Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2019, 27(2):38-48 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.620

Financial performance of eponymous firms in the Czech Republic

Ondřej Machek, Martin Machek, Michele Stasa
Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, Prague (ondrej.machek@vse.cz, martin.machek@vse.cz, stam02@vse.cz).

Past literature suggests that firms that bear the name of the owners, also known as eponymous firms, have superior profitability. The goal of this paper is to test the differences in the financial performance indicators between eponymous and other Czech firms. In a sample of 17,833 privately held firms operating in the Czech Republic, owned by Czech individuals or families and having complete financial data for 2014-2017, we find that eponymous firms have a significantly higher return on assets. However, no difference in return on equity has been found. We also show that eponymous firms have lower asset turnover and labour productivity, use less debt financing and have greater liquidity. In this sense, their financial characteristics are close to those of family businesses. Overall, eponymous firms are younger than other firms, but there are no significant differences in the size of the firms. The results suggest that firms named after the founder are more likely to perform well.

Keywords: eponymous firms, financial performance, Czech Republic
JEL classification: M30, M31

Published: September 1, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Machek, O., Machek, M., & Stasa, M. (2019). Financial performance of eponymous firms in the Czech Republic. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 27(2), 38-48. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.620
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Allouche, J., Amann, B., Jaussaud, J., & Kurashina, T. (2008). The Impact of Family Control on the Performance and Financial Characteristics of Family Versus Nonfamily Businesses in Japan: A Matched-Pair Investigation. Family Business Review, 21(4), pp. 315-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865080210040104 Go to original source...
    2. Anderson, R., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding Family Ownership and the Agency Cost of Debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), pp. 263-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00067-9 Go to original source...
    3. Arbatskaya, M. (2007). Ordered Search. The RAND Journal of Economics, 38(1), pp. 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2007.tb00047.x Go to original source...
    4. Bach, L., & Serrano-Velarde, N. (2015). CEO Identity and Labor Contracts: Evidence from CEO Transitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33, pp. 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.009 Go to original source...
    5. Belenzon, S., Patacconi, A., & Zarutskie, R. (2016). Married to the Firm? A Large-Scale Investigation of the Social Context of Ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), pp. 2611-2638. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2441 Go to original source...
    6. Belenzon, S., Chatterji, A., & Daley, B. (2017). Eponymous Entrepreneurs. American Economic Review, 107(6), pp. 1638-1655. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141524 Go to original source...
    7. Belenzon, S., Chatterji, A., & Daley, B. (2019). Choosing between Growth and Glory. Management Science [online first]. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3296 Go to original source...
    8. Benos, E., & Jochec, M. (2013). Patriotic Name Bias and Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Markets, 16(3), pp. 550-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2012.10.002 Go to original source...
    9. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, pp. 82-113. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.82 Go to original source...
    10. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: Theoretical Dimensions, Assessment Approaches, and Agenda for Future Research. Family Business Review, 25(3), pp. 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355 Go to original source...
    11. Brockman, P., Lee, H. S., Megginson, W. L., & Salas, J. M. (2017). It's All in the Name: Evidence of Founder-Firm Endowment Effects. [online] clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu. Available at: http://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2017/04/20/its-all-in-the-name-evidence-of-founder-firm-endowment-effects [Accessed 2 Apr. 2019]
    12. Deephouse, D. L., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2012). Do Family Firms Have Better Reputations Than Non-Family Firms? An Integration of Socio-Emotional Wealth and Social Identity Theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), pp. 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12015 Go to original source...
    13. Dybvig, P. H., & Warachka, M. (2016). Tobin's Q Does Not Measure Firm Performance: Theory, Empirics, and Alternative Measures [online]. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1562444 [Accessed 2 Apr. 2019]
    14. Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2009). Extreme Governance: An Analysis of Dual-Class Firms in the United States. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), pp. 1051-1088. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp024 Go to original source...
    15. Green, T. C., & Jame, R. (2013). Company Name Fluency, Investor Recognition, and Firm Value. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3), pp. 813-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.007 Go to original source...
    16. Hanousek, J., & Jurajda, Š. (2018). Názvy společností a jejich vliv na výkonnost firem [Corporate Names and Performance]. Politická ekonomie, 66(6), pp. 671-688. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1218 Go to original source...
    17. Hnilica, J., Machek, O., & Lukeš, M. (2016). Are Family Firms More Stable? Evidence from the Czech Republic [conference paper]. Rencontres de St-Gall 2016 - Institutional Context and Governance of SMEs and Family Firms: Trends and Challenges. St. Gallen, 28. Aug. 2016 - 31. Aug. 2016. St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen.
    18. Jacobs, H., & Hillert, A. (2016). The Power of Primacy: Alphabetic Bias, Investor Recognition, and Trading Behavior. Review of Finance, 20(2), pp. 693-723. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfv060 Go to original source...
    19. Kashmiri, S., & Mahajan, V. (2010). What's in a Name? An Analysis of the Strategic Behavior of Family Firms. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27, pp. 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.04.001 Go to original source...
    20. Kashmiri, S., & Mahajan, V. (2014). A Rose by Any Other Name: Are Family Firms Named After Their Founding Families Rewarded More for Their New Product Introductions? Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), pp. 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1861-5 Go to original source...
    21. Lowrey, T. M., Shrum, L. J., & Dubitsky, T. M. (2013). The Relation between Brand-Name Linguistic Characteristics and Brand-Name Memory. Journal of Advertising, 32(3), pp. 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2003.10639137 Go to original source...
    22. Machek, O., & Hnilica, J. (2015). Hodnocení vlivu zastoupení rodiny ve vlastnické a řídící struktuře firem na jejich finanční výkonnost pomocí metody zkoumání shody párů [Evaluating the Impact of Family Presence in Ownership and Management on Financial Performance of Firms Using Matched-Pair Investigation]. Politická ekonomie, 63(3), pp. 347-362. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1007 Go to original source...
    23. McDevitt, R. C. (2014). "A" Business by Any Other Name: Firm Name Choice as a Signal of Firm Quality. Journal of Political Economy, 122(4), pp. 909-944. https://doi.org/10.1086/676333 Go to original source...
    24. Minichilli, A., Prencipe, A., Radhakrishnan, S., & Siciliano, S. (2018). What's in a Name? Eponymous Private Firms and Financial Reporting Quality. [online] ceibs.edu. Available at: http://www.ceibs.edu/node/16653 [Accessed 23 Mar. 2019]
    25. Stowe, J. D., Robinson, T. R., Pinto, J. E., & McLeavy, D. W. (2002). Analysis of Equity Investments: Valuation. Baltimore: AIMR.
    26. Vanden Bergh, B., Adler, K., & Oliver, L. (1987). Linguistic Distinction among Top Brand Names. Journal of Advertising Research, 27(4), pp. 39-44.
    27. Tadelis, S. (1999). What's in a Name? Reputation as a Tradeable Asset. The American Economic Review, 89(3), pp. 548-563. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.548 Go to original source...
    28. Zellweger, T. M., Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2010). Exploring the Concept of Familiness: Introducing Family Firm Identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), pp. 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2009.12.003 Go to original source...
    29. Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., Nordqvist, M., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Why Do Family Firms Strive for Nonfinancial Goals? An Organizational Identity Perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), pp. 229-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00466.x Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content