European Financial and Accounting Journal 2017, 12(3):65-86 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.188

Asset Classification, Subsequent Measurement and Impairment Testing for Carbon Emission Trading

Tharatee Mookdee1, Sheila Bellamy2
1 Uttaradit Rajabhat University, Faculty of Management Science, Department of Accounting, 27 Inchaimee Road, 53000, Uttaradit, Thailand.
2 RMIT University, College of Business, School of Accounting and Law, 445 Swanston Street, Melbourne, 3000, Victoria, Australia.

With global efforts to combat climate change, accountants from participating entities worldwide need to report the economic value of carbon credits and related assets in carbon markets. However, the absence of formal accounting guidelines allows the selection of accounting practices and reporting methods based on individual judgment. Also, emitters are allowed to invest in carbon credit projects and trading. These circumstances have led to diversity in global accounting practices. As accounting is an international business language in a global business world, it is important to study emerging accounting practices for carbon emission trading. The main aim of this study is, therefore, to explore the accounting practices (asset classification, subsequent measurement and impairment testing) of carbon credit providers/traders. Sample companies from Australian mandatory and voluntary carbon markets were selected. The study was conducted using case-study methodology and in-depth interviews, supported by archival and secondary data. It was found that the preferred asset classification of carbon credits varies among case-site participants, according to specific market requirements and economic uncertainty. Valuation methods differ across sites due to internal operations and economic factors. Impairment testing requires reference price indices determined by the nature of assets and professionals.

Keywords: Financial accounting, Emission trading, Emission rights, Accounting standards, EU ETS
JEL classification: M41

Published: December 11, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mookdee, T., & Bellamy, S. (2017). Asset Classification, Subsequent Measurement and Impairment Testing for Carbon Emission Trading. European Financial and Accounting Journal12(3), 65-86. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.188
Download citation

References

  1. Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), 2012. Regulatory Guide 236: Do I need an AFS license to participate in carbon markets? Australia, Available from: [25 August 2012].
  2. Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), 2015. Carbon markets Updated regulatory guidance, Australia. Available from: [5 December 2015].
  3. Balatbat, M., Wang, W., 2010. Voluntary disclosure of accounting policies for the treatment of carbon emission permits: The UK EUETS case', in GECAMB 2010: Corporate Social and Environmental Accounting Management Conference, Leiria, Portugal, October 14-15, 2010, Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research (CSEAR), Scotland, 1-30.
  4. Deloitte & Touche (Deloitte), 2009. Carbon Accounting Challenges: Are you ready? Deloitte Center for Energy Solutions, Washington D. C., US.
  5. European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), 2005. Re: Adoption of IFRIC 3 Emission Right, Brussels, Belgium. Available from: [2 January 2011].
  6. Elfrink, J., Ellison, M., 2009. Accounting for Emission Allowances: An Issue in Need of Standards. The CPA Journal 79, 68-71.
  7. Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF), 2003. EITF Abstract: Issue No.03-14, Financial Accounting Standards Board, USA.
  8. Gallego-Alvarez, I., Martínez-Ferrero, J., Cuadrado-Bellesteros, B., 2016. Accounting Treatment for Carbon Emission Rights, Systems 1, 1-15. DOI: 10.3390/systems4010012. Go to original source...
  9. Houpt, M., Ismer, R., 2011. Emissions Trading Schemes under IFRS - Towards a "true and fair view", Climate Policy Initiative, University of Erlangen - Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. Available from: [20 December 2011].
  10. IETA, PwC, 2007. Trouble-entry Accounting, Geneva, Switzerland. Available from: [18 September 2010].
  11. KPMG, 2012, Accounting for Carbon, September 2012. KPMG Insights: Blog. Available from: [24 October 2012].
  12. Lovell, H., Bebbington, J., Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C., 2010. Accounting for Carbon, ACCA, London.
  13. Raiborn, C., Massoud, M., 2010. Emissions Allowances: Accounting and Public Policy Issues, Accounting and the Public Interest 1, 105-121. DOI: 10.2308/api.2010.10.1.105. Go to original source...
  14. Steenkamp, N., Rahman, A., Kashyap V., 2011. Recognition, Measurement and Disclosure of Carbon Emission Allowances Under The EU ETS-An Exploratory Study, CSEAR 2011 Australasian Conference, Tasmania, AU.
  15. The New South Wales Greenhouse Gas Reduction Schemes (GGAS), 2010. IPART: Compliance and Operation of the NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme during 2009 - July 2010, Australia. Available from:, [25August 2010].
  16. Veith, S., Werner, J. R., Zimmerman, J., 2009, Competing Accounting Treatments for Emission Rights: A Capital Market Perspective, SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1323810. Go to original source...
  17. Warwick, P., Ng, C., 2012. The 'Cost' of Climate Change: How Carbon Emissions Allowances are Accounted for Amongst European Union, Australian Accounting Review 1, 54 - 67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2011.00158.x. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.