Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2018, 26(1):47-66 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.596

The Role of Technological Change in Income Inequality in the United States

Elena Deskoska, Jana Vlčková
University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of International Relations

This paper examines the impact of the technological change on income inequality in the United States of America. This is done by integrating theoretical and analytical findings of the channels through which technological change affects income inequality. The research is based on century-long income inequality data sets, although it prioritises the study of income inequality between the 1970s and the 2010s. The two major causes of rising income inequality have been technological change and globalisation. The paper also accounts for the other inequality triggers that have resulted from the political and economic structure of the country. The spread of automatisation and computerisation and of other changes associated with The Fourth Industrial Revolution are likely to reinforce skill-biased technological change. Therefore, new measures addressing income inequality, such as Universal Basic Income, are discussed.

Keywords: income inequality, technological change, fourth industrial revolution, USA, globalisation
JEL classification: F6, J40, O3, O40, O51

Published: February 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Deskoska, E., & Vlčková, J. (2018). The Role of Technological Change in Income Inequality in the United States. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 26(1), 47-66. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.596
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abramovitz, M. (1956). Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. In: Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., pp. 1-23.
    2. Acemoglu, D. and Autor, D. (2011). Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, 4(B), pp. 1043-1171, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5 Go to original source...
    3. Atkinson, B. A. (2015). Inequality: what can be done. Boston: Harvard University Press. Go to original source...
    4. Atkinson, B. A., Piketty, T. and Saez, E. (2011). Top Incomes in the Long Run of History. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), pp. 3-71, https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.1.3 Go to original source...
    5. Autor, D. H., Katz L. F. and Krueger, A. B. (1998). Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), pp. 1169-1213, https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555874 Go to original source...
    6. Baker, J. and Salop, S. (2015). Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Inequality. Georgetown Law Journal Online, 104(1), pp. 1-28.
    7. Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), pp. 223-251. Go to original source...
    8. BIEN (2016). Basic Income Earth Network, [online]. Available at: http://basicincome.org/basic-income/faq/#definition [Accessed 21 Aug. 2017].
    9. Bishop, C. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Singapore: Springer.
    10. Brynjolfsson, E. and McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    11. Cass, O. (2016). Why a Universal Basic Income is a Terrible Idea. [online] National Review. Available at: https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/06/universal-basic-income-ubi-terrible-idea [Accessed 21 Aug. 2017].
    12. Congressional Budget Office, (2011). Trends in the Distribution of Household Income Between 1979 and 2007, [online]. Available at: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/10-25-HouseholdIncome.pdf [Accessed 21 Aug. 2017].
    13. Davala, S., Jhabvala, R., Standing, G. and Mehta, S. K. (2015). Basic income: a transformative policy for India. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Go to original source...
    14. Ebenstein, A., Harrison, A., McMillan, M. and Phillips, S. (2014). Estimating the Impact of Trade and Offshoring on American Workers Using the Current Population Surveys. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4), pp. 581-595, https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00400 Go to original source...
    15. Council of Economic Advisers, (2016). Annual Report of the Council of Economic Advisers, [online]. Available at: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/economic_reports/2016.pdf [Accessed 22 Aug. 2017].
    16. Fajgelbaum, P. D. and Khandelwal, A. K. (2016). Measuring the Unequal Gains from Trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3), pp. 1113-1180, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw013 Go to original source...
    17. Feenstra, R. C. (2009). Offshoring in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    18. Freeman, R. (1995). Are Your Wages Set in Beijing? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(3), pp. 15-32, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.3.15 Go to original source...
    19. Frey, C. B. and Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    20. Gordon, N. (2014). The Conservative Case for a Guaranteed Basic Income. [online] The Atlantic. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/08/why-arent-reformicons-pushing-a-guaranteed-basic-income/375600 [Accessed 12 Aug. 2017].
    21. Greenstein, R. (2016). Commentary: Universal Basic Income May Sound Attractive but, If It Occurred, Would Likelier Increase Poverty Than Reduce It. [Blog] Huffpost. Available at: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-greenstein/commentary-universal-basi_b_10229506.html [Accessed 12 Aug. 2017].
    22. Hacker, J. and Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-take-all politics: How Washington made the rich richer - and turned its back on the middle class. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    23. Haskel, J. and Slaughter, M. J. (2002). Does the Sector Bias of Skill-biased Technical Change Explain Changing Skill Premia? European Economic Review, 46(10), pp. 1757-1783, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00185-4 Go to original source...
    24. Hetschko, C., Knabe, A. and Schöb, R. (2012). Identity and Wellbeing: How Retiring Makes the Unemployed Happier. [online] CEPR's Policy Portal. Available at: https://voxeu.org/article/how-retiring-makes-unemployed-happier [Accessed 21 Aug. 2017].
    25. Jorgenson, D. W. and Wessner, Ch. W., eds., (2006). Software, growth, and the future of the U.S. economy. Washington: The National Academies Press.
