 z 06-11-2007. [cit. 06-01-2015]. Dostupné na: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mFilter/index.html.
  3. BALL, L.; LEIGH, D.; LOUNGANI, P. 2013. Okun's Law: Fit at 50? [IMF Working Paper WP/13/10], Washington: IMF, 2013. Dostupné na: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/wp1310.pdf. Go to original source...
  4. BLANCHARD, O. J.; SUMMERS, L. H. 1986. Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem. [NBER Working Paper No. 1950] Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research, 1986, Vol. 1. Dostupné na: http://www.nber.org/papers/w1950.pdf. doi: 10.2307/3585159. Go to original source...
  5. CEVIK, E. I.; DIBOOGLU, S.; BARIŞIK, S. 2013. Asymmetry in the Unemployment-Output Relationship Over the Business Cycle: Evidence from Transition Economies. Comparative Economic Studies. 2013, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 557-581. doi: 10.1057/ces.2013.7. Go to original source...
  6. ČADIL, J. et al. 2011. Odhad nákladů nezaměstnanosti z pohledu veřejných rozpočtů. Politická ekonomie. 2011, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 618-637. Go to original source...
  7. DURECH, R. et al. 2014. Regional evidence on Okun's Law in Czech Republic and Slovakia. Economic Modelling. 2014, Vol. 42, pp. 57-65. Go to original source...
  8. EFRON, B.; TIBSHIRANI, R. 1986. Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals and Ohter Measures of Statistical Accuracy. Statistical Science. 1986, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 54-75. Go to original source...
  9. FAY, J. A.; MEDOFF, J. L. 1985. Labor and Output Over the Business Cycle: Some Direct Evidence. The American Economic Revue. 1985, Vol. 75, No. 4, pp. 638-655.
  10. GORDON, R. J. 2010. Revisiting and Rethinking the Business Cycle: Okun's Law and Productivity Innovations. The American Economic Review. 2010, Vol. 100, No. 5, pp. 11-16. Go to original source...
  11. GRANGER, C. W. J.; TERÄSVIRTA, T. 1993. Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. ISBN 978-0-19-877320-X.
  12. GREENE, W. 2002. Econometric analysis. 5. vyd. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall, 2002. ISBN 978-0130661890.
  13. GREENWOOD-NIMMO, M. J.; SHIN, Y.; VAN TREECK, T. 2011. The Asymmetric ARDL Model with Multiple Unknown Threshold Decompositions: an Application to the Phillips Curve in Canada [Mimeo Working Paper Series]. Leeds (UK): The Leeds University Business School, 2011. Dostupné na: http://www.greenwoodeconomics.com/%28MG2%29IMK_multi.pdf.
  14. HANSEN, B. E. 1997. Inference in TAR Models. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics. 1997, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-16. doi: 10.2202/1558-3708.1024. Go to original source...
  15. HODRICK, R. J.; PRESCOTT, E. C. 1997. Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: an Empirical Investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 1997, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1-16. doi: 10.2307/2953682. Go to original source...
  16. HVOZDÍKOVÁ, V. 2011. Vplyv hospodárskej krízy na charakteristiky a štruktúru pracovnej sily v SR. In KOŠTA, J. (ed.). Trh práce v Slovenskej republike po jej vstupe do európskej menovej únie. Bratislava: Ekonomický ústav Slovenskej akadémie vied, 2011, pp. 77-88. ISBN 978-80-7144-188-5.
  17. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND. 2010. World Economic Outlook: Rebalancing Growth. [An April 2010 Survey] Washington DC: International Monetary Fund, 2010. Dostupné na: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/01/pdf/text.pdf. Go to original source...
  18. IZYUMOV, A.; VAHALY, J. 2002. The Unemployment-Output Tradeoff in Transition Economies: Does Okun's Law Apply? Economics of Planning. 2002, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 317-331. Go to original source...
