Prague Economic Papers 2006, 15(4):364-373 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.293

Third Moment of Yield Probability Distributions for Instruments on Slovenian Financial Markets

Srečko Devjak1, Andraž Grum2
1 Bank of Slovenia, Slovenska 35, 1505 Ljubljana (srecko.devjak@bsi.si).
2 Abanka Vipa d.d., Slovenska 58, 1517 Ljubljana (andraz.grum@abanka.si).

Due to the capital decree legislated by the Bank of Slovenia, Slovenian commercial banks can apply internal models for capital requirements calculation for currency risk and selected market risks (general position risk in line with debt and equity instruments, price change risk for commodities) as an alternative or in combination with standardised methodology. In risk management process banks consider the first and the second moment of a yield probability distribution as portfolio managers seek to achieve the best possible trade-off between risk represented by variance of returns and expected return. In cases when liquidity of instruments on financial markets is low, banks should consider also the third (skewness) and the fourth (kurtosis) moment of a yield probability distribution. All moments define the characteristics of yield probability distribution and therefore affect the risk measure value, being calculated on the basis of yield probability distribution function. The goal of this paper is to calculate the third moment of a yield probability distribution functions for a set of selected assets in financial market in Slovenia and to initiate implementation of a proper risk measure when yield distribution function is not elliptic.

Keywords: skewness, risk management, value at risk, bank, yield propability distribution function, risk aversion
JEL classification: C10, G21

Published: January 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Devjak, S., & Grum, A. (2006). Third Moment of Yield Probability Distributions for Instruments on Slovenian Financial Markets. Prague Economic Papers15(4), 364-373. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.293
Download citation

References

  1. Andersen T. G., Bollerslev T., Diebold F. X, Ebens H. (2000), "The Distribution of Stock Return Volatility". National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 7933. Go to original source...
  2. Acrebi C., Tasche D. (2002), Expected Shortfall: a Natural Coherent Alternative to Value at Risk. Economic Notes, (2), pp. 379-388. Go to original source...
  3. Campbell J. Y., Lo A. W., MacKinlay C. A. (1997), The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
  4. Devjak S. (2004), Optimisation of the Securities Portfolio as a Part of the Risk Management Process. Faculty of Economics. Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, June 2004 (1), pp. 81-91. Split: Management.
  5. Devjak S. (1997), Matematične metode v managementu. Statistika. Koper: Visoka šola za management Koper.
  6. Embrechts P., McNeil A., Straumann D. (2002), "Correlation and Dependency in Risk Management: Properties and Pitfalls". University of Haifa, Technical Report N 02-04. Go to original source...
  7. Ingersoll, J. E., Jr. (1987), Theory of Financial Decision Making. Rowman & Littlefield Pub lishers.
  8. Jorion, P. (2001), Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Controlling Market Risk, 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  9. Košmelj, B., Rovan, J. (1997), Statistično Sklepanje. Ljubljana: Ekonomska fakulteta.
  10. Nelson, Ch. R., Siegel, A. F. (1985), "Parsimonious Modelling of Yield Curves for U.S. Treasury Bills". Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 1594. Go to original source...
  11. Newbold, P. (1995), Statistics for Business and Economics, 4th Ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International.
  12. Poon Ser-Iluang, Granger, C. (2002), Forecasting Volatility in Financial Markets: A Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 41, (2), pp. 478-539. Go to original source...
  13. Yamai Yasuhiro, Yoshiba Toshinao: "On the Validity of Value at Risk: Comparative Analyses with Expected Shortfall". Bank of Japan: Monetary and Economics Studies, 2002 (1), pp. 57-86.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.