European Financial and Accounting Journal 2015, 10(2):13-32 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.139

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and its Reflections in the Literature

Petr Petera1, Jaroslav Wagner2
1 Ing. Petr Petera; Assistant Professor; Faculty of Finance and Accounting, University of Economics, Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague, Czech Republic; <petr.petera@vse.cz>.
2 doc. Ing. Jaroslav Wagner, Ph.D.; Associate Professor; Faculty of Finance and Accounting, University of Economics, Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague, Czech Republic; <wagner@vse.cz>.

Sustainability Reporting Guidelines published by the organization Global Reporting Initiative are gaining on importance and we were investigating whether this trend is also reflected in academic literature and if so, how. We conducted bibliometric analysis based on the Web of Science database to identify key articles, authors, journals and research topics. Results show that the amount of literature dealing with GRI Guidelines is growing. Major journals are Journal of Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management and Journal of Cleaner Production. High productive authors according to the number of authored or co-authored articles are Brown, H. S., Manetti, G., Evangelinos, K., Skouloudis, A., Searcy, C., Issac, B. and Modapothala, J. R. Research topics of these high productive authors are development of GRI as an institution, development of GRI Guidelines per se, methodologies for assessment of sustainability in organizations and composite indices, methodologies for evaluation and quality assessment of corporate responsibility reports, development of specific (e.g. sector-based) indicators and empirical investigation into indicators used in practice, stakeholder's role in the process of corporate responsibility reporting, assurance for corporate responsibility reports, exploring relation between quality of corporate sustainability disclosure and various variables, empirical content analysis and comparative content analysis of corporate sustainability reports and conceptual issues. We can conclude that the amount of relevant literature is growing and high productive authors and journals are emerging.

Keywords: Bibliometric analysis, Corporate social responsibility reporting, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
JEL classification: M40

