Politická ekonomie 2009, 57(5):696-713 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.705

Návrh klasifikace soudobých sociálně-ekonomických přístupů k teorii růstu

Luděk Kouba
Mendelova zemědělská a lesnická univerzita v Brně.

The Proposal of Original Classification of Contemporary Social-Economic Approaches to the Growth Theory

The paper works with assumptions, that the conclusions of mainstream approaches to the growth theory are problematical; there are alternative social-economic approaches to the theory of economic growth that offer more plausible explanations of the fundamental economic questions than the traditional views; both social-economic lines of thought and social-economic approaches to the growth theory are not systematized. Considering of these matters, the main aim of this paper is to propose original classification of contemporary social-economic approaches to the growth theory and consecutively to characterize these classified approaches. Two partial streams within the social-economic approaches to the growth theory based on formal conception of institutions (the approach primarily emphasizing the importance of political institutions, the approach primarily emphasizing the importance of economic institutions) have many common features (subjects, methodology, conclusions, exponents) and they together make prevailing stream of the contemporary social-economic growth theory. The growth theory of the new institutional economics based on the North's path dependency concept is still less profiled. This approach really accepts the conception of institutions of Douglas North.

Keywords: economic growth, path dependency, Classification of growth theory, formal institutions, informal institutions
JEL classification: O10, O43, P14

Published: October 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kouba, L. (2009). The Proposal of Original Classification of Contemporary Social-Economic Approaches to the Growth Theory. Politická ekonomie57(5), 696-713. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.705
Download citation