  19. JAŠOVÁ, E.; KADEŘÁBKOVÁ, B. 2013. Využití odhadu NAIRU a ekonomického cyklu k analýze nestabilných období na trhu práce zemí V4. Sociálno-ekonomická revue. 2013, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.36-56.
  20. KADEŘÁBKOVÁ, B.; JAŠOVÁ, E. 2011. Analýza ukazatele NAIRU na sektorové úrovni. Politická ekonomie. 2011, Vol, 59., No. 4., pp. 508-525. Go to original source...
  21. LEE, J. 2000. The Robustness of Okun's Law: Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of Macroeconomics. 2000, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 331-356. Go to original source...
  22. PLAŠIL et al. 2011. Potenciální produkt, mezera výstupu a míra nejistoty spojená s jejich určením při použití Hodrick-Prescottova filtru. Politická ekonomie. 2011, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 490-507. Go to original source...
  23. MLYNAROVIČ, V.; MIŤKOVÁ, V. 2010. Makroekonomická analýza. Bratislava: Iura Edition, 2010. ISBN 978-80-8078-321-1.
  24. MORVAY, K. 2010. Vplyv ekonomickej recesie na štruktúrne zmeny zamestnanosti na Slovensku. Ekonomický časopis. 2010, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 144-155.
  25. OKUN, A. M. 1962. Potential GNP, Its Measurement and Significance. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. 1962, pp. 98-104.
  26. PEDERSEN, T. M. 2001. The Hodrick-Prescott Filter, the Slutzky Effect and the Distortionary Effect of Filters. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control. 2001, Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 1081-1101. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1889(99)00059-7. Go to original source...
  27. PIERDZIOCH, C.; RϋLKE, J.-C.; STADTMANN, G. 2011. Do Professional Economists' Forecasts Reflect Okun's Law? Some Evidence for the G7 Countries. Applied Economics. 2011, Vol. 43, pp. 1466-1483. Go to original source...
  28. R CORE TEAM. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Viedeň: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2012. Dostupné na: http://www.R-project.org. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
  29. RÜLKE, J.-C. 2012. Do Professional Forecasters Apply the Phillips Curve and Okun's Law? Evidence from Six Asian-Pacific Countries. Japan and the World Economy. 2012, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 317-324. Go to original source...
  30. SCHORDERET, Y. 2001. Revisiting Okun's Law: an Hysteretic Perspective. [Discussion Paper 200113] San Diego (CA): University of California, 2001. Dostupné na: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2fb7n2wd.pdf.
  31. SEPHTON, P. S. 2009. Persistence in U.S. State Unemployment Rates. Southern Economic Journal. 2009, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 458-466. doi: 10.4284/sej.2009.76.2.458. Go to original source...
  32. SHAO, J. 1996. Bootstrap Model Selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1996, Vol. 91, No. 434, pp. 655-665. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476934. Go to original source...
  33. SHIN, Y.; YU, B.; GREENWOOD-NIMMO, M. J. 2013. Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework. In SICKLES, R.; HORRACE, W. (eds.). Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. New York: Springer, 2013, pp. 281-314. ISBN 978-1-48998007-6. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9. Go to original source...
  34. TSAY, R. S. 1989. Testing and Modeling Threshold Autoregressive Processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1989, Vol. 84, No. 405, pp. 231-240. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1989.10478760. Go to original source...
  35. VIRÉN, M. 2001. The Okun Curve Is Non-Linear. Economics Letters. 2001, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 253-257. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00370-0. Go to original source...
  36. ZEILEIS, A. 2014. dynlm: dynamic linear regression. [online]. Dokumentácia k balíku dynlm v programe R. Verzia 0.3-3 z 01-02-2014. [cit. 06-01-2015]. Dostupné na: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dynlm/index.html.
  37. ZIMKOVÁ, E.; BAROCHOVSKÝ, J. 2007 Odhad potenciálneho produktu a produkčnej medzery v slovenských podmienkach. Politická ekonomie. 2007, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 473-489. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.