Published: June 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Petera, P., & Wagner, J. (2015). Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and its Reflections in the Literature. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 10(2), 13-32. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.139
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Archel, P., Fernandez, M., Larrinaga, C., 2008. The organizational and operational boundaries of triple bottom line reporting: A survey. Environmental Management 1, 106-117. Go to original source...
    2. Asif, M., Searcy, C., Garvare, R., Ahmad, N., 2011. Including sustainability in business excellence models. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 7, 773-786. Go to original source...
    3. Asif, M., Searcy, C., dos Santos, P., Kensah, D., 2013. A Review of Dutch Corporate Sustainable Development Reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 6, 321-339. Go to original source...
    4. Azapagic, A., 2004. Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 6, 639-662. Go to original source...
    5. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Freeman, L. C., 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
    6. Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., Lessidrenska, T., 2009a. The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative: a case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics 2, 182-200. Go to original source...
    7. Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., Levy, D. L., 2009b. Building institutions based on information disclosure: lessons from GRI's sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production 6, 571-580. Go to original source...
    8. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., Vasvari, F. P., 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting Organizations and Society 4-5, 303-327. Go to original source...
    9. Clarkson, P. M., Overell, M. B., Chapple, L., 2011. Environmental Reporting and its Relation to Corporate Environmental Performance. Abacus-a Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies 1, 27-60. Go to original source...
    10. Dingwerth, K., Eichinger, M., 2010. Tamed Transparency: How Information Disclosure under the Global Reporting Initiative Fails to Empower. Global Environmental Politics 3, 74-96. Go to original source...
    11. Etzion, D., Ferraro, F., 2010. The Role of Analogy in the Institutionalization of Sustainability Reporting. Organization Science 5, 1092-1107. Go to original source...
    12. Evangelinos, K. I., Skouloudis, A., Nikolaou, I. E., Filho, W. L., 2009. An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainability Reporting Assessment in the Greek Banking Sector. In Idowu, Samuel O. - Filho, Walter Leal, eds. Professionals' Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility. Go to original source...
    13. Heidelberg: Springer, 157-173.
    14. Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A., 2008. Opportunities and Problems of Standardized Ethics Initiatives - Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 3, 755-773. Go to original source...
    15. GRI, 2014. What is GRI? Global Reporting Initiative. Available from: <https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/what-is-GRI/Pages/default.aspx>. [26 December 2014].
    16. Herzig, Ch., Schaltegger, S., 2006. Corporate Sustainability Reporting: An Overview. In Schaltegger, S. - Bennett, M. - Burritt, R., eds. Sustainability Accounting and Reporting. Heidelberg: Springer, 301-324. Go to original source...
    17. Chen, S., Bouvain, P., 2009. Is Corporate Responsibility Converging? A Comparison of Corporate Responsibility Reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics 1, 299-317. Go to original source...
    18. KPMG, 2011. KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. Available from: <http://www.kpmg.com/PT/pt/IssuesAndInsights/Documents/corporate-responsibility2011.pdf>. [26 December 2014].
    19. KPMG, 2013. The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2013. Available from: <http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/corporate-responsibility/Documents/kpmg-survey-ofcorporate-responsibility-reporting-2013.pdf>. [26 December 2014].
    20. Krajnc, D., Glavic, P., 2005. A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources Conservation and Recycling 2, 189-208. Go to original source...
    21. Levy, D. L., Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., 2010. The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance: The Case of the Global Reporting Initiative. Business & Society 1, 88-115. Go to original source...
    22. Lozano, R., 2006. A tool for a Graphical Assessment of Sustainability in Universities (GASU). Journal of Cleaner Production 9-11, 963-972. Go to original source...
    23. Lozano, R., Huisingh, D., 2011. Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production 2-3, 99-107. Go to original source...
    24. Lozano, R., 2013. Sustainability inter-linkages in reporting vindicated: a study of European companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57-65. Go to original source...
    25. Manetti, G., Becatti, L., 2009. Assurance Services for Sustainability Reports: Standards and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics 1, 289-298. Go to original source...
    26. Manetti, G., 2011. The Quality of Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Reporting: Empirical Evidence and Critical Points. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2, 110-122. Go to original source...
    27. Manetti, G., Toccafondi, S., 2012. The Role of Stakeholders in Sustainability Reporting Assurance. Journal of Business Ethics 3, 363-377. Go to original source...
    28. Modapothala, J. R., Issac, B., Jayamani, E., 2010. Appraising the Corporate Sustainability Reports - Text Mining and Multi-Discriminatory Analysis. In Proceedings of the Innovations in Computing Sciences and Software Engineering, 489-494. Go to original source...
    29. Moneva, J. M., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., Munoz-Torres, M. J., 2007. The corporate stakeholder commitment and social and financial performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems 1-2, 84-102. Go to original source...
    30. Mudd, G. M., 2008. Sustainability Reporting and Water Resources: a Preliminary Assessment of Embodied Water and Sustainable Mining. Mine Water and the Environment 3, 136-144. Go to original source...
    31. Perez-Batres, L. A., Miller, V. V., Pisani, M. J., 2010. CSR, Sustainability and the Meaning of Global Reporting for Latin American Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics 2, 193-209. Go to original source...
    32. Perez-Batres, L. A., Doh, J. P., Miller, V. V., Pisani, M. J., 2012. Stakeholder Pressures as Determinants of CSR Strategic Choice: Why do Firms Choose Symbolic Versus Substantive Self-Regulatory Codes of Conduct? Journal of Business Ethics 2, 157-172. Go to original source...
    33. Rasche, A., 2009. Toward a Model to Compare and Analyze Accountability Standards - The Case of the UN Global Compact. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 4, 192-205. Go to original source...
    34. Rasche, A., 2010. The limits of corporate responsibility standards. Business Ethics: A European Review 3, 280-291. Go to original source...
    35. Reynolds, M., Yuthas, K., 2008. Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 1-2, 47-64. Go to original source...
    36. Roca, L. C., Searcy, C., 2012. An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production 1, 103-118. Go to original source...
    37. Searcy, C., Buslovich, R., 2014. Corporate Perspectives on the Development and Use of Sustainability Reports. Journal of Business Ethics 2, 149-169. Go to original source...
    38. Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., Dikshit, A. K., 2007. Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry. Ecological Indicators 3, 565-588 Go to original source...
    39. Skouloudis, A., Evangelinos, K., Kourmousis, F., 2009. Development of an Evaluation Methodology for Triple Bottom Line Reports Using International Standards on Reporting. Environmental Management 2, 298-311. Go to original source...
    40. Skouloudis, A., Evangelinos, K., Kourmousis, F., 2010. Assessing non-financial reports according to the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines: evidence from Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production 5, 426-438. Go to original source...
    41. Skouloudis, A., Evangelinos, K., Moraitis, S., 2012. Accountability and stakeholder engagement in the airport industry: An assessment of airports' CSR reports. Journal of Air Transport Management 1, 16-20. Go to original source...
    42. Small, H., 1973. Co-citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship Between Two Documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 4, 265-269. Go to original source...
    43. Thorne, L., Mahoney, L. S., Manetti, G., 2014. Motivations for issuing standalone CSR reports: a survey of Canadian firms. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 4, 686-714. Go to original source...
    44. Waddock, S., 2008. Building a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives 3, 87-108. Go to original source...
    45. Willis, A., 2003. The role of the global reporting initiative's sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics 3, 233-237. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content