Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2019, 27(2):21-37 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.619

Hybrid Orientation of Organizational Identity and Its Relation to Particular Organizational Components

Miloslava Hiršová, Lenka Komárková, Petr Pirožek
University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of Management (miloslava.hirsova@vse.cz).

In coping with organizational changes in the current turbulent environment, focus is primarily placed on structural, "hard" factors, while socio-dynamic processes, which are related to them, are somewhat overlooked. Organizational identity represents the output of processes of staff identification with the organization. We focus on four types of organizational identity orientation: team, working groups, individual and especially hybrid. The goal of this paper is to detect whether the presumed heritage of identity of the socialist organization - in the form of hybrid orientation - persists in the period of transition, and how this orientation relates to selected characteristics of organizations today. Our study is based on the questionnaire survey among 219 organizations and shows that hybrid orientation of identity is still present either directly or can be hidden behind the form of working groups. Results of multiple ordinal regression analysis demonstrate that hybrid orientation of identity prevails in organizations with weak organizational culture that can provide an environment for the manipulative enforcement of individual interests. Our study is an attempt to understand how differences in organizational design may be associated with the arrangement of social relations and be reflected in the form of organizational identity orientations. A better understanding of these processes can improve managerial decision-making in situations when the change of external conditions raises the change of internal settings.

Keywords: organizational identity, organizational culture, identity orientation, hybrid orientation of identity, contingency theory, social identity theory, social cognitive theory
JEL classification: D23, L20

Published: September 1, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hiršová, M., Komárková, L., & Pirožek, P. (2019). Hybrid Orientation of Organizational Identity and Its Relation to Particular Organizational Components. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia27(2), 21-37. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.619
Download citation

