Politická ekonomie 2015, 63(2):204-222 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.997

Nekonzistentnosť časových preferencií ľudí z arginalizovaných rómskych komunít

Tomáš Želinský
IES-FSV Univerzita Karlova v Praze a Technická univerzita v Košiciach.

On inconsistency of time preferences of people from the marginalised roma communities

Keywords: Slovakia, time discounting, present-biased preferences, future-biased preferences, marginalised Roma communities
JEL classification: C93, D91

Published: April 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Želinský, T. (2015). On inconsistency of time preferences of people from the marginalised roma communities. Politická ekonomie63(2), 204-222. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.997
Download citation

References

  1. AINSLIE, G.; MONTEROSSO, J. 2003. Hyperbolic Discounting as a Factor in Addiction: A Critical Analysis. In VUCHINICH, R.; HEATHER, N. (eds.). Choice, Behavioral Economics and Addiction. Pergamon, 2003. Go to original source...
  2. ASHRAF, N.; KARLAN, D.; YIN, W. 2006. Tying Odysseus to the Mast: Evidence from a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2006, Vol. 121, No. 2, pp. 635-672. Go to original source...
  3. ATKESON, A.; OGAKI, M. 1996. Wealth-varying Intertemporal Elasticities of Substitution: Evidence from Panel and Aggregate Data. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1996, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 507-534. Go to original source...
  4. BANERJEE, A.; MULLAINATHAN, S. 2010. The Shape of Temptation: Implications for the Economic Lives of the Poor. NBER Working Paper 15973. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Go to original source...
  5. BAUER, M.; CHYTILOVÁ, J.; MORDUCH, J. 2012. Behavioral Foundations of Microcredit: Experimental and Survey Evidence from Rural India. American Economic Review. 2012, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 1118-1139. Go to original source...
  6. BENHABIB, J.; BISIN, A.; SCHOTTER A. 2010. Present-bias, Quasi-hyperbolic Discounting, and Fixed Costs. Games and Economic Behavior. 2010, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 205-223. Go to original source...
  7. BERNHEIM, B. D.; RAY, D.; YELTEKIN, S. 2013. Poverty and Self-Control. NBER Working paper 18742. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Go to original source...
  8. BOOIJ, A. S.; VAN PRAAG, M. S. 2009. A Simultaneous Approach to the Estimation of Risk Aversion and the Subjective Time Discount Rate. Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization. 2009, Vol. 70, No. 1-2, pp. 374-388. Go to original source...
  9. BUCHHOLZ, W.; SCHUMACHER, J. 2010. Discounting and Welfare Analysis over Time: Choosing the Eta. European Journal of Political Economy. 2010, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 372-385. Go to original source...
  10. CALIENDO, F. N. 2011. Time-inconsistent Preferences and Social Security: Revisited in Continuous Time. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control. May 2011, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 668-675 Go to original source...
  11. CALVO, G. 1978. Some Notes on Time Inconsistency and Rawls' Maximin Criterion. The Review of Economic Studies. 1978, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 97-102. Go to original source...
  12. CLOT, S.; STANTON, CH. 2014. Present Bias in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Insights from a Behavioural Experiment in Uganda. DR no 2014-3. Montpellier: Unite de Formation et de Recherche d'Economie.
  13. DUBRA, J. 2009. A Theory of Time Preferences over Risky Outcomes. Journal of Mathematical Economics. 2009, Vol. 45, No. 9-10, pp. 576-588. Go to original source...
  14. DŽAMBAZOVIČ, R. 2007. Priestorové aspekty chudoby a sociálneho vylúčenia. Sociológia. 2007, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 432-458 Go to original source...
  15. FERRATY, F.; VIEU, P. 2006. Nonparametric Functional Data Analysis: Theory and Practice. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer.
  16. FILADELFIOVÁ, J. 2007. Životný cyklus: Vek, životný cyklus a medzigeneračný prenos chudoby. In GERBERY, D.; LESAY, I.; ŠKOBLA, D. (eds.). Kniha o chudobe: spoločenské súvislosti a verejné politiky. Bratislava: Priatelia Zeme-CEPA. s. 9-28. ISBN 978-80-968918-9-4.
  17. FISHBURN, P. C. 1970. Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1970. Go to original source...
  18. FANG H.; SILVERMAN D. 2009. Time-inconsistency and Welfare Program Participation: Evidence from the NLSY. International Economic Review. 2009, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 1043-1077. Go to original source...
  19. FREDERICK, S.; LOEWENSTEIN, G.; O'DONOGHUE, T. 2002. Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature. 2002, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 351-401. Go to original source...
  20. GOLDMAN, S. M. 1979. Intertemporally Inconsistent Preferences and the Rate of Consumption. Econometrica. 1979, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 621-626. Go to original source...
  21. GOOD, P. 2000. Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses. 2. vyd. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-98898-X. Go to original source...
  22. HARDISTY, D. J. et al. 2013. How to Measure Time Preferences: An Experimental Comparison of Three Methods. Judgment and Decision Making, 2013, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 236-249. Go to original source...
  23. HARRISON, G. W.; LAU, M. I.; WILLIAMS, M. B. 2002. Estimating Individual Discount Rates in Denmark: A Field Experiment. American Economic Review. Vol. 92, Vol. 5, pp. 1606-1617. Go to original source...
  24. HENDL, J. 2006. Přehled statistických metod zpracování dat: analýza a metaanalýza dat. Praha: Portál. ISBN 80-7367-123-9.
  25. HERINGS, P. J.-J.; ROHDE, K. I. M. 2006. Time-inconsistent Preferences in a General Equilibrium Model. Economic Theory. 2006, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 591-619. Go to original source...
  26. HOCH, S. J.; LOEWENSTEIN, G. F. 1991. Time-inconsistent Preferences and Consumer Self-Control. Journal of Consumer Research. 1991, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 492-507. Go to original source...
