Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2017, 2017(2):45-69 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.574

Measuring of National Competitiveness - Comparative Analysis of Visegrad Countries, Germany and Austria in Modified Porter's SD Model and 9F Model

Marta Nečadová
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Fakulta podnikohospodářská (marta.necadova@vse.cz).

The international competitiveness rankings can be seen as a way of evaluating countries' future economic potential and opportunities for further development and growth. The discussion of one clear definition of the term "national competitiveness" can be considered a "never-ending story" without an unambiguous generally accepted result. In every composite indicator analysis, the final index is the outcome of a number of choices: the framework (usually driven by theoretical models and experts' opinions), the indicators to be included, their normalisation, the weights assigned to each indicator, and the aggregation method. This paper is based on evaluating results of the Visegrad group countries (V4), Germany, and Austria. We take into account the sense and the methodology of Porter's Diamond model (SD model) and the Nine-factor model (9F model). The main aim of this paper is the identification of similarities and differences between these two models and the discussion of suitability of these models for countries with different economic characteristics.

Keywords: composite indicators, national competitiveness, 9F model, SD model, V4 comparison
JEL classification: E29, F43, O49

Published: April 4, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nečadová, M. (2017). Measuring of National Competitiveness - Comparative Analysis of Visegrad Countries, Germany and Austria in Modified Porter's SD Model and 9F Model. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia25(2), 45-69. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.574
Download citation

References

  1. BALCAROVÁ, P., 2014. The Comparison of Nine Factor Model and Diamond Model: Application for the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. Acta Academica Karviniensia, 17(1), 5-15. ISSN 1212-415X. Go to original source...
  2. BALCAROVÁ, P., 2016. Vybrané přístupy k měření a hodnocení konkurenceschopnosti zemí: aplikace na Evropskou unii [Disertační práce, online], [cit. 31. 8. 2016]. Brno: Mendelova Univerzita. Dostupné z: http://www.theses.cz/id/mtd68g
  3. DUTTA, S., LANVIN, B. a WUNSCH-VINCENT, S. (eds.), 2016. The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with Global Innovation, Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO. ISBN 979-10-95870-01-2.
  4. EUROSTAT, 2016. Database [online]. [cit. 31. 8. 2016]. Dostupné z: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/themes
  5. CHO, D. S. a MOON, H. CH., 2005. National Competitiveness: Implications for Different Groups and Strategies [online]. [cit. 31. 8. 2016]. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 1(1), 1-11. Dostupné z: http://s-pace.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/61988/1/2.pdf
  6. CHO, D.S. a MOON, H. CH., 2013. From A, Smith to M, Porter: Evolution of Competitiveness Theory. New Jersey: World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-4401-65-4. Go to original source...
  7. CHO, D.S. a MOON, H. CH., 2016. IPS National Competitiveness Research 2014-15. Created Advantage as the Source of Competitiveness [Powerpointová prezentace, online]. [cit. 31. 8. 2016]. The Institute for Industrial Policy Studies. Dostupné z: http://www.ips.or.kr/site/IPS_english/research/develop_04.aspx
  8. KLVAČOVÁ, E. A a MALÝ, J., 2008. Domnělé a skutečné bariéry konkurenceschopnosti EU a ČR, Praha: Vzdělávací středisko na podporu demokracie. ISBN 978-80-903122-8-9.
  9. KRUGMAN, P. R., 1994. Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 28-44, https://doi.org/10.2307/20045917 Go to original source...
  10. KRPEC, O. a HODULÁK, V., 2013. Konkurenceschopnost národních ekonomik - kritická reflexe konceptu. Politická ekonomie, 61(6), 752-769, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.929 Go to original source...
  11. LALL, S., 2001. Competitiveness Indices and Developing Countries: An Economic Evaluation of the Global Competitiveness Report. World Development, 29(9), 1501-1525, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00051-1 Go to original source...
  12. NEČADOVÁ, M. a SOUKUP, J., 2013. Kontroverzní pojem národní konkurenceschopnost a výsledky zemí V4 v mezinárodních žebříčcích konkurenceschopnosti (2007-2012). Politická ekonomie, 61(5), 583-604, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.918 Go to original source...
  13. NEČADOVÁ, M., 2015. Vybrané přístupy k měření národní konkurenceschopnosti. Výsledky zemí V4 v letech 2007-2014. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 23(2), 22-39, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aop.468 Go to original source...
  14. OCHEL, W. a RÖHN, O., 2006. Ranking of Countries - The WEF, IMD Fraser and Heritage Indices. CESifo DICE Report, 4(2), 48-60.
  15. PORTER, M. E., 1990. Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business School. ISBN 978-0875844190. Go to original source...
  16. RUGMAN, A. M. a D'CRUZ, R. J., 1993. The Double Diamond Model of International Competitiveness: The Canadian experience. Management International Review, 33(2), ISSN 0938-8249.
  17. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL, 2015. Corruption Perception Index [online]. [cit. 31. 8. 2016]. Dostupné z: http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview
  18. WORLD BANK, 2016. World Development Indicators [online]. [cit. 31.8.2016]. Dostupné z: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.