Prague Economic Papers 2009, 18(4):327-341 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.357

Testing the Validity of the Brown-Potoski Model in the Czech and Slovak Republics

Jan Pavel1, Emilia Sičáková-Beblavá2
1 University of Economics, Prague (pavelj@vse.cz).
2 Comenius University, Bratislava (ema@transparency.sk).

This paper is based on the new institutional economic approach, which focuses on analysis between services features (asset specificity, outcome measurability) and their eligibility to contract out. This issue, which de facto constitutes one of the subsets of the ""make or buy decision"" issue, is also analysed by the so-called Brown-Potoski model. It analyses the relations between selected features of a demanded service and its suitability or unsuitability for outsourcing, whilst making use of information about transaction costs economy.

Using data from 100 Czech municipalities and 100 Slovak municipalities, the viability of the Brown-Potoski model is tested. The results of the research show that a connection was identified between the measurability of the required service and its suitability for external provision, but the relationship between the specificity of investments and the suitability for external provision was not. The reason is probably the previous financial demands of the initial investment, which is, above all in the case of small municipalities, beyond their budgetary means.

Keywords: Czech Republic, Brown-Potoski model, public services, Slovak Republic, transaction costs
JEL classification: D23, H42, H72

Published: January 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pavel, J., & Sičáková-Beblavá, E. (2009). Testing the Validity of the Brown-Potoski Model in the Czech and Slovak Republics. Prague Economic Papers18(4), 327-341. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.357
Download citation

References

  1. Audit Commission (1995), Making Markets: A Review of the Audits of the Client Role for Contracted Services. London : HMSO.
  2. Bajari, P., Tadelis, S. (2001), " Incentives versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procuremet Contracts." Rand Journal of Economics, 2001, 32(3), pp. 387-407. ISSN 0741-6261. Go to original source...
  3. Beblavý, M. (2002), " Understanding the Waves Of Agencification And the Governance Problems They Have Raised In Central And Eastern European Countries." In OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 2, No. 1, Paris, 2002. Go to original source...
  4. Beblavý, M. (2007), "Costs of Corrution and Potencial Remedies from an Economic Point of View." Ekonomický časopis, 55(7), 2007.
  5. Brown, T. L., Potoski, M. (2002), "The Influence of Transaction Costs on Municipal Government Choices about Alternative Modes of Service Provision." Working Paper. Bloomington : Indiana University.
  6. Brown, T. L., Potoski, M. (2003), "Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2003, 13(4), pp. 441-468. ISSN 1053-1858. Go to original source...
  7. Brown, T. L., Potoski, M. (2005). "Transaction Costs and Contracting. The Practitioner Perspective." Public Performance and Management Review. 2005, 28(3), pp. 326-351.
  8. Cullis, J. G., Jones, P. R. (1987), Microeconomics and the Public Economy : A Defence of Leviathan. Oxford : Bash Backwell. ISBN 063115552X.
  9. Domberger, S., Rimmer, S. (1994), "Competitive Tendering and Contracting in the Public Sector: A Survey." International Journal of the Economics of Business, 1994, vol. 1, pp. 439-53. ISSN 1357-1516. Go to original source...
  10. Goméz-Ibáňez, J. A. (2003), Regulating Infrastructure. Monopoly, Contracts and Discretion. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674022386.
  11. Keating, J., Jr. (1990), "Public over Private: Monitoring the Performance of Privately Operated Prisons and Jails." In Macdonald, D., ed., Public Prisons and the Public Interest. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0813515748.
  12. Kerr, A., Radford, M. (1995), "CCT challenged." New Economy, 1995, vol. 2, pp. 36-41. ISSN 1070-3535. Go to original source...
  13. Medveď, J., Nemec, J., Orviská, M., Zimková, E. (2005). Public Finance. Bratislava: SPRINT. ISBN 80-89085-32-6.
  14. Nemec, J. (2002), "Contractual Securing of Public Services: Theoretical Bases and Practice in the Slovak Republic." Economic Journal, 2002, 50(6), pp. 9-11. ISSN 0013-3035.
  15. Nemec, J., Meričková, B., Vítek, L. (2004), "Contacting-out on Local Government Level. Transitional Economies: Theory and Selected Evidence from Czech and Slovak Republic." In The Eighth International Research Symposium on Public Management, Budapest, 2004.
  16. Oates, W. E. (1977), The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism. Lexington Books. ISBN 978-1856288484.
  17. OECD (2002), Competition and Eficiency in Publicly Funded Services. Paris: OECD Economic Studies, No.35, 2002/2. Go to original source...
  18. OECD (2006), Roundtable on Concessions. DAF/COMP/GF (2006)2.
  19. Ochrana, F. (2003), Public Choice and Public Expenditure Management. Prague: Ekopress. ISBN 80-86119-71-8.
  20. Ochrana, F. (2007), Public Services - their Delivering, Purchasing and Evaluation. Prague : Ekopress. ISBN 978-80-86929-31-6.
  21. O'Looney, J. A. (1998), Outsourcing State and Local Government Services. New York: Quorum Books. ISBN 1-56720-169-5.
  22. Pavel, J. (2005), "PPP Projects in the Czech Republic - a Chance or Risk?" Study. Prague: Transparency International Czech Republic.
  23. Savas, E. S. (1987), Privatisation: The Key to Better Government. Chatham: Chatham House. ISBN 0934540586.
  24. Sičáková-Beblavá, E., Beblavý, M. (2007), "Factors Influencing Decisions on Services Provision in Major Slovak Cities." Politická ekonomie, 2007, 55(2), pp. 245-262. ISSN 0032-3233. Go to original source...
  25. Williamson, O. (1981), "The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach." The American Journal of Sociology, 1981, 87(3), pp. 548-577. ISSN 0002-9602. Go to original source...
  26. Williamson, O. (1991), "Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives." Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991, 36(2), pp. 269-296. ISSN 1087-0091. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.