European Financial and Accounting Journal 2008, 3(4):45-69 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.89

Performance of Quoted and Non-quoted Companies in the Europe

Tomáš Buus
Ιng. Tomáš Buus, Ph.D. - assistant professor; Department of Corporate Finance and Valuation, Faculty of Finance and Accounting, University of Economics, Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czech Republic; <buust@vse.cz>.

Using 4-dimensional panel data (time, industry, country, companies) we examine the differences between European quoted and non-quoted companies at the level financial performance and some financial ratios. We find that quoted companies perform significantly better not only in terms of profit, but also in terms of cash flow generation. We also find some interesting differences in financial structure, liquidity and collection and credit period, not only from the perspective of quotation, but also between European regions (thus different trade habits), e.g. significantly longer credit period and collection period for countries with more relaxed trade habits (Spain, Italy, France). Our findings have some indirect implications for agency theory, for view of different accounting standards conservatism and earnings management, as well as (mainly) for business and stock valuation and financial planning.

Keywords: agency cost, Profitability, quotation
JEL classification: G12, G14, G39

Published: December 1, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Buus, T. (2008). Performance of Quoted and Non-quoted Companies in the Europe. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 3(4), 45-69. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.89
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alford, A. W. (1992): The Effect of the Set of Comparable Firms on the Accuracy of the Price-Earnings Valuation Method. Journal of Accounting Research, 1992, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 94-108. Go to original source...
    2. Bagnoli, M. - Watts, S. G. (2005): Conservative Accounting Choices. Management Science, 2005, vol. 51, no. 5 pp. 786-801. Go to original source...
    3. Basu, S. (1997): The conservatism principle and asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1997, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3-37. Go to original source...
    4. Beeks, W. - Pope, P. - Young, S. (2004): The Link between Earnings Timeliness, Earnings Conservatism and Board Composition: Evidence from the UK. Corporate Governance, 2004, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 47-59. Go to original source...
    5. Boulton, T. J. - Smart, S. B. - Zutter, C. J. (2007): Earnings Quality and International IPO Underpricing. [on-line], Social Science Research Network, 8th March, 2007, [cited 4th September, 2008], <http://ssrn.com/abstract=972694>.
    6. Brown, P. R. - Soybel, V. E. - Stickney, C. P. (1994): Comparing U.S. and Japanese Corporate-Level Operating Performance Using Financial Statement Data. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, vol. 15, no. 1, pp.75-83. Go to original source...
    7. Buus, T. (2004): Management and financing of working capital (in Czech: Řízení a financování pracovního kapitálu). Praha, University of Economics, Prague, 2004. Seminal work. Unpublished.
    8. Buus, T. (2007): Multibusiness companies valuation (in Czech: Oceňování koncernů). Praha, University of Economics, Prague, 2007. Dissertation thesis.
    9. Buus, T. - Brabenec, T. - Strouhal, J. (2007): Application of the Modern Methods of Valuation for Non-Listed Companies (in Czech: Aplikace moderních metod oceňování v případě nekotovaných společností - pracovní sešit). Praha, Oeconomica, 2007.
    10. Bykowsky, M. M. - Kwasnica, A. M. - Sharkey, W. W. (2005): Buyer Size and Bargaining Power: An Experimental Analysis [online]. University Park, Pennsylvania State University, c2005, [cited 19th March, 2008], <http://www.personal.psu.edu/amk17/BuyerSize.pdf>.
    11. Clark, T. E. - Van Wincoop, E. (2001): Borders and Business Cycles. Journal of International Economics, 2001, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 59-85. Go to original source...
    12. Clarke, R. - Davies, S. - Waterson, M. (1984): The ProfitabilityConcentration Relation: Market Power or Efficiency? Journal of Industrial Economics, 1984, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 435-450. Go to original source...
    13. Chipty, T. - Snyder, C. M. (1999): The Role of Firm Size in Bilateral Bargaining: A Study of the Cable Television Industry. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1999, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 326-340. Go to original source...
    14. Coffee, J. C. (2005): A Theory of Corporate Scandals: Why the U.S. and Europe Differ. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2005, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 198-211. Go to original source...
    15. Collins, D. W. - Kothari, S. P. (1989): An Analysis of Intertemporal and Cross-Sectional Determinants of Earnings Response Coefficients. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1989, vol.11, no. 2-3, pp. 143-81. Go to original source...
    16. Degeorge, F. - Zeckhauser, R. (1993): The Reverse LBO Decision and Firm Performance: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Finance, 1993, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1323-1348. Go to original source...
    17. Desai, H. - Hogan, C. E. - Wilkins, M. S. (2006): The Reputational Penalty for Aggressive Accounting: Earnings Restatements and Management Turnover. Accounting Review, 2006, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 83-112. Go to original source...
    18. Durand, R. - Vargas, V. (2003): Ownership, Organization, And Private Firms' Efficient Use of Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, vol. 24, no. 7, pp.667-675. Go to original source...
