Prague Economic Papers 2005, 14(1):51-63 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.252

Estimation of the Czech Republic Sacrifice Ratio for the Transition Period

Roman Hušek, Tomáš Formánek
University of Economics, 4, W. Churchill Sq., CZ - 130 67 Prague 3 (e-mail: husek@vse.cz).

Estimation of the costs of disinflation policy is usually done using the sacrifice ratio (SR) coefficient. This paper provides two alternative estimates of SR for the Czech economy. The estimates are based on relatively simple, but transparent and verified models, i.e. their vector autoregression and vector moving average representations. When we analysze our estimates of the Czech SR from the accuracy point of view, we see that the results are very sensitive to the way of definition of monetary shocks. Even though the individual estimates of the SR are generally not accurate enough for monetary policy decision making, there is a good probability that the Czech SR was negative during the transition period analysed, with relatively low absolute value. We may therefore assume that if the Czech National Bank decides to incur monetary restriction, such action would not have long-term significant negative impact on output.

Keywords: sacrifice ratio, impulse response (IR) function, Blanchard-Quah decomposition
JEL classification: C32, E31, E52

Published: January 1, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hušek, R., & Formánek, T. (2005). Estimation of the Czech Republic Sacrifice Ratio for the Transition Period. Prague Economic Papers14(1), 51-63. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.252
Download citation

References

  1. Amisano, G., Giannini, C. (1997), Topics in Structural VAR Econometrics (2nd ed). New York: Springer Verlag. Go to original source...
  2. Ball, L. (1994), "Credible Disinflation with Staggered Price-Setting." American Economic Review, 84, pp. 282-289.
  3. Ball, L. (1999), "Policy Rules for Open Economies", in Taylor, J., ed., Monetary Policy Rules. NBER Conference Report Series, Chicago University Press, pp. 127-156. Go to original source...
  4. Blanchard, O. J., Quah, D. (1989), "The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances." American Economic Review, 79, pp. 655-673. Go to original source...
  5. Cecchetti, S. G. (1994), "Comment", in Mankiw, N. G., ed., Monetary Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 188-193.
  6. Cecchetti, S. G., Rich, R. W. (1999), "Structural Estimates of the U.S. Sacrifice Ratio." Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  7. Corbo, V., Moreno, O., Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2001), "Assessing Inflation Targeting after a Decade of World Experience." Central Bank of Chile, mimeo. Go to original source...
  8. Fuhrer, J. C. (1995), "The Persistence of Inflation and the Cost of Disinflation." New England Economic Review (January/February), Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, pp. 127-159.
  9. Gali, J. (1992), "How Well Does the IS-LM Model Fit Postwar U.S. Data?" Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (2), pp. 709-738. Go to original source...
  10. Leitemo, K., Røste, O. B. (2003), "Measuring the Sacrifice Ratio: Some International Evidence." Norwegian School of Management (http://www.economics.no/preparation.htm#sacrifice).
  11. Shapiro, M. D., Watson, M. W. (1988), "Sources of Business Cycle Fluctuations", in Blanchard, O. J., Fisher, S.: NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111-148. Go to original source...
  12. Taylor, J. (1979), "Staggered Wage Setting in a Macro Model." American Economic Review, 69, pp. 108-113.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.