References

  1. Abdullah, M. M. B., Uli, J., & Tarí, J. J. (2008). The Influence of Soft Factors on Quality Improvement and Performance: Perceptions from Managers. TQM Magazine, 20(5), pp. 436-452. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730810898412 Go to original source...
  2. Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational Identity. In L. L. Cummings and M. M. Staw, eds., Research in Organizational Behaviour (pp. 263-295). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  3. Alvesson, M., & Empson, L. (2008). The Construction of Organizational Identity: Comparative Case Studies of Consulting Firms. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(1), pp. 16-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2007.10.001 Go to original source...
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
  5. Bandura, A. (1988). Organizational Application of Social Cognitive Theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13(2), pp. 275-302. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279067 Go to original source...
  6. Boaz, D. (1997). Libertarianism: A Primer. New York, NY: Free Press.
  7. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who Is This 'We'? Levels of Collective Identity and Self-Representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, pp. 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 Go to original source...
  8. Brickson, S. L. (2000). The Impact of Identity Orientation on Individual and Organizational Outcomes in Demographically Diverse Settings. Academy of Management Review, 25, pp. 82-101. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791604 Go to original source...
  9. Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational Identity Orientation: Making the Link between Organizational Identity and Organizations' Relations with Stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, pp. 576-609. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.50.4.576 Go to original source...
  10. Brickson, S. L. (2007). Organizational Identity Orientation: The Genesis of the Role of the Firm and Distinct Forms of Social Value. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), pp. 864-888. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275679 Go to original source...
  11. Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N., & Mezias, S. J. (2012). The Quest for Cognitive Legitimacy: Organizational Identity Crafting and Internal Stakeholder Support. Journal of Change Management, 12(2), pp. 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2011.645053 Go to original source...
  12. Brown, A. D., & Starkey, K. (2000). Organizational Identity and Learning: A Psychodynamic Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(10), pp. 102-120. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791605 Go to original source...
  13. Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), pp. 85-92. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474282932.0020 Go to original source...
  14. Clark, E., & Soulsby, A. (2012). Constructing Post-Socialism: Organisational Identity and the Experience of International Joint Ventures. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(2), pp. 257-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2011.646496 Go to original source...
  15. Clark, E., & Soulsby, A. (2007). Understanding Top Management and Organizational Change through Demographic and Processual Analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), pp. 932-954. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00692.x Go to original source...
  16. Cooper, D., & Thatcher, S. (2010). Identification in Organizations: The Role of Self-Concept Orientations and Identification Motives. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), pp. 516-538. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.53502693 Go to original source...
  17. Corley, K. G. (2004). Defined by Our Strategy or Our Culture? Hierarchical Differences in Perceptions of Organizational Identity and Change. Human Relations, 57(9), pp. 1145-1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704047141 Go to original source...
  18. Creed, G. W. (1995). The Politics of Agriculture: Identity and Social Sentiment in Bulgaria. Slavic Revue, 54(4), pp. 843-868. https://doi.org/10.2307/2501396 Go to original source...
  19. Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Go to original source...
  20. Donaldson, T., & Preston L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), pp. 65-91. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9503271992 Go to original source...
  21. Donnelly, J. H., Gibson, J. L., & Ivancevich, J. M. (1997). Management. Praha: Grada.
  22. Elstak, M. N., Bhatt, M., Van Riel, C. B. M., Pratt, M. G., & Berens, G. A. J. M. (2015). Organizational Identification during a Merger: The Role of Self-Enhancement and Uncertainty Reduction Motives during a Major Organizational Change. Journal of Management Studies, 52(1), pp. 32-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12105 Go to original source...
  23. Fiol, C. M., Pratt, M. G., & O'Connor, E. J. (2009). Managing Intractable Identity Conflicts. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), pp. 32-55. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.35713276 Go to original source...
  24. Gioia, D. A., Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Chittipeddi, K. (1994). Symbolism and Strategic Change in Academia: The Dynamics of Sensemaking and Influence. Organization Science, 5(3), pp. 363-338. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.3.363 Go to original source...
  25. Gioia, D. A., Shultz, M., & Corley, K. (2000). Organizational Identity, Image and Adaptive Instability. Academy of Management Review, 25, pp. 64-82. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.2791603. Go to original source...
  26. Harquail, C. V., & King, A. W. (2003). Organizational Identity and Embodied Cognition: A Multilevel Conceptual Framework [paper presented at Academy of Management Antal Meeting, Seattle, WA]. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2003.13792529 Go to original source...
  27. Haslam, S. A, Powel, C., & Turner, J. C. (2000). Social Identity, Self-Categorization and Work Motivation: Rethinking the Contribution of the Group to Positive and Sustainable Organizational Outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), pp.319-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00018 Go to original source...
  28. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  29. Haslam, S. A., & Ellemers, N. (2005). Social Identity in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Concepts, Controversies and Contributions. In G. P. Hodgkinson, J. K. Ford, eds., International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Volume 20 (pp. 39-118). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470029307.ch2 Go to original source...
  30. Haveman, H., & David, R. (2008). Ecologists and Institutionalists: Friends or Foes? In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, eds., Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 573-590). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  31. He, H., & Brown, A. D. (2013). Organizational Identity and Organizational Identification: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Group & Organization Management, 38(1), pp.3-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112473815 Go to original source...
  32. Jones, J., & Volpe, H. E. (2011). Organizational Identification: Extending our Understanding of Social Identities through Social Networks. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, pp. 413-434. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.694 Go to original source...
  33. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), pp. 1-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391211 Go to original source...
  34. Lewis, T. (2011). Assessing Social Identity and Collective Efficacy as Theories of Group Motivation at Work. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(4), pp. 963-980. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.555136 Go to original source...
  35. Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36, pp. 1175-1195. https://doi.org/10.2307/256809 Go to original source...
  36. Morton, M. S. S. (1991). Corporation of the 1990s - Information Technology and Organizational Transformation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  37. Plamínek, J. (2000). Synergický management [Synergic Management]. Praha: Argo.
  38. Pirožek, P. (2005). Management ziskových a neziskových organizací [Management Profit and Non for Profit Organizations, habilitation thesis]. Brno University of Technology.
  39. Qiu, J., Donaldson, L., & Luo, B. N. (2012). The Benefits of Persisting with Paradigms in Organizational Research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, pp. 93-104. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0125 Go to original source...
  40. R Core Team (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [online]. Available at: http://www.R-project.org [Accessed 17 Jan. 2019]
  41. Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  42. Schweiker, U. (1997). Beyond Leadership: Shifting Perspectives in Management Practice. European Journal of Work, 6(4), pp. 431-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943297399024 Go to original source...
  43. Soulsby, A., & Clark, E. (2007). Organization Theory and the Post-Socialist Transformation: Contributions to Organizational Knowledge. Human Relations, 60(10), pp. 1419-1442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707083470 Go to original source...
  44. Soulsby, A., & Clark, E. (2013). Organizational Restructuring and Change in Transition Societies: Dominant Coalitions and the Dynamics of Managerial Power and Politics. Competition and Change, 17(2), pp. 176-196. https://doi.org/10.1179/1024529413Z.00000000032 Go to original source...
  45. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  46. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In W. G. Austin, and S. Worchel, eds., The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  47. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour. In W. G. Austin, and S. Worchel, eds., The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  48. Trist, E. L. (1981). The Sociotechnical Perspective. In A. H. Van de Ven, and W. F. Joyce, eds., Perspectives on Organizational Behaviour. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  49. Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group. In H. Tajfel, ed., Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  50. Van De Ven, A. H., Ganco, M., & Hinings, C. R. (2013). Returning to the Frontier of Contingency Theory of Organizational and Institutional Designs. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), pp. 393-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.774981 Go to original source...
  51. Van Velsor, E., & Wright, J. (2013). What Do Next-Generation Leaders Look Like? Chief Learning Officer, 12(4), pp. 44-46.
  52. Vinsova, T., Pirozek, P., Pudil, P., & Komarkova, L. (2012). The Strength of Organizational Culture as a Key Organizational Performance Indicator. In Proceedings of the 3rd Review of Management and Economic Engineering (pp. 190-198). Cluj-Napoca: AMIER and Technical University of Cluj-Napoca.
  53. Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert and Whetten Revisited. Strengthening the Concept of Organizational Identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), pp. 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492606291200 Go to original source...
  54. Whetten, D. A., & Godrey, P. C. (1998). Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Go to original source...
  55. Whitley, R., & Czaban L. (1998). Ownership, Control and Authority in Emergent Capitalism: Changing Supervisory Relations in Hungarian Industry. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(1), pp. 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/095851998341215 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.