  27. HOTHORN, T. et al. 2006. A Lego System for Conditional Inference. The American Statistician. 2006, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 257-263. Go to original source...
  28. HOTHORN, T. et al. 2008. Implementing a Class of Permutation Tests: The Coin Package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2008, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 1-23. Go to original source...
  29. HRUSTIČ, T. 2012. Koncept úžery v segregovaných rómskych osadách. Romistické utopie, Praha, 25. 10. 2012. Praha: Filozofická fakulta UK, Ústav jižní a centrální Asie, Seminář romistiky.
  30. KAHNEMAN, D. et al. 1997. Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997, Vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 375-406. Go to original source...
  31. KINARI, Y.; OHTAKE, F.; TSUTSUI, Y. 2009. Time Discounting: Declining Impatience and Interval Effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2009, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 87-112. Go to original source...
  32. KIRBY, K. N. et al. 2002. Correlates of Delay-discount Rates: Evidence from Tsimane' Amerindians of the Bolivian Rain Forest. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2002, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 291-316. Go to original source...
  33. KOOPMANS, T. C. 1960. Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience. Econometrica. 1960, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 287-309. Go to original source...
  34. LAIBSON, D. I. 1996. Hyperbolic Discount Functions, Undersaving, and Savings Policy. NBER Working Paper 5635. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Go to original source...
  35. LAIBSON, D. I. 1997. Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997, Vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 443-477. Go to original source...
  36. LANCASTER, K. J. 1963. An Axiomatic Theory of Consumer Time Preference. International Economic Review. 1963, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 221-231. Go to original source...
  37. LAWRANCE, E. C. 1991. Poverty and the Rate of Time Preference: Evidence from Panel Data. Journal of Political Economy. 1991, Vol. 99, No. 1, pp. 54-77. Go to original source...
  38. LOEWENSTEIN, G.; PRELEC, D. 1992. Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1992, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 573-597. Go to original source...
  39. MARIN-SOLANO, J.; NAVAS J. 2010. Consumption and portfolio rules for time-inconsistent investors. European Journal of Operational Research. 2010, Vol. 201, No. 3, pp. 860-872. Go to original source...
  40. MEIER, S.; SPRENGER, CH. D. 2010. Stability of Time Preferences. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4756. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  41. O'DONOGHUE, T.; RABIN, M. 1999. Doing it Now or Later. The American Economic Review. 1999, Vol. 89, No. 1, pp. 103-124. Go to original source...
  42. R CORE TEAM. 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Viedeň: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Dostupné na http://www.R-project.org/.
  43. REUBEN E. et al. 2010. Time Discounting for Primary and Monetary Rewards. Economics Letters. 2010, Vol. 106, No. 2, pp. 125-127. Go to original source...
  44. ROHDE K. I. M. 2010. The Hyperbolic Factor: A Measure of Time Inconsistency. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2010, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 125-140. Go to original source...
  45. ROOK, D. W. 1987. The Buying Impulse. Journal of Consumer Research. 1987, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 189-199. Go to original source...
  46. SAMUELSON, P. A. 1937. A Note on Measurement of Utility. The Review of Economic Studies. 1937, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 155-161. Go to original source...
  47. SHESKIN, D. J. 2007. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC. ISBN 978-1-58488-814-7.
  48. SATCHELL, S. E.; THORP, S. 2011. Uncertain Survival and Time Discounting: Intertemporal Consumption Plans for Family Trusts. Journal of Population Economics. 2011, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 239-266. Go to original source...
  49. STRASSER, H.; WEBER, C. 1999. On the Asymptotic Theory of Permutation Statistics. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. 1999, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 220-250.
  50. STROTZ, R. H. 1955-1956. Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. The Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 165-180. Go to original source...
  51. TAKEUCHI, K. 2011. Non-parametric Test of Time Consistency: Present Bias and Future Bias. Games and Economic Behavior. 2011, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 456-478. Go to original source...
  52. THALER, R. H.; SHEFRIN, H. M. 1981. An Economic Theory of Self-Control. Journal of Political Economy. 1981, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 392-406. Go to original source...
  53. VLÁDA SR. 2004. Analýza trestnej činnosti úžery na Slovensku a návrhu opatrení na jej riešenie. Bratislava: Úrad splnomocnenkyne vlády Slovenskej republiky pre rómske komunity.
  54. VOJÁČEK, O. 2011. K pojetí preferencí v ekonomickém myšlení. Politická ekonomie. 2011, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 345-358. Go to original source...
  55. WINSTON, G. C. 1980. Addiction and Backsliding: A Theory of Compulsive Consumption. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1980, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 295-324. Go to original source...
  56. ŽELINSKÝ, T. 2010. Porovnanie alternatívnych prístupov k odhadu individuálneho blahobytu domácností ohrozených rizikom chudoby. Ekonomický časopis. 2010, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 251-270.
  57. ŽELINSKÝ, T. 2011. Mikrofinancie ako alternatívny nástroj na riešenie problému chudoby rómskeho obyvateľstva v marginalizovaných regiónoch. Sociológia. 2011, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 57-88.
  58. ŽULATÁKOVÁ, S. 2007. Vplyv demografických a sociálnych faktorov na priebeh tehotenstva u rómskych žien. Verejné zdravotníctvo. 2007, Vol. 4, No. 1, (nestr.).

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.