Prague Economic Papers 2013, 22(3):418-432 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.460

Curiosity of Pay-Per-Bid Auctions: Evidence from Bonus.cz Auction Site

Miroslav Svoboda, Petr Bocák
University of Economics, Prague, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3 (miroslav.svoboda@vse.cz).

This paper analyses the pay-per-bid auctions which have appeared recently on the Internet and scored an immediate business success. In these auctions bidders pay a small, but irrevocable fee each time they want to increase the price. In this paper we test the model suggested by Platt, Price and Tappen (2010), which forecasts the distribution of closing prices depending on the item's value, bid fee and price increment. The data from the Czech leading auction site Bonus.cz were chosen for the test. Observed closing prices distribution of about 69 % of commonly auctioned items fits the model. However, we find some theoretical and practical flaws in the model. Contrary to the model predictions, we observed that auctions with smaller price increments generated significantly higher revenue than auctions with higher price increments. We suggest that bidders who favour skewness in payoff distribution cause auctions with lower price increment run longer and therefore explain this discrepancy.

Keywords: skewness, risk, auction theory, pay-per-bid auction, auction modelling
JEL classification: C12, C51, D44, L81, L83

Published: January 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Svoboda, M., & Bocák, P. (2013). Curiosity of Pay-Per-Bid Auctions: Evidence from Bonus.cz Auction Site. Prague Economic Papers22(3), 418-432. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.460
Download citation

References

  1. Augenblick, N. (2009), "Consumer and Producer Behavior in the Market for Penny Auctions: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis." Unpublished manuscript, available at http://www.stanford.edu/~ned789/Augenblick_JMP_Penny_Auction.pdf.
  2. Baye, M. R., Kovenock, D., Vries, C. G. (1996), "The All-Pay Auction with Complete Information." Economic Theory, 8 (2): pp. 291-305. Go to original source...
  3. Byers, J. W., Mitzenmacher, M., Zervas, G. (2010), "Information Asymmetries in Pay-per-Bid Auctions." In Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on Electronic commerce. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: ACM, pp. 1-12. Go to original source...
  4. Cameron, A. C., Trivedi, P. K. (2005), Microeconometrics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Garrett, T. A., Sobel, R. S. (1999), "Gamblers Favor Skewness, not Risk: Further Evidence from United States' Lottery Games." Economics Letters, 63 (1): pp. 85-90. Go to original source...
  6. Golec, J., Tamarkin, M. (1998), "Bettors Love Skewness, Not Risk, at the Horse Track." The Journal of Political Economy, 106 (1): pp. 205-225. Go to original source...
  7. Hinnosaar, T. (2009), "Penny Auctions." Unpublished manuscript, available at http://toomas.hinnosaar.net.
  8. Maynard Smith, J. (1974), "The Theory of Games and the Evolution of Animal Conflicts." Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47 (1): pp. 209-221. Go to original source...
  9. Platt, B. C., Price, J., Tappen, H. (2010), "Pay-to-Bid Auctions." National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 15695. Go to original source...
  10. Shubik, M. (1971), "The Dollar Auction Game: A Paradox in Non-cooperative Behavior and Escalation." The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15 (1): pp. 109-111. Go to original source...
  11. Zandl, P. (2009), "Přicházejí: aukce s platbou za příhoz, letadlo či spíše loterie?" Retrieved February 15, 2011, from http://www.lupa.cz/clanky/prichazeji-aukce-s-platbou-za-prihoz/.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.