    26. Kemeny, T. and Rigby, D. (2012). Trading Away What Kind of Jobs? Globalization, Trade and Tasks in the US Economy. Review of World Economics, 148(1), pp. 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-011-0099-5 Go to original source...
    27. Keynes, J. M. (1963). Essays in persuasion. New York: Norton Library.
    28. Kogan, R. and Friedman, J. (2014). Ryan Plan Gets 69 Percent of Its Budget Cuts from Programs for People with Low or Moderate Incomes. [Blog] Huffpost. Available at: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-kogan/ryan-budget-gets-69-perce_b_5086544.html [Accessed 12 Aug. 2017].
    29. Korres, G. (2008). Technical change and economic growth: Inside the knowledge based economy. 2nd ed. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate.
    30. Krugman, P. and Sachs, J. (2015). Globalization, Technological Change, and Inequality: Jeffrey Sachs and Paul Krugman in Conversation. [video] Youtube.com. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_GtNgUxIJQ [Accessed 21 Aug. 2017].
    31. Krugman, P. and Obstfeld, M. (2011). International economics. 9th ed. London: Pearson Education.
    32. Krugman, P. (2012). Capital-Biased Technological Progress: An Example (Wonkish). [Blog] New York Times Blog. Available at: https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/26/capital-biased-technological-progress-an-example-wonkish [Accessed 23 Aug. 2017].
    33. Kurzweil, R. (2001). The Law of Accelerating Returns. [Blog] Kurzweil Accelerating Intelligence. Available at: http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns [Accessed 12 Aug. 2017].
    34. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), pp. 1-28.
    35. Lawrence, R. Z. and Slaughter, M. J. (1993). International Trade and American Wages in the 1980s: Giant Sucking Sound or Small Hiccup? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 24(2), pp. 161-226. Go to original source...
    36. Leamer, E. (1996). In search of Stolper-Samuelson effects on US wages. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Go to original source...
    37. Levy, F. and Murnane, R. (2014). The new division of labor: how computers are creating the next job market. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    38. Li, H. and Zou, H. (1998). Income Inequality is not Harmful for Growth: Theory and Evidence. Review of Development Economics, 2(3), pp. 318-334, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00045 Go to original source...
    39. Litchfield, J. A. (1999). Inequality: Methods and Tools. [online] World Bank. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPGI/Resources/Inequality/litchfie.pdf [Accessed 13 Dec. 2017].
    40. Mishel, L. and Gee, K.-F. (2012). Why Aren't Workers Benefiting from Labour Productivity Growth in the United States? International Productivity Monitor, Volume 23, pp. 31-43.
    41. Moravec, H. (1998). When Will Computer Hardware Match the Human Brain? Journal of Evolution and Technology, [online]. Volume 1. Available at: https://www.jetpress.org/volume1/moravec.htm [Accessed 3 Aug. 2017].
    42. Mooreslaw.org, (2016). Moore's Law. [online] Available at: http://www.mooreslaw.org [Accessed 5 Jan. 2017].
    43. OECDiLibrary, (2016). OECD-WTO: Statistics on Trade in Value Added, [online]. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/trade/data/oecd-wto-statistics-on-trade-in-value-added_data-00648-en [Accessed 3 Jan. 2016].
    44. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Go to original source...
    45. Piketty, T. and Saez, E. (2003/2016). Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), pp. 1-39, https://doi.org/ 10.1162/00335530360535135, (Tables and Figures updated to 2015 in Excel format, June 2016). [online] Available at: https://eml.berkeley.edu/~saez/#income [Accessed 5 Jan. 2017]. Go to original source...
    46. Romer, P. M. (1994). The Origins of Endogenous Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), pp. 3-22, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.3 Go to original source...
    47. Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: technology and economics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    48. Rymes, T. K. (1971). On concepts of capital and technical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    49. Sage, D. and Diamond, P. (2017). Europe's new social reality - the case against universal basic income. 1st ed. [pdf] Policynetwork.org. Available at: http://www.policy-network.net/publications/6190/Europes-New-Social-Reality-the-case-against-Universal-Basic-Income [Accessed 20 Aug. 2017].
    50. Samuelson, P. A. (1948). International Trade and the Equalisation of Factor Prices. The Economic Journal, 58(230), pp. 163-184, https://doi.org/10.2307/2225933 Go to original source...
    51. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    52. Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), pp. 65-94, https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513 Go to original source...
    53. Standing, G. (2001). Global Insecurity: Restructuring Social Income. [online] Guystanding.com. Available at: https://www.guystanding.com/files/documents/Global_insecurity_-_restructuring_social_income_2001.pdf [Accessed 4 Apr. 2017].
    54. Stiglitz, J. (2012). The price of inequality: How today's divided society endangers our future. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    55. Stiglitz, J. (2015). The Origins of Inequality, and the Policies to Contain it. National Tax Journal, 68(2), pp. 425-448, https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.2.09 Go to original source...
    56. Storper, M. and Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-Face Contact and the Urban Economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), pp. 351-370, https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027 Go to original source...
    57. Economist.com, (2016). After Moore's Law. [online] Available at: https://www.economist.com/technology-quarterly/2016-03-12/after-moores-law [Accessed 13 Apr. 2017].
    58. United States Department of Labor, (2015). A Look at Pay at the Top, the Bottom, and in Between, [online]. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2015/a-look-at-pay-at-the-top-the-bottom-and-in-between/home.htm [Accessed 23 Apr. 2017].
    59. Violante, G. (2008). Skill-Biased Technical Change, [online]. Available at: http://www.econ.nyu.edu/user/violante/Books/sbtc_january16.pdf [Accessed 14 Jan. 2017].

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content