    19. Dyl, E. A. (1989): Agency, Corporate Control And Accounting Methods: The LIFOFIFO Choice. Managerial and Decision Economics, 1989, vol. 10, no. 2. pp. 141-145. Go to original source...
    20. Evans, J. - Poa, M. - Rath, S. (2005): The Financial and Governance Characteristics of Australian Companies Going Private. International Journal of Business Studies, 2005, vol. 13, no.1, pp.124.
    21. Fama, E. F. - French, K. R. (2000): Forecasting Profitability and Earnings. Journal of Business, 2000, vol. 73, no. 2. pp. 161-175. Go to original source...
    22. Fee, C. E. - Thomas, S. E. (2003): Sources of Gains in Horizontal Mergers: Evidence from Customer, Supplier, and Rival Firms. [on-line], Social Science Research Network, 23rd May 23, 2003, [cited 13th March, 2008], <http://ssrn.com/abstract=384900>. Go to original source...
    23. Ghosh, A. - Moon, D. (2005): Auditor Tenure and Perceptions of Audit Quality. Accounting Review, 2005, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 585-612. Go to original source...
    24. Hawawini, G. - Subramanian, V. - Verdin, P. (2003): Is Performance Driven by Industry- or Firm-specific Factors? A New Look at the Evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, vol. 24, no. 1, pp.1-16. Go to original source...
    25. Hertzel, M. - Lemmon, M. - Linck, J. S. - Rees, L. (2002): LongRun Performance Following Private Placements of Equity. Journal of Finance, 2002, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 2595-2617. Go to original source...
    26. Holl, P. (1975): Effect of Control Type on the Performance of the Firm in the U.K. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1975, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 257-271. Go to original source...
    27. Jagannathan, R. - McGrattan, E. - Scherbina, A. (2000): The Declining U.S. Equity Premium. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 2000, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 3-19. Go to original source...
    28. Jain, B. A. - Kini, O. (1994): The Post-Issue Operating Performance of IPO Firms. Journal of Finance, 1994, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 16991726. Go to original source...
    29. Kirchmaier, T. - Grant, J. (2005): Corporate ownership structure and performance in Europe. European Management Review, 2005, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 231 - 245. Go to original source...
    30. Kwon, Y. K. - Newman, D. P. - Suh, Y. S. (2001): The Demand for Accounting Conservatism for Management Control. Review of Accounting Studies, 2001, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29-51. Go to original source...
    31. Lieu, P. - Chi, C. (2006): How Much Does Industry Matter in Taiwan? International Journal of Business, 2006, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 387-402.
    32. Lowry, M (2003): Why does IPO volume fluctuate so much? Journal of Financial Economics. 2003, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 3-40. Go to original source...
    33. Machlup, F. - Taber, M. (1960): Bilateral Monopoly, Successive Monopoly, and Vertical Integration. Economica, New Series. 1960, vol. 27, no. 106, pp. 101-119. Go to original source...
    34. MacKinnon, J. G. - White, H. (1985): Some heteroskedasticityconsistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 1985, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 305325. Go to original source...
    35. Mehra, R. - Prescott, E. C. (2003): The equity premium in retrospect. In: Constantinides, G.M. - Harris, M. - Stulz, R. (ed.): Handbook of the Economics of Finance. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2003, pp. 887-936. Go to original source...
    36. Mull, R. H. - Winters, D. B. (1997): IPOs, Public Market Access, And Firm Capital Structure. Journal of Economics and Finance. 1997, vol. 20, no. 4 (Supplemental Issue), pp. 99-108.
    37. Nofsinger, J. R. (2005): Social Mood and Financial Economics. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2005, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 144-160. Go to original source...
    38. Peristiani, S. - Hong, G. (2004): Pre-IPO Financial Performance and Aftermarket Survival. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 2004, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1-7.
    39. Penman, S. H. (2003): The Quality of Financial Statements: Perspectives from the Recent Stock Market Bubble. Accounting Horizons, 2003, vol. 17, Supplement, pp. 77-96. Go to original source...
    40. Ritter, J. (2005): Economic growth and equity returns. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2005, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 489- 503 Go to original source...
    41. Schargrodsky, E. (2001): Do Publicly Traded Firms Price Differently from Private Firms? [on-line], [on-line], Social Science Research Network, 28th February, 2001, [cited 19th June, 2008], <http://ssrn.com/abstract=269492>. Go to original source...
    42. Schmalensee, R. (1985): Do Markets Differ Much? American Economic Review, 1985, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 341-351.
    43. Schreiner, A. (2007): Equity Valuation Using Multiples: An Empirical Investigation. Dissertation no. 3313. Wiesbaden, Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, 2007. Go to original source...
    44. Snyder, C. M. (1995): A Dynamic Theory of Countervailing Power. RAND Journal of Economics, 1995, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 747-769. Go to original source...
    45. Tucker, J. W. - Zarowin, P. A. (2006): Does Income Smoothing Improve Earnings Informativeness? Accounting Review, 2006, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 251-270. Go to original source...
    46. Valentincic, A. - Mramor, D. (2000): Forecasting the Liquidity of Very Small Private Companies. [on-line], Social Science Research Network, 2000, [cited 1st September, 2008], <http://ssrn.com/abstract=247328>. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content