European Financial and Accounting Journal 2011, 6(3):66-91 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.26

Evaluating the Quality of Rewards Systems

Petr Petera
Ing. Petr Petera - chief of controlling; Teplická strojírna s. r. o., Hřbitovní 723, 415 03 Teplice 3, Czech Republic; <petrpetera@volny.cz>.

This paper deals with the issue of desired characteristics of rewards systems and outlines possible ways of their evaluation. Aims of the rewards systems are analyzed and desired properties, components and updating procedures that should be put in place are identified. Rewards system is understood as a tool for supporting business's goals, attracting, motivating and retaining competent employees. It is stressed that rewards system is an important but not the only tool for reaching the mentioned goals and it should be used congruently with other tools (e.g. proper job design, recruiting, training, creating positive workplace). An encyclopedic preview of rewards types is given, their various classifications are introduced and it is underlined that type of chosen reward should match with the objective that is supposed to be accomplished. Finally, the impact of rewards on motivation and behavior is addressed and a framework for analyzing of incentives (variable payments for performance) is proposed.

Keywords: Motivation, Performance, Rewards
JEL classification: M52

Published: October 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Petera, P. (2011). Evaluating the Quality of Rewards Systems. European Financial and Accounting Journal6(3), 66-91. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.26
Download citation

References

  1. Armstrong, M. (2010): Armstrong's Handbook of Reward Management Practice: Improving Performance through Reward. London, Kogan Page, 2010.
  2. Armstrong, M. - Brown, D. (2010): Evidence-Based Reward Management: Creating Measurable Business Impact from Your Pay and Reward Practices. London, Kogan Page, 2010.
  3. Austin, R. - Gittell, J. H. (2007): Anomalities of Measurement: When It Works, but Should Not. In: Neely, A. D. (ed.): Business Performance Measurement: Unifying Theories and Integrating Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 449-476. Go to original source...
  4. Beel, J. (2007): Project Team Rewards: Rewarding and Motivating your Project Team. Scotts Valley, CreateSpace, 2007.
  5. Brown, M. G. (2008): Performance Metrics and Compensation. In Berger, L. A. - Berger, D. R. (eds.): The Compensation Handbook: A State-of-the-Art Guide to Compensation Strategy and Design. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2008, pp. 511-520.
  6. Cameron, J. - Pierce, W. D. (1994): Reinforcement, Reward, and Intrinsic Motivation: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 1994, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 363-423. Go to original source...
  7. Case, J. (2001): When Salaries Aren't Secret. Harvard Business Review, 2001, vol. 79, no. 5, pp.37-44.
  8. Deci, E. (1975): Intrinsic Motivation. New York, Plenum Press, 1975. Go to original source...
  9. Deci, E. - Koestner, R. - Ryan, R. (1999): A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. Psychological Bulletin. 1999, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 627-668. Go to original source...
  10. Frey, B. - Osterloh, M. (2005): Yes, Managers Should Be Paid Like Bureaucrats. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2005, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 96-111. Go to original source...
  11. Gagné, M. - Deci, E. (2005): Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2005, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 331-362. Go to original source...
  12. Gagné, M. - Forest, J. (2008): The Study of Compensation Systems through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory: Reconciling 35 Years of Debate. Canadian Psychology, 2008, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 225232. Go to original source...
  13. Griffin, R. - Welsh, A. - Moorhead, G. (1981): Perceived Task Characteristics and Employee Performance: A Literature Review. The Academy of Management Review, 1981, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 655664. Go to original source...
  14. Gross, S. - Friedman, H. (2004): Creating an Effective Total Reward Strategy: Holistic Approach Better Supports Business Success. Benefits Quarterly, 2004, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 7-12.
  15. Gross, S. - Bundy, K. - Johnson, R. (2011): The Ongoing Integration of Total Rewards. Employment Relations Today, 2011, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 11-17. Go to original source...
  16. Kerr, S. (1975): On The Folly of Rewarding A, while Hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 1975, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 769-783. Go to original source...
  17. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1979): Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs. Training & Development Journal. 1979, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 78-92.
  18. Kohn, A. (1993): Why Incentive Plans Cannot Work. Harvard Business Review, 1993, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 54-63.
  19. Lovewell, D. (2011): A Totally Rewarding Strategy. Corporate Adviser, 2011, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 39-42.
  20. Manzoni, J. F. (2008): On The Folly of Hoping for A Simply because You Are Trying to Pay for A. In: Epstein, M. J. - Manzoni, J. F. (eds.): Performance Measurement and Management Control: Measuring and Rewarding Performance. Bingley, Emerald JAI, 2008, pp. 19-41.
  21. Manzoni, J. F. (2010): Motivation through Incentives: A CrossDisciplinary Review of the Evidence. In: Epstein, M. C. - Manzoni, J. F. - Davila, A. (eds.): Performance Measurement and Management Control: Measuring and Rewarding Performance. Bingley, Emerald, 2010, pp. 19-63. Go to original source...
  22. Neely, A. D. - Adams, C. - Kennerley, M. (2002): The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success. London, Financial Times Prentice Hall, 2002.
  23. Osterloh, M. - Frey, B. (2007): Does Pay for Performance Really Motivate Employees? In: Neely, A. D. (ed.): Business Performance Measurement: Unifying Theories and Integrating Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 433-448. Go to original source...
  24. Penttila, C. (2009): The Salary Secret is Out. Entrepreneur. 2009, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 23.
  25. Pfeffer, J. (1998): Six Dangerous Myths about Pay. Harvard Business Review, 1998, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 109-119.
  26. Porter, L. W. - Lawler, E. E. (1968): Managerial Attitudes and Performance. Homewood, Irwin, 1968.
  27. Rai, S. (2004): Motivational Theories and Incentives Approaches. Indian Institute of Management Bangalore Management Review, 2004, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 43-50.
  28. Rappaport, A. (1998): Creating Shareholder Value: A Guide for Managers and Investors. New York, Free Press, 1998.
  29. Rousseau, D. (2006): Is There Such a Thing as "Evidence-Based Management"? Academy of Management Review, 2006, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 256-269. Go to original source...
  30. Rubino, J. (2008): Communicating Compensation Programs. In: Berger, L. A. - Berger, D. R. (eds.): The Compensation Handbook: A State-of-The-Art Guide to Compensation Strategy and Design. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2008, pp. 607-615.
  31. Scott, D. - Morajda, D. - McMullen, T. D. (2006): Evaluating Pay Program Effectiveness. WorldatWork Journal, 2006, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 50-59.
  32. Scott, D. - McMullen, T. D. - Sperling, R. S. (2006): Evaluating Pay Program Effectiveness: A National Survey of Compensation Professionals. WorldatWork Journal, 2006, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 47-53.
  33. Stewart, G. B. (1991): The Quest for Value: the EVATM Management Guide. New York, HarperCollins, 1991.
  34. Wagner, J. - Šoljaková, L. - Matyáš, O. (2007): Strategic Performance Measurement and Compensation Systems in the Czech Republic (Empirical study). European Financial and Accounting Journal, 2007, vol. 2, no. 3-4, pp. 8-26.
  35. WorldatWork (Organization) (2007): The Worldatwork Handbook of Compensation, Benefits & Total Rewards: A Comprehensive Guide for HR Professionals. New York, Wiley, 2007.
  36. Young, S. D. - O'Byrne, S. F. (2000): EVA and Value-Based Management: A Practical Guide to Implementation. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2000.
  37. Zingheim, P. K. - Schuster, J. R. (2000): Pay People Right! Breakthrough Reward Strategies to Create Great Companies. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2000.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.