References

  1. ALESINA, A.; PEROTTI, R. 1994. The political economy of growth: a critical survey of the recent literature. World Bank Economic Review. 1994, 8(3). Go to original source...
  2. ALESINA, A.; RODRIK, D. 1994. Distributive Politics and Economics Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1994, 109. Go to original source...
  3. ARON, J. 2000. Growth and Institutions: A Review of the Evidence. World Bank, The World Bank Research Observer. 2000, vol. 15, no. 1. Go to original source...
  4. ACEMOGLU, D. 2005. Constitutions, Politics and Economics: A Review Essay on Persson and Tabellini's "The Economic Effect of Constitutions". [NBER, 2005, Working Paper No. 11235]. Go to original source...
  5. ACEMOGLU, D. 2006. Modelling Inefficient Institutions. [NBER, 2006, Working Paper No. 11940]. Go to original source...
  6. ACEMOGLU, D.; JOHNSON, S.; ROBINSON, J. 2001. Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution. [NBER, 2001, Working Paper No. 8460]. Go to original source...
  7. ACEMOGLU, D.; JOHNSON, S.; ROBINSON, J. 2004. Institutions as the Fundamnetal Cause of LongRun Growth. [NBER, 2004, Working Paper No. 10481]. Go to original source...
  8. ACEMOGLU, D.; JOHNSON, S.; ROBINSON, J., Yared, P. 2005. From Education to Democracy? [NBER, 2005, Working Paper No. 11204]. Go to original source...
  9. ACEMOGLU, D.; ROBINSON, J. 2006. Persistence of Power, Elites and Institutions. [NBER, 2006, Working Paper No. 12108]. Go to original source...
  10. ARTHUR, W. B. 2007. Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-In by Historical Events. 1988. Dostupný na http://www.santafe.edu/~wbarthur/Papers/Pdf_files/EJ.pdf.
  11. BERTHÉLEMY, J.-C.; KAUFFMANN, C.; RENARD, L.; WEGNER, L. 2002. Political instability, political regimes and economic performance in African countries. 2002. Dostupný na www.csae.ox.ac.uk/ conferences/2002-UPaGiSSA/papers/Kauffmann-csae2002.pdf.
  12. BREINEK, P. 2006. Ekonomické důsledky institucí. Národohospodářský obzor. 2006, č. 1.
  13. BREINEK, P.; KOUBA, L. 2007. Vybrané aspekty ekonomické výkonnosti z pohledu nové institucionální ekonomie: případ transformujících se ekonomik. In LACINA, L., RUSEK, A. (eds.) Evropská unie: Trendy, příležitosti, rizika. Plzeň : nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk, 2007.
  14. BRENNAN, G.; BUCHANAN, J., M. 2000. The reason of rules: constitutional political economy (The collected works of James M. Buchanan; v. 10). Liberty Fund, 2000.
  15. BRETSCHGER, L. 1998. Wachstumstheorie. München, Wien : Oldenbourg, 1998.
  16. BURDA, M.; WYPLOSZ, C. 2001. Macroeconomics - a European text. New York : Oxford university press, 2001.
  17. CHANG, H.-J. 2006. Understanding the Relationship between Institutions and Economic Development. UNU-WIDER, 2006. Dostupný na http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=914620#PaperDownload.
  18. CLAGUE, CH. (ed.) 1997. Institutions and Economic Development: Growth and Governance in LessDeveloped and Post-Socialist Countries. London: The John Hopkins Universtity Press, 1997.
  19. CLAGUE, CH.; KEEFER, P.; KNACK, S.; OLSON, M. 1997. Institutional and Economic Performance: Property Rights and Contract Enforcement. In CLAGUE, Ch. (ed.) Institutions and Economic Development: Growth and Governance in Less-Developed and Post-Socialist Countries. London : The John Hopkins Universtity Press, 1997.
  20. CUKIERMAN A.; EDWARDS, S.; TABELLINI, Q. 2007. Seignorage and Political Instability. American Economic Review. June 1992. Dostupný na http://www.igier.uni-bocconi.it/whos.php?vedi=3751&tbn=albero&id_folder=177.
  21. DAVID, P.; A. 2007: Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. Dostupný na http://geein.fclar.unesp.br/reunioes/quinta/arquivos/060505_Clio_and_the_economics_of_qwerty.pdf.
  22. DOLAR, D.; KRAY, A. 2002. Institutions, Trade and Growth. The World Bank, 2002. Dostupný na http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEC/Resources/Institutions,Trade_and_Growth.pdf.
  23. DORNBUSCH, R.; FISHER, S.; STARTZ, R. 2004. Macroeconomics. New York : McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2004.
  24. DOUCOULIAGOS, H.; ULUBASOGLU, M. 2007. Democracy and Economic growth: A meta-analysis. Public Choice World Meeting 2007. Dostupný na http://www.creedexperiment.nl/pc2007/ocs/viewpaper.php?id=75. Go to original source...
  25. DROBAK, J.; NYE, J. (eds.) 1997. Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics. Academic Press, 1997.
  26. EASTERLY, W.; LEVINE, R. 2001. It´s Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models. 2001. Dostupný na http://www.cgdev.org/doc/expert%20pages/easterly/easterly_factwber.pdf. Go to original source...
  27. ENGERMAN, S. L.; SOKOLOFF, K. L. 2003. Institutions and Non-Institutional Explanations of Economic Differences. [NBER, 2003, Working Paper No. 9989]. Go to original source...
  28. ENSMINGER, J. 1997. Changing Property Rights: Reconciling Formal and Informal Rights to Land in Africa. In DROBAK, J.; NYE, J. Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics. Academic Press, 1997.
