European Financial and Accounting Journal 2012, 7(3):63-78 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.5

Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Czech Republic

Leoš Vítek
Doc. Ing. Leoš Vítek, Ph.D. - associate professor; Department of Public Finance, Faculty of Finance and Accounting, University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic; <leos.vitek@vse.cz>.

In 2007/2008, the Czech Republic has introduced governmental Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) to the central government level. This procedure has established formal rules binding to all legislative bodies. The process administration of RIA was entrusted to the Panel for a Regulatory Reform and Effective Public Administration and its permanent Committee for Quality Control of the Regulatory Impact Assessment. At the end of 2011, the RIA process has been changed and a new, independent Committee for the control of RIA proposals has been established. Based on minutes from the Committee's discussions, the presented paper analyses fundamental trends in the RIA process in the 2008-2012 period. The general statistical overview indicates that the volume of legislation reviewed under RIA gradually decreases. On the other hand, the number of proposals not recommended by the Committee for an approval decreased from 7.1 % in 2008 to 6.9 % in 2011. After introducing the new RIA rules, the number of proposals not recommended by the new Committee for an approval during the first discussion of a proposal has dramatically increased to 81 %.

Keywords: Czech Republic, Government policy, Regulation, Regulatory impact assessment
JEL classification: H83, L51

Published: October 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vítek, L. (2012). Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Czech Republic. European Financial and Accounting Journal7(3), 63-78. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.5
Download citation

References

  1. Blind, K (2012): The Influence of Regulations on Innovation: A Quantitative Assessment for OECD Countries. Research Policy, 2012, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 391-400. Go to original source...
  2. Coglianese, C. (2012): Evaluating the Impact of Regulation and Regulatory Policy. OECD Regulatory policy Expert Paper No. 1. Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2012.
  3. Cordova-Novion, C. - Jacobzone, S. (2011): Strengthening the Institutional Setting for Regulatory Reform: The Experience from OECD Countries. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 19. Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2011.
  4. De Francesco, F. - Radaelli, C. M. - Troeger, V. E. (2012): Implementing regulatory innovations in Europe: the case of impact assessment. Journal of European Public Policy, 2012, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 491-511. Go to original source...
  5. EC (2009): Impact Assessment Guidelines. SEC (2009) 92. Brussels, European Commission, 2009.
  6. EC (2010): Smart Regulation in the European Union. COM(2010)543. Brussels, European Commission, 2010.
  7. Gibbons, M. - Parker, D. (2012): Impact assessments and better regulation: the role of the UK's Regulatory Policy Committee. Public money & Management, 2012, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 257-264. Go to original source...
  8. Jacobzone, S. et al. (2010): Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Management Systems: Preliminary Statistical and Econometric Estimates. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance no. 17. Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2010.
  9. Kubíček, J. - Vítek, L. (2010): Hodnocení veřejných projektů z hlediska společenské míry diskontace. Politická ekonomie, 2010, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 291-304. Go to original source...
  10. Marneffe, W. - Vereeck, L. (2011): The meaning of regulatory costs. European Journal of Law and Economics, 2011, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 341-356. Go to original source...
  11. MV (2008): Hodnocení dopadů právní regulace - zkušenosti a poznatky ve státní správě a příklady dobré praxe za období od počátku roku 2008 [online]. Praha, Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic, [cited 11th September, 2012], <http://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/hodnoceni-dopadu-regulace-ria602648.aspx?q=Y2hudW09Ng%3d%3d>.
  12. MV (2009): Informace o realizaci hodnocení dopadů regulace (RIA) v legislativním procesu do 31. května 2008 [online]. Praha, Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic, [cited 11th September, 2012], <http://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/hodnoceni-dopadu-regulace-ria602648.aspx?q=Y2hudW09Ng%3d%3d>.
  13. MV (2009a): Zpráva o účinnosti Obecných zásad pro hodnocení dopadů regulace v roce 2008 [online]. Praha, Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic, [cited 11th September, 2012], <http://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/hodnoceni-dopadu-regulace-ria602648.aspx?q=Y2hudW09Ng%3d%3d>.
  14. MV (2011): Závěry jednání Grémia pro regulační reformu a efektivní veřejnou správu [online]. Praha, Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic, [cited 11th September, 2012], <www.mvcr.cz/clanek/zavery-jednani-gremia-748043.aspx>.
  15. Ochrana, F. (2005): Nákladově užitkové metody ve veřejném sektoru. Praha, Ekopress, 2005.
  16. OECD (2009): Regulatory Impact Analysis: A Tool for Policy Coherence. Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2009. Go to original source...
  17. OECD (2009a): Indicators of Regulatory Management systems, 2009 Report. Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2019.
  18. OECD (2010): Better Regulation in Europe - The EU 15 project. Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2010.
  19. OECD (2010a): Regulatory Reform for Recovery: Lessons from Implementation during Crises. Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2010.
  20. Parker, D. - Kirkpatrick, C. (2012): The Economic Impact of Regulatory Policy: A Literature Review of Quantitative Evidence. Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2012.
  21. Radaelli, C. - Fritsch, O. (2012): Evaluating Regulatory Management Tools and Programmes. OECD Regulatory policy Expert Paper No. 2. Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2012.
  22. Radaelli, C. M. (2010): Rationality, Power, Management and Symbols: Four Images of Regulatory Impact Assessment. Scandinavian Political Studies, 2010, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 164-188. Go to original source...
  23. Radaelli, C. M. (2010a): Regulating Rule-Making via Impact Assessment. Governance-Ai International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 2010, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 89-108. Go to original source...
  24. Saurwein, F. (2011): Regulatory Choice for Alternative Modes of Regulation: How Context Matters. Law & Policy, 2011, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 334-366. Go to original source...
  25. Staroňová, K. (2010): Regulatory Impact Assessment: Formal Institutionalization and Practice. Journal of Public Policy, 2010, vol. 30, pp. 117-136. Go to original source...
  26. UV (2007): Usnesení vlády České republiky č.877 o Obecných zásadách pro hodnocení dopadů regulace. Praha, Úřad vlády ČR, 2007.
  27. UV (2007a): Obecné zásady pro hodnocení dopadů regulace. Příloha k Usnesení vlády č. 877/2007. Praha, Office of the Government, 2007.
  28. UV (2012a): Obecné zásady pro hodnocení dopadů regulace (RIA). [on-line], Praha, Office of the Government, [cited 15th August 2012], <http://www.vlada.cz/assets/ppov/lrv/ria/metodiky/Obecne-zasadypro-hodnoceni-dopadu-regulace.pdf>.
  29. UV (2012b): Zápisy z jednání Komise pro hodnocení dopadů regulace v r. 2011 a 2012. [on-line], Praha, Office of the Government, [cited 9th October 2012], <http://www.vlada.cz/cz/ppov/lrv/ria/pracovni-komise/jednanikomise-pro-hodnoceni-dopadu-regulace-v-r-2012-97078/>.
  30. Vítek, L. (2010): Hodnocení dopadů vládních regulací. In Ochrana, F. - Pavel, J. - Vítek, L. et al.: Veřejný sektor a veřejné finance (financování nepodnikatelských a podnikatelských aktivit). Praha, Grada, 2010.
  31. Vítek, L. (2011): Hodnocení dopadů regulací (RIA). In Nekola, M. - Geissler, H. - Mouralová, M. (eds.): Současné metodologické otázky veřejné politiky. Praha, Karolinum, p. 306, 2011.
  32. Zhang, Y. F. (2010): Towards Better Regulatory Governance? Public Management Review, 2010, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 873-891. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.