Prague Economic Papers 2015, 24(6):621-637 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.514

The Impact of the CCCTB Introduction on the Distribution of the Group Tax Bases Across the EU: The Study for the Czech Republic

Danuše Nerudová1, Veronika Solilová2
1 Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic (d.nerudova@seznam.cz).
2 Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic (ritve@email.cz).

The introduction of the CCCTB system in the European Union will have the impact on the redistribution of the group tax bases between the Member States and therefore also on the national budgets. The aim of the paper is to quantify the differences in the division of the MNEs group tax bases between the individual Member States in current situation - i.e. when applying separate entity approach and situation when CCCTB will be introduced - i.e. applying the allocation formula for sharing the tax base. The results show that the Czech Republic could gain in situation when CCCTB would be introduced in all EU Members States - the share in the group tax base would increase by 1.22%. A very slight increase was also indicated in the case of the Slovak Republic, Slovenia and Spain. On the contrary, the share in the group tax base was decreased in the case of Germany (by 1.36%), Estonia, Hungary and Poland. The results also indicate that there might be connection between the size of the country and the impact on the share of the tax base.

Keywords: tax base, sharing mechanism, group, Czech Republic, CCCTB
JEL classification: H25, K22

Published: January 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nerudová, D., & Solilová, V. (2015). The Impact of the CCCTB Introduction on the Distribution of the Group Tax Bases Across the EU: The Study for the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers24(6), 621-637. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.514
Download citation

References

  1. Agúndez-García, A. (2006), "The Delineation and Apportionment of an EU Consolidated Tax Base for Multi-jurisdictional Corporate Income Taxation: A Review of Issues and Options." European Commission, Working Paper No. 9/2006.
  2. Bettendorf, L., Van der Horst, A., de Mooij, R., Vrijburg, H. (2010), "Corporate Tax Consolidation and Enhanced Cooperation in the European Union?" Oxford University, Centre for Business Taxation, Working Paper No. 1. Go to original source...
  3. Bakker, A. (2009), Transfer Pricing and Business Restructurings. Amsterdam: IBFD.
  4. Cline, R. Neubig, T., Phillips, A., Sanger, C., Walsh, A. (2010), Study on the Economic and Budgetary Impact of the Introduction of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base in the European Union, Ernst & Young LLP.
  5. Djanani, CH., Brahler, G. (2006), Internationales Steuerrecht. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
  6. Devereux, M. P. (2004), "Debating Proposed Reform of the Taxation of Corporate Income in the European Union." International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 71-89. Go to original source...
  7. Devereux. M. P., Loretz, S. (2007), "The Effects of EU Formula Apportionment on Corporate Tax Revenues." Oxford University, Centre for Business Taxation, Working Paper No. 8
  8. Devereux. M. P., Loretz, S. (2008), "Increased Efficiency through Consolidation and Formula Apportionment in the European Union?" Oxford University, Centre for Business Taxation, Working Paper No. 12.
  9. Fuest, C., Hemmelgarn, T., Ramb, F. (2006), "How Would Formula Apportionment in the EU Affect the Distribution and the Size of the Corporate Tax Base?" An Analysis Based on German Multinationals, Deutