Prague Economic Papers 2010, 19(2):150-168 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.369

Do Investigations of Competition Authorities Really Increase the Degree of Competition? An Answer From Turkish Cement Market

Aydin Çelen1, Burak Günalp2
1 Turkish Competition Authority, 06800 Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey (acelen@rekabet.gov.tr).
2 Hacettepe University, Department of Economics, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey (gunalp@hacettepe.edu.tr).

In this paper, we assess the effects of the investigations carried by the Turkish Competition Board in 1997, 2002 and 2003 on the degree competition in the Turkish cement market. For this aim, we used proverbial Bresnahan-Lau framework with alternative definitions for the supply relation. Our first finding is that cement producers had a considerable amount of market power at the period prior to the first investigation in 1997. In addition, this study shows that, parallel to our initial expectation, competition in the cement market increased thanks to the investigations. The positive effect of the first investigation is found to be especially significant. Hence, this study witnesses that the enforcement of the competition law by the Turkish Competition Board has produced the desired effects in the most problematic sector with respect to competition law.

Keywords: market power, market performance, cement market, Bresnahan-Lau methodology, degree of competition, competition policy
JEL classification: D43, L13, L40, L61

Prepublished online: August 31, 2009; Published: January 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Çelen, A., & Günalp, B. (2010). Do Investigations of Competition Authorities Really Increase the Degree of Competition? An Answer From Turkish Cement Market. Prague Economic Papers19(2), 150-168. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.369
Download citation

References

  1. Bask, M., Lundgren, J., Rudholm, N. (2009), "Market Power in the Expanding Nordic Power Market."
  2. Bresnahan, T. F. (1982), "The Oligopoly Solution Concept is Identified." Economic Letters, 10, pp. 87-92. Go to original source...
  3. Buschena, D. E., Perloff, J. M. (1991), "The Creation of Dominant Firm Market Power in the Coconut Oil Export Market." American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, pp. 1000-1008. Go to original source...
  4. Choi D., Philippatos, G. C. (1983), "Financial Consequences of Antitrust Enforcement", Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, pp. 501-6. Go to original source...
  5. Çelen, A. (2003), "Measuring Degree of Competition in the U.K. Tea Market: a Dynamic Error Correction Approach." Rekabet Dergisi, 14, pp. 75-116 (in Turkish).
  6. Deodhar, S. Y., Sheldon, I. M. (1997), "Market Power in the World Market for Soymeal Exports." Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 22, pp. 78-86.
  7. Dickey, D., Fuller, W. A. (1979), "Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root." Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, pp. 427-431. Go to original source...
  8. Feinberg R.M. (1980), "Antitrust Enforcement and Subsequent Price Behaviour." Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, pp. 609-612. Go to original source...
  9. Konings J., Cayseele, P. V., Warzynski, F. (2001), "The Dynamics of Industrial Mark-Ups in Two Small Open Economies: Does National Competition Policy Matter?" International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, pp. 841-859. Go to original source...
  10. Kulaksizoglu, T. (2004), "Measuring the Effectiveness of Competition Policy: Evidence from the Turkish Cement Industry." Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) Paper No. 1092, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1092/.
  11. Lau, L. J. (1982), "On Identifying the Degree of Competitiveness from Industry Price and Output Data." Economics Letters, 10, pp. 93-99. Go to original source...
  12. Newmark, C. M. (1988), "Does Horizontal Price Fixing Raise Price? A Look at the Bakers of Washington Case." Journal of Law and Economics, 31, pp. 469-484. Go to original source...
  13. Shaffer, S. (1993), "A Test of Competition in Canadian Banking." Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 25(1), pp. 49-60. Go to original source...
  14. SPO (2008), Dokuzuncu Kalkinma Plani, 2007-2013: Taş ve Toprağa Dayali Sanayiler Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. Ankara: State Planning Organization. http://www.dpt.gov.tr/DocObjects/Download/3868/oik703-c1.pdf.
  15. Sproul M. F. (1993), "Antitrust and Prices." The Journal of Political Economy, 101(4), pp. 741-754. Go to original source...
  16. Stigler G. J., Kindahl, J. (1970), The Behaviour of Industrial Prices. New York: Columbia University Press (for NBER).
  17. Suominen, M. (1991), "Competition in Finnish Banking - Two Tests." Bank of Finland, Discussion Paper, No. 8/91.
  18. Symeonidis G. (2002), "The Effects of Competition: Cartel Policy and the Evolution of Strategy and Structure in British Industry." MIT Press. Go to original source...
  19. Whish, R. (2001), "New Economy, Old Competition Policy?" Paper presented at The Second Annual Conference on the Impact of Globalisation and New Technology on Competition, Competition Commission of South Africa, Lynwood Ridge, South Africa, 29-30 March, 2001.
  20. Zeidan R. M., Resende, M. (2009), "Measuring Market Conduct in the Brazilian Cement Industry: A Dynamic Econometric Investigation." Review of Industrial Organization, 34, pp. 231-244. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.