Acta Oeconomica Pragensia
Acta Oeconomica Pragensia
Acta Oeconomica Pragensia
Journal of Central and Eastern European Economic and Management Issues

Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2017/1

Causality Illusion and Overconfidence in Predicting (Quasi)Stochastic Financial Events


[full text (PDF)]

Petr Houdek, Petr Koblovský, Jan Plaček, Luboš Smrčka

We argue that individuals systematically interpret sequences of events in a causal manner. The aim of this article is to show that people do so even if they are aware of the stochastic nature of the respective sequence. The bias can explain some anomalous behaviour of investors in financial markets. Small as well as professional investors may illusorily perceive causality of former random success and future yield. Laboratory experiments testing the interpretation of stochastically occurring events in financial designs as well as analyses of real trading data from financial markets confirm that investors indeed interpret (quasi)random events casually; they make incorrect predictions and they egocentrically allocate responsibility for their success. The causality illusion induces overconfidence, inefficient investment and risk seeking. In the conclusion, we discuss factors that may limit effects of the causality illusion and suggest future areas for research.

Keywords: hot hand, illusive causality, overconfidence, risk taking, self-attribution, stochasticity

JEL Classification: D14, D83, G02, G11, G17


BARBER, B. M. a ODEAN, T., 2000. Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock

Investment Performance of Individual Investors. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 773–806,

BARBER, B. M., ODEAN, T. a ZHU, N., 2009. Systematic noise. Journal of Financial Markets,12(4),


BEN-DAVID, I., BIRRU, J. a PROKOPENYA, V., 2014. Uninformative Feedback and Risk Taking

Evidence from Retail Forex Trading (March 28, 2016). Charles A. Dice Center Working

Paper No. 2014-17; Fisher College of Business Working Paper No. 2014-03-17.

BERTRAND, M., BERGSTRESSER, D., CHALMERS, J. M. R. a TUFANO, P., 2009. Assessing the Costs

and Benefits of Brokers in the Mutual Fund Industry. Review of Financial Studies, 22(10),


BERNHEIM, B. D. a GARRETT, D. M. 2003. The Effects of Financial Education in the Workplace:

Evidence from a Survey of Households. Journal of Public Economics, 87(7), 1487–1519,

BERNHEIM, B. D., GARRETT, D. M. a MAKI, D. M., 2001. Education and Saving: The Long-Term

Effects of High School Financial Curriculum Mandates. Journal of Public Economics, 80(3),


BOU, S., CAYÓN, M., BRANDTS, J., GUILLÉN, P., 2013. The Price of Luck [online]. [cit. 10. 1. 2015].

Dostupné z:

BRAUNSTEIN, S. a WELCH, C., 2002. Financial Literacy: An Overview of Practice, Research, and

Policy. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 88, 445–457.

CAMERER, C. F., 1989. Does the Basketball Market Believe in the ‘Hot Hand’? The American

Economic Review. 79(5), 1257–1261. ISSN 0002-8282.

CAMERER, C. F., 2015. The Promise and Success of Lab-Field Generalizability in Experimental

Economics: A Critical Reply to Levitt and List. In Fréchette, G. R. a Schotter, A. Handbook of

Experimental Economic Methodology. Oxford University Press, 249–295.

ISBN 9780195328325.

CHIANG, Y.-M., HIRSHLEIFER, D., QIAN, Y. a SHERMAN, A. E., 2011. Do Investors Learn from

Experience? Evidence from Frequent IPO Investors. Review of Financial Studies 24(5),


CLOTFELTER, C. T. a COOK, P. J., 1993. The “Gambler’s Fallacy” in Lottery Play. Management

Science. 39(12), 1521–1525,

CROSON, R. a SUNDALI, J., 2005. The Gambler’s Fallacy and the Hot Hand: Empirical Data from

Casinos. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30(3), 195–209.

DELLAVIGNA, S., 2009. Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Economic

Literature. 47(2), 315–372,

DORN, A. J., DORN, D. a SENGMUELLER, P., 2014. Trading as Gambling. Management Science,

61(10), 2376–2393,

DUFLO, E. a SAEZ, E., 2003. The Role of Information and Social Interactions in Retirement Plan

Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,

118(3), 815–842,


Counseling on Subsequent Borrower Behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 1–28,

FALK, A. a HECKMAN, J. J., 2009. Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the

Social Sciences. Science, 326(5952), 535–538,

FAMA, E. F. a FRENCH, K. R., 2010. Luck versus Skill in the Cross-Section of Mutual Fund Returns.

The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1915–1947,

FENG, L. a SEASHOLES, M. S., 2005. Do Investor Sophistication and Trading Experience

Eliminate Behavioral Biases in Financial Markets? Review of Finance, 9(3), 305–351,

FRENCH, K. R., 2008. Presidential Address: The Cost of Active Investing. The Journal of Finance,

63(4), 1537–1573,

FRIJNS, B., GILBERT, A. a TOURANI-RAD, A., 2014. Learning by Doing: The Role of Financial

Experience in Financial Literacy. Journal of Public Policy, 34(1), 123–154,

GALBO-JØRGENSEN, C. B., SUETENS, S. a TYRAN, J.-R., 2016. Predicting Lotto Numbers:

A Natural Experiment on the Gamblers Fallacy and the Hot Hand Fallacy. Journal of the

European Economic Association, 14(3), 584–607,

GENNAIOLI, N., SHLEIFER, A. a VISHNY, R., 2015. Money Doctors. The Journal of Finance, 70(1),


GERVAIS, S. a ODEAN, T., 2001. Learning to Be Overconfident. Review of Financial Studies, 14(1),


GILOVICH, T., VALLONE, R. a TVERSKY, A., 1985. The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the

Misperception of Random Sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 295–314,

GRUBER, M. J., 1996. Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds. The

Journal of Finance, 51(3), 783–810,

GUL, F. a PESENDORFER, W., 2008. The Case for Mindless Economics. In Caplin, A. a Schotter, A.

(eds.). The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook (Handbooks in

Economic Methodologies). New York: Oxford University Press, 3–42. ISBN 0199744858.

GURYAN, J. a KEARNEY, M. S., 2008. Gambling at Lucky Stores: Empirical Evidence from State

Lottery Sales. The American Economic Review, 98(1), 458–473,

HASELTON, M. G. a NETTLE, D., 2006. The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model

of Cognitive Biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 47–66,

HENRICH, J., HEINE, S. J. a NORENZAYAN, A., 2010. The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral

and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83,

HERTWIG, R. a ORTMANN, A., 2001. Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological

Challenge for Psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 383–403,

HEUER, J., MERKLE, C. a WEBER, M., 2016. Fooled by Randomness: Investor Perception of Fund

Manager Skill. Review of Finance, rfw011,

HOUDEK, P., 2016a. What Comes to a Manager’s Mind: Theory of Local Thinking. Journal of

Management Inquiry, 25(4), 359–366,

HOUDEK, P., 2016b. A Perspective on Consumers 3.0: They Are Not Better Decision-Makers

Than Previous Generations. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(848),

HOUDEK, P., 2017. Rewards for Falling Off a Horse: Bad Corporate Governance Is Enabling

Managers to Receive Pay for Luck [v tisku]. Organizational Dynamics. ISSN 0090-2616.

HOUDEK, P. a KOBLOVSKÝ, P., 2017. Behavioural Economics of Organization: Employees and

Managers. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 20(1), 4–15.

HUBER, J., KIRCHLER, M. a STÖCKL, T., 2010. The Hot Hand Belief and the Gambler’s Fallacy in

Investment Decisions under Risk. Theory and Decision, 68(4), 445–462,

KAGEL, J. H. a ROTH, A. E. (eds.), 1997. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton:

Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691058970.

