Politická ekonomie 2015, 63(1):74-90 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.989

Soukromý a veřejný dluh

Vratislav Izák
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.

Private and Public Debt

We analyse potential sources of internal imbalances, specifically as regards private and public indebtedness. The combination of a high public debt and increasing private sector indebtedness have been a source of concern in the perspective of the funding of the economy in examined countries. We utilize the detailed financial accounts as an analytical framework for revealing the development of private sector 's indebtedness in 18 EU countries in the period 1995-2012. Ratio of private debt (non-financial corporations, households and non-profit institutions serving households) to GDP was steadily increasing till 2009 with a decrease in the following years. After the decomposition of the private sector debt several facts stand out. Highly indebted, on the average, are households in Denmark and The Netherlands. Postsocialist countries have still low indebtedness, but are catching up. In panel regressions (fixed effects) the dependent variable is overlapping two-and free-year forward looking averages. The control variables are those usually used in growth equations a la R. Barro. We have utilised also instrumental variables (Pooled IV Two-stage EGLS) and 3 years averages for all variables to capture medium-run impacts. Having analysed the impacts of different private debt variables on the growth rate of real GDP we assert that the impact has been negative and statistically significant in almost all growth regressions.

Keywords: public debt, flow of funds, private debt, panel analysis, growth equation
JEL classification: D9, E6, H3

Published: February 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Izák, V. (2015). Private and Public Debt. Politická ekonomie63(1), 74-90. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.989
Download citation

References

  1. ALLEN, M.; ROSENBERG, Ch.; KELLER, Ch.; SETSER, B.; ROUBINI, N. 2002. A Balance Sheet Approach to Financial Crisis. IMF Working Paper, WP /02/2002. Go to original source...
  2. BARRO, R.; SALA-i-MARTIN, X.; 1999. Economic Growth. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press, 1999.
  3. BERNANKE, B.; GERTLER, M.; GILCHRIST, S. 1996. The Financial Accelerator and the Flight to Quality. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1996, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 1-15. Go to original source...
  4. BLEANEY, M.; GEMELL, N.; KNELLER, R. 2001. Testing the Endogenous Growth Model: Public Expenditure, Taxation and Growth over the Long Run. Canadian Journal of Economics. 2001, Vol. 34, No 1, pp. 36-57. Go to original source...
  5. BLUNDELL-WIGNALL, A. 2012. Solving the Financial and Sovereign Debt Crisis in Europe. OECD Journal of Financial Market Trends. Volume 2011, No. 2. OECD 2012. Go to original source...
  6. BOUIS, R.; CHRISTENSEN, A.; COURNEDE, B. 2013. Deleveraging: Challenges, Progress and Policies. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No 1077. 2013.
  7. BURGER, P. 2003. Sustainable Fiscal Policy and Economic Stability. Theory and Practise. Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar, 2003.
  8. CECCHETTI, S.; KHARROUBI, E. 2012. Reassessing the Impact of Finance on Growth. BIS, Working Papers No 381, 2012.
  9. CECCHETTI, S.; MOHANTY, M. S.; ZAMPOLI, F. 2011. The Real Effects of Debt. BIS Working Papers No. 352, 2011.
  10. CLAESSENS, S.; KOSE-AYHEN, M. 2013. Financial Crisis: Explanations, Types and Implications. IMF Working Papers, WP /13/28. 2013. Go to original source...
  11. DEVARAJAN, S.; SWAROOP, V.; HANG-FU, Z. 1996. The Composition of Public Spending and Economic Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1996, Vol. 37, No. 2-3, pp. 313-344. Go to original source...
  12. FOLSTER, S.; HENREKSON, M. 2000. Growth Effects of Government Expenditure and Taxation in Rich Countries. European Economic Review. 2000, Vol. 45, No. 8, pp. 1501-1520. Go to original source...
  13. CHECHERITA, C.; ROTHER, P. 2010. The Impact of High and Growing Government Debt on Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation for the Euro Area. ECB Working Papers No. 1237, 2010.
  14. IZAK, V. 2012. Household Indebtedness and Economic Growth (Empirical Analysis). European Financial and Accounting Journal. 2012, Vol. 7, No. 3-4, pp. 10-32. Go to original source...
  15. IZAK, V. 2013. Debt of Nonfinancial Corporations and Economic Growth. Politická ekonomie. 2013, Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 171-187. Go to original source...
  16. JUDSON, R.; OWEN, A. 1999. Estimating Dynamic Models: A Guide for Macroeconomists. Economic Letters. 1999, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 9-15. Go to original source...
  17. KNELLER, R.; BLEANEY, M. F.; GEMMEL, N. 1999. Fiscal Policy and Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of Public Economics. 1999, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 171-190. Go to original source...
  18. KOTLÁN, I.; MACHOVÁ, Z.; JANÍČKOVÁ, L. 2011. Vliv zdanění na dlouhodobý ekonomický růst. Politická ekonomie. 2011, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 638-658. Go to original source...
  19. KOTLÁN, I.; MACHOVÁ, Z. 2014. Horizont daňové politiky v zemích OECD. Politická ekonomie. 2014, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 161-173. Go to original source...
  20. KUMAR, M.; WOO, J. 2010. Public Debt and Growth. IMF Working Papers, WP/10/174, July 2010. Go to original source...
  21. MEROLA, R. 2012. Debt and Macroeconomic Stability: Case Studies. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1004, 2012. Go to original source...
  22. ODODEKUN, M. O. 2001. Public Finance and Economic Growth. Discussion Paper No 2001/172. WIDER, United Nations University, 2001.
  23. REINHART, C. K.; ROGOFF, K. S. W. 2010. From Financial Crash to Debt Crisis. NBER, Working Paper No. 15795, 2010. Go to original source...
  24. SALA-i-MARTIN, X. 1994. Cross-sectional Regressions and the Empirics of Economic Growth. European Economic Review. 1994, Vol. 38, No. 3-4, pp. 739-747. Go to original source...
  25. SUTHERLAND D.; HOELLER, P.; MEROLA, R.; YIEMANN, V. 2012. Debt and Macroeconomic Stability, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1003, 2012. Go to original source...
  26. WHITE W. 2012. Credit Crisis and the Shortcomings of Traditional Policy Responses. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 971, 2012. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.