European Financial and Accounting Journal 2011, 6(4):60-84 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.20

Fiscal Instruments of a Support of the Families with Children and their Changes in Developed Countries

Leoš Vítek
Doc. Ing. Leoš Vítek, Ph.D. - associate professor; Department of Public Finance, Faculty of Finance and Accounting, University of Economics, Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czech Republic; <leos.vitek@vse.cz>.

Governments usually try to use fiscal instruments to support the families with children. However, fiscal instruments also affect the work effort and labour demand. Problems associated with (de)stimulantive effects of taxes, insurance premia and benefits arise, among other things, also due to the fact that because of various reasons, these instruments are not effectively coordinated and often operate in opposite directions. The article analyses changes in fiscal instruments of a support of the families with children in developed countries over the past decade and focuses on the development of selected tax-benefit indicators that describe the fundamental characteristics of the taxation of the families with children. Given that the universal, family-type social benefits often take the form of negative taxes, the paper includes also this type of family benefits. The results of the analysis show that the vast majority of developed countries strongly support the families with children via fiscal instruments. It also turns out that over the past decade the governments have rather reduced effective taxation of the families with children. During the last two years, however, some countries recorded an increase in the taxation of families, including the families with children. Countries that have over the past ten years successfully sought to support the families with children relied on progressive reliefs or benefits targeted at the families with more than two children.

Keywords: Family benefits, Support of the families with children, Taxes
JEL classification: E24, H24, J32

Published: December 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vítek, L. (2011). Fiscal Instruments of a Support of the Families with Children and their Changes in Developed Countries. European Financial and Accounting Journal6(4), 60-84. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.20
Download citation

References

  1. Alesina, A. - Ardagna, S. (2010): Large Changes in Fiscal Policy: Taxes versus Spending. Tax Policy and the Economy, 2010, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 35-68. Go to original source...
  2. Alesina, A. - Perotti, R. (1997): The Welfare State and Competitiveness. American Economic Review, 1997, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 921-39.
  3. Arltová, M. - Langhamrová, J. (2009): Analýza vztahů časových řad porodnosti a sňatečnosti v České republice v letech 1960-2007. Politická ekonomie, 2009, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 495-507. Go to original source...
  4. Behar, A. (2009): Tax Wedges, Unemployment Benefi ts and Labour Market Outcomes in the New EU Members. AUCO Czech Economic Review, 2009, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71-94. Go to original source...
  5. Carone, G. - Salomaki, A. (2004): Reforms in tax-benefit systems in order to increase employment incentives in the EU. Brussels, European Commission Economic Paper no. 160, 2004.
  6. Daveri, F. - Tabellini, G. (2000): Unemployment, Growth and Taxation in Industrial Countries. Economic Policy, 2000, vol. 15, no. 30, pp. 47-104. Go to original source...
  7. Dolenc, P. - Laporšek, S. (2010): Tax Wedge on Labour and its Effect on Employment Growth in the European Union. Prague Economic Papers, 2010, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 344-358. Go to original source...
  8. Fialová, K. - Mysíková, M. (2009): Labour Market Participation: The Impact of Social Benefits in the Czech Republic and Selected European Countries. Prague Economic Papers, 2009, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 235-250. Go to original source...
  9. Galuščak, K. - Pavel, J. (2005): Does Work Pay? Incidence of Unemployment and Incactivity Traps in the Czech Republic. European Economy, 2005, no. 2, pp. 179-192.
  10. Chewpreecha, U. - Píša, V. - Pollitt, H. - Ščasný, M. (2009): Analyzing Macroeconomic Effects of Environmental Taxation in the Czech Republic with the Econometric E3ME Model. Finance a úvěr, 2009, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 460-491.
  11. Jahoda, R. (2004): Interakce sociálního a daňového systému a pracovní pobídky. Praha, Výzkumný ústav práce a sociálních věcí, 2004.
  12. Kubátová, K. (2010): Daňová teorie a politika. Praha, Wolters Kluwer, 2010.
  13. Loužek, M. (2005): Makroekonomické aspekty porodnosti. Politická ekonomie, 2005, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 733-746. Go to original source...
  14. Loužek, M. (2010): Mikroekonomické základy reprodukčního rozhodování. Politická ekonomie, 2010, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 374-391. Go to original source...
  15. Moffitt, R. - Scholz, J. K. (2010): Trends in the Level and Distribution of Income Support. Tax Policy and the Economy, 2010, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 111-152. Go to original source...
  16. Nickell, S. (2003): Employment and Taxes. München, CESifo Working Paper No. 1109, 2003. Go to original source...
  17. OECD (2006): OECD Employment Outlook: Boosting Jobs and Incomes. Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2006.
  18. OECD (2009): OECD Employment Outlook: Tackling the Job Crisis. Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2009.
  19. OECD (2011): Taxing Wages 2009-2010. Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2011.
  20. OECD (2011a): OECD Tax Database. Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2011.
  21. Pavel, J. - Vítek, L. (2005): Mezní efektivní daňové sazby zaměstnanců na českém a slovenském pracovním trhu v období transformace. Politická ekonomie, 2005, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 477-494. Go to original source...
  22. Pavel, J. - Vítek, L. (2008): Revenue Neutral Environmental Tax Reform - Case of the Czech Republic. In: Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 757-781.
  23. Pavel, J. - Vítek, L. et al. (2010): Komparace daňových, pojistných a dávkových systémů ve vyspělých zemích (OECD) z hlediska jejich vlivu na odvodové zatížení nízkopříjmových domácností. Praha, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2010. Unpublished.
  24. Prescott, E. C. (2004): Why Do Americans Work So Much More Than Europeans. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 2004, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 2-13. Go to original source...
  25. Schneider, O. - Jelínek, T. (2001): Vliv českého sociálního systému a daňových úlev na rozdělení příjmů. Finance a úvěr, 2001, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 639-657.
  26. Schneider, O. - Jelínek, T. (2005): Distributive Impact of Czech Social Security and Tax Systems: Dynamics in Early 2000s. Prague Economic Papers, 2005, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 221-237. Go to original source...
  27. Sirovátka, T. - Žižlavský, M. (2003): Nezaměstnanost a pracovní pobídky. Politická ekonomie, 2003, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 391-406. Go to original source...
  28. Tvrdoň, M. (2008): Institucionální aspekty fungování trhu práce. Politická ekonomie, 2008, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 621-642. Go to original source...
  29. Večerník, J. (2007): The Czech Labour Market: Historical, Structural and Policy Perspectives. Prague Economic Papers, 2007, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 220-236. Go to original source...
  30. Vítek, L. - Pavel, J. (2007): Analýza distribuce mezních efektivních daňových sazeb v ČR s využitím SRU. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance [CD-ROM]. Praha, Oeconomica, 2007, p. 86.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.