  29. FOSU, A. K. 2002. Political instability and economic growth: Implications of coup events in Sub-Saharan Africa - New Perspectives on Transition Economies: Africa. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. January, 2002. Dostupný na http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0254/is_1_61/ai_84426604/pg_1. Go to original source...
  30. FOSU, A. K. 2004. Mapping growth into economic development: has elite political instability mattered in Sub-Saharan Africa? American Journal of Economics and Sociology. Nov, 2004. Dostupný na http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0254/is_5_63/ai_n8642245. Go to original source...
  31. FRAIT, J.; ČERVENKA, M. 2002. Předpoklady a faktory dynamického růstu české ekonomiky ve světle nové teorie a empirie růstu. Studie Národohospodářského ústavu Josefa Hlávky. 2002, č. 3.
  32. FREEMAN, R. B. 2000. Single Peaked Vs. Diversified Capitalism: The Relation Between Economic Institutions and Outcomes? [NBER, 2000, Working Paper No. 7556]. Go to original source...
  33. GHURA, D.; MERCEREAU, B. 2004. Political Instability and Growth: The Central African Republic. [IMF, 2004, Working Paper 04/80]. Go to original source...
  34. GOLDIN, C. 1994. Cliometrics and the Nobel. [NBER, 1994, Historical Paper No. 65]. Go to original source...
  35. GORDON, R. J. 2006. Macroeconomics. Pearson, Addison Wesley, 2006.
  36. GLAESER, E. L.; LA PORTA, R.; LOPEZ-DE-SILANES, F.; SHLEIFER, A. 2004. Do Institutions Cause Growth? [NBER, 2004, Working Paper No. 10568]. Go to original source...
  37. GREIF, A.1997. On the Interrelations and Economic Implications of Economic, Social, Political and Normative Factors: Reflections from Two Late Medieval Societies. In DROBAK, J.; NYE, J. Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics. Academic Press, 1997.
  38. HALL, R. E.; JONES, CH. I. 1996. The Productivity of Nations. [NBER, 1996, Working Paper No. 5812]. Go to original source...
  39. HALL, R. E.; JONES, CH. I. 1999. Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others? 1999. Dostupný na http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~chad/pon400.pdf a http://elsa.berkeley.edu/users/chad/HallJonesQJE.pdf.
  40. HARRIS, J.; HUNTER, J.; LEWIS, C. M. (eds.) 2000. The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. Routledge, 2000.
  41. HEIJDRA, B. J.; VAN DER PLOEG, F. 2002. Foundations of modern macroeconomics. Oxford University Press, 2002.
  42. HODGSON, G.; M. 2004. The Evolution of Institutional Economics. London : Routledge, 2004. Go to original source...
  43. HOLMAN, R. 2004. Ekonomická analýza práva. Politická ekonomie. 2004, roč. 52, č. 4. Go to original source...
  44. JÜTTING, J. 2003. Institutions and Development: A Critical Review. [OECD Development Centre, 2003, Working Paper No. 210]. Go to original source...
  45. KOUBA, K. 2000. Konstituční ekonomie: popelka v české ekonomické obci. Praha, seminář ČSE, 2000, bulletin č. 17.
  46. KOUBA, K.; VYCHODIL, O.; ROBERTS, J. 2005. Privatizace bez kapitálu. Praha : Karolinum, 2005.
  47. KOUBA, L. 2005a. Konfrontace závěrů neoklasické teorie růstu a nové teorie růstu a alternativní vysvětlení rozdílů v ekonomické výkonnosti. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 2005, sv. LIII, č. 3.
  48. KOUBA, L. 2007. Sociálně-ekonomické přístupy k teorii růstu v rámci literatury ekonomie hlavního proudu. Národohospodářský obzor. 2007, č. 2.
  49. KOUBA, L. 2008. Přehled nových institucionálních směrů. In Firma a konkurenční prostředí 2008 Sekce 1 - Česká ekonomika v integračních procesech. Brno : MSD, s. r. o., 2008.
  50. KOUBA, L.; PŘENOSIL, J. 2003. Diskuse přístupů k teorii růstu v rámci nové politické ekonomie. Národohospodářský obzor. 2003, č. 4.
  51. KRIECKHAUS, J. 2006. Democracy and economic growth: how regional context influences regime effects. British Journal of Political Science, 2006, April. Go to original source...
  52. LAKOMAA, E. 2006. Can behavioural Economics Improve the Understanding of Politics? 2006. Dostupný na http://pubchoicesoc.org/papers_2006/lakomaa.pdf.
  53. LINDERT, P. H. 2003. Voice And Growth: Was Churchill Right? Journal of Economic History, 2003, v63 (2, Jun). Dostupný na http://www.nber.org/papers/w9749.pdf. Go to original source...
  54. MANTZAVINOS, C. 2001. Individuals, Institutions and Markets. Cambridge University Press, 2001. Go to original source...
  55. MINFORD, P.; PEEL, D. 2002. Advanced Macroeconomics: A Primer. Edward Elgar, 2002.
  56. McARTHUR, J. W.; SACHS J. D. 2001. Institutions and Geography: Comment on Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2000). [NBER, 2001, Working Paper No. 8114]. Go to original source...
  57. MC COMBIE, J.; THIRLWALL, A. P. 1999. Growth in an international context: a Post Keynesian view. In
  58. MCFAUL, M. 1999. Institutional Design, Uncertainty, and Path Dependency during Transitions: Cases from Russia. Constitutional Political Economy, 1999, 10. Go to original source...
