European Financial and Accounting Journal 2009, 4(3):40-63 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.72

Fair Value Accounting and Measurement through FASB's Developments

Carmen Giorgiana Bonaci1, Jiří Strouhal2, Dumitru Matis3
1 Carmen G. Bonaci, Ph.D. - Lecturer; Babes-Bolyai University Cluj Napoca, FSEGA, Department of Accounting, Theodor Mihali 58-60, 400591 Cluj Napoca, Romania, .
2 Ing. Jiří Strouhal, Ph.D. - Senior Lecturer; University of Economics Prague, Department of Financial Accounting and Auditing, W. Churchill Square 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czech Republic; .
3 Prof. univ. dr. Dumitru Matis - Professor; Babes-Bolyai University Cluj Napoca, FSEGA, Department of Accounting, Theodor Mihali 58-60, 400591 Cluj Napoca, Romania; .

Our research follows the path of fair value as a term and concept, as well as its disclosure, measurement and recognition back from 1953 until our days, and analyzes the regulations issued by United States Accounting Standard setters, through the point of view of the historical events, which led to their appearance. Our study brings its' contribution to complementing growing literature on the value relevance of fair value, but focuses on the assessment of fair value as a financial reporting standard for financial instruments. The objective of the paper is to link the regulations with the historical events, which have guided them to their current shape and meaning. In doing so, we identified several key issues, which need to be analyzed, and through which we draw our conclusions after a closer analysis of SFAS's foresights. In financial reporting, United States and International Accounting Standard setters have issued several disclosures, measurement and recognition standards for financial instruments. We conclude our study noticing how all indications are that both standard setters mandate recognition of financial instruments at fair value, despite all fingers currently being pointed toward fair value as a "scape goat" for the recent events. The relevance of the study is emphasized when looking through the lens of the current financial crisis, derivative financial instruments being a central element. With Churchill's words and believe in our thoughts, "the deeper we can look into the past, the farther we'll see into the future" we plead for fair value assessment by underlying its advantages, while being aware of its limitations.

Keywords: Estimates, Fair value, Financial crisis, Hierarchy Level, Relevance, Reliability
JEL classification: M41

Published: October 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bonaci, C.G., Strouhal, J., & Matis, D. (2009). Fair Value Accounting and Measurement through FASB's Developments. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 4(3), 40-63. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.72
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Barth, M. E. (1991): Relative Measurement Errors among Alternative Pension Asset and Liability Measures. Accounting Review, 1991, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 433-463.
    2. Barth, M. E. - Landsman, W. R. (1995): Fundamental Issues Related to Using Fair Value Accounting for Financial Reporting. Accounting Horizons, 1995, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 97-107.
    3. Beeler, J. - Evans, A. - Turner, K. (2009): How Fair is Fair Value. [on-line], San Diego, Proceedings of American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 2009, vol. 16, no.1, 5 pp. [cit. 12th November, 2009], <http://asbbs.org/files/2009/PDF/B/BeelerJ.pdf>.
    4. Botosan, C. A. - Beatty, A. L. - Hopkins, P. E. - Nelson, K. K. - Venkatachalam, M. (2005): Response to the FASB's Exposure Draft on Fair Value Measurements. Accounting Horizons, 2005, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 187-196. Go to original source...
    5. Cairns, D. (2005): International Briefing Financial Reporting. Accountancy, 2005, vol. 130, no. 1308, p. 85-86.
    6. FASB (2007): Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 157 - Fair Value Measurements. Norwalk, Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2007.
    7. FASB (2009): Statement of Financial Accounting Standards. Norwalk, Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2007.
    8. FFIEC (2008): Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report). Arlington, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, 2008.
    9. Fishman, J. E. - Pratt, S. P. - Morisson, W. J. (2007): Standards of Value Theory and Applications. New York, Wiley, 2007.
    10. IASB (2007): International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). London, International Accounting Standards Board, 2007.
    11. Landsman, W. (1986): An Empirical Investigation of Pension Fund Property Rights. The Accounting Review, 1986, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 662-691.
    12. Miller, P. B. W. - Bahnson, P. R. (2007): Refining Fair Value Measurement. FASB 157 Upgrades the Quality of Financial Reporting. Journal of Accountancy, 2007, vol. 103, no. 11, pp. 30-36.
    13. Ratcliffe, T. A. (2007): The Finer Points of Fair Value FASB 159 opens up options. Journal of Accountancy, 2007, vol. 103, no. 12, pp. 30-36.
    14. Ronnen, J. (2008): To Fair Value or Not to Fair Value: A Broader Perspective. Abacus, 2008, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 181-208. Go to original source...
    15. Wolosky, H. (2007): Clarity, Transparency, and Ease of Comparability. Practical Accountant, 2007, vol. 40, no. 6, p. 6.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content