KOSOWSKI, R., TIMMERMANN, A., WERMERS, R. a WHITE, H. A. L., 2006. Can Mutual Fund “Stars”

Really Pick Stocks? New Evidence from a Bootstrap Analysis. The Journal of Finance, 61(6),


LANGER, E. J. a ROTH, J., 1975. Heads I win, tails it’s chance: The illusion of control as a function

of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 32(6), 951–955,

LEVITT, S. D. a LIST, J. A., 2007. What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences

Reveal About the Real World? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174,

LIEN, J. W. a YUAN, J., 2015. Selling to Biased Believers: Strategies of Online Lottery Ticket

Vendors. Economic Inquiry, 53(3), 1506–1521,

LUSARDI, A. a MITCHELL, O. S., 2014. The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory

and Evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44,

LYNCH, A. W. a MUSTO, D. K., 2003. How Investors Interpret Past Fund Returns. The Journal of

Finance, 58(5), 2033–2058,

MANDELL, L., 2009. The Impact of Financial Education in High School and College on Financial

Literacy and Subsequent Financial Decision Making [online]. [cit. 10. 10. 2015]. Dostupné





Illusions of Causality: How They Bias Our Everyday Thinking and How They Could Be

Reduced. Frontiers in Psychology, 6,

MILLER, J. B. a SANJURJO, A., 2015. Surprised by the Gambler’s and Hot Hand Fallacies? A Truth

in the Law of Small Numbers [IGIER Working Paper No. 552],

MULLAINATHAN, S., 2001. Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. The

Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 901–932,

MULLAINATHAN, S., SCHWARTZSTEIN, J. a SHLEIFER, A., 2008. Coarse Thinking and Persuasion.

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 577–619,

OREOPOULOS, P., von WACHTER, T. a HEISZ, A., 2012. The Short- and Long-Term Career Effects

of Graduating in a Recession. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(1), 1–29,

OSKARSSON, A. T., van BOVEN, L., MCCLELLAND, G. H. a HASTIE, R., 2009. What’s Next? Judging

Sequences of Binary Events. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 262–285,

POWDTHAVEE, N. a RIYANTO, Y. E., 2014. Would you Pay for Transparently Useless Advice? A Test

of Boundaries of Beliefs in The Folly of Predictions. Review of Economics and Statistics,

97(2), 257–272,

RABIN, M., 2002. Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers. The Quarterly Journal of

Economics, 117(3), 775–816,

RABIN, M. a VAYANOS, D., 2010. The Gambler’s and Hot-Hand Fallacies: Theory and

Applications. The Review of Economic Studies, 77(2), 730–778,

RONEY, C. J. R. a TRICK, L. M., 2009. Sympathetic Magic and Perceptions of Randomness: The

Hot Hand versus the Gambler's Fallacy. Thinking & Reasoning, 15(2), 197–210,

SERU, A., SHUMWAY, T. a STOFFMAN, N., 2010. Learning by Trading. Review of Financial Studies,

23(2), 705–739,

SIRRI, E. R. a TUFANO, P., 1998. Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows. The Journal of Finance,

53(5), 1589–1622,

SOLL, J. B., MILKMAN, K. L. a PAYNE, J. W., 2016. A User’s Guide to Debiasing. In Keren, G.

a Wu, G. (eds.). The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making.

Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1118468395.

TALEB, N. N., 2005. Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets.

New York: Random House. ISBN 0812975219.

TALEB, N. N. 2010. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable Fragility. New York:

Random House. ISBN 0679604189.

TROPE, Y. a LIBERMAN, N., 2003. Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421,

TVERSKY, A. a KAHNEMAN, D., 1971. Belief in the Law of Small Numbers. Psychological Bulletin,

76(2), 105–110,

van DE RIJT, A., KANG, S. M., RESTIVO, M. a PATIL, A., 2014. Field Experiments of Success-Breeds-

Success Dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(19),


van ROOIJ, M., LUSARDI, A. a ALESSIE, R., 2011. Financial Literacy and Stock Market

Participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 449–472,

VUL, E. a PASHLER, H., 2008. Measuring the Crowd Within: Probabilistic Representations Within

Individuals. Psychological Science, 19(7), 645–647,

WOHL, M. J. A. a ENZLE, M. E., 2002. The Deployment of Personal Luck: Sympathetic Magic and

Illusory Control in Games of Pure Chance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10),


YUAN, J., SUN, G.-Z. a SIU, R., 2014. The Lure of Illusory Luck: How Much Are People Willing to

Pay for Random Shocks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 106(C), 269–280,

Licence Creative Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.