  59. MLČOCH, L. 2005. Institucionální ekonomie. Praha : Nakladatelství Karolinum, 2005.
  60. MLČOCH, L. 2006. Ekonomie důvěry a společenského dobra. Praha : Nakladatelství Karolinum, 2006.
  61. MLČOCH, L.; MACHONIN, P.; SOJKA, M. 2000. Ekonomické a společenské změny v české společnosti po roce 1989. Praha : Nakladatelství Karolinum, 2000.
  62. MUELLER, D. C. 2006. Torsten Persson and Guido Tabellini, The Economic Effects of Constitutions. 2006. Dostupný na http://www.springerlink.com/content/k10145x87528w010.
  63. NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, 1982.
  64. NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. 2007. Preface to the Japanese Translation (An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change). 2007. Dostupný na http://www.si.umich.edu/ICOS/PrefacetoJapanese.pdf.
  65. NORTH, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990. Go to original source...
  66. NORTH, D. C. 1994. Vývoj ekonomické výkonnosti v čase. Politická ekonomie. 1994, roč. 42, č. 4.
  67. NORTH, D. C. 1995. Institucionální struktury a transformační procesy. Politická ekonomie. 1995, roč. 43, č. 5.
  68. NORTH, D. C. 1997. Prologue. In DROBAK, J., NYE, J. Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics. Academic Press, 1997.
  69. NORTH, D. C. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton University Press, 2005. Go to original source...
  70. OLSON, M. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidies. Yale University Press, 1982.
  71. OLSON, M. 1992. Big bills left on sidewalk: why some nations are rich and other poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1996, no. 2, Spring.
  72. OLSON, M. 2000. Power and Prosperity. Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships. New York : Basic Books, 2000.
  73. OLSSON, O. 2005. Geography and Instituions: Plausible and Implausible Linkages. In Growth, Trade and Economic Institutions. Wien, NewYork : Springer, 2005. Go to original source...
  74. PERSSON, T.; TABELLINI, G. 2003. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. The MIT Press, 2003. Go to original source...
  75. PERSSON, T.; TABELLINI, G. 2006. Democratic capital: The nexus of political and economic change. 2006. Dostupný na http://www.iies.su.se/~perssont/papers/paper_march29.pdf. Go to original source...
  76. PERSSON, T.; TABELLINI, G. 2007. The growth effect of democracy: Is it heterogenous and how can it be estimated? 2007. Dostupný na http://www.iies.su.se/~perssont/papers/cifar_paper_may16_07.pdf. Go to original source...
  77. POSEN, A. 1998. Do Better Institutions make Better Policy? International finance. 1998, 1 (1).
  78. PRZEWORSKI, A. 2004. Democracy and Economic Development. 2004. Dostupný na www.nyu.edu/ gsas/dept/politics/faculty/przeworski/papers/sisson.pdf.
  79. PRZEWORSKI, A. 2005. Self-enforcing Democracy. 2005. Dostupný na www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/ politics/faculty/przeworski/papers/wittman.pdf.
  80. PRZEWORSKI, A.; LIMOGNI, F. 1993. Political Regimes and Economic Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1993, no. 3. Go to original source...
  81. PUTNAM, R. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton : Princeton University, 1993.
  82. RAUCH, J. 1994. Demosclerosis. New York : Random House, 1994.
  83. RODRIK, D. 1997. Democracy and Economic Performance. 1997. Dostupný na www.j-bradforddelong.net/Teaching_Folder/Econ_202c/readberk/9-Political_Economy/demoecon.PDF.
  84. RODRIK, D. 2000. Institutions for High-Quality Growth: What They Are and How to Acquire Them. [NBER 2000, Working paper No. 7540]. Go to original source...
  85. RODRIK, D.; SUBRAMANIAN, A.; TREBBI, F. 2002. Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Instituttions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. [NBER, 2002, Working Paper No. 9305]. Go to original source...
  86. ROMER, D. 2001. Advanced Macroeconomics. New York : McGraw Hill, 2001.
  87. SACHS, J. D. 2003. Institutions Don't Rule: Direct Effect of Geography on Per Capita Income. [NBER, 2003, Working Paper No. 9490]. Go to original source...
  88. THIRLWALL, A. P. 2002. The Nature of Economic Growth: an alternative framework for understanding the performance of nations. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar, 2002. Go to original source...
  89. WIESENTHAL, H. 2003. German unification and "model Germany": an adventure in institutional conservatism. 2003. Dostupný na www.accessmylibrary.com. Go to original source...
  90. WEIL, D. N. 2005. Economic growth. Pearson, Addison Wesley, 2005.
  91. ZAKARIA, F. 2005. Budoucnost svobody - Neliberální demokracie v USA a ve světě. Praha : Academia, 2005.
  92. ZWEYNERT, J.; GOLDSCHMIDT, N. 2005. The Two Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe and the Relation between Path Dependent and Politically Implemented Institutional Change. [HWWA Discussion Paper, Hamburg, 2005]. Dostupný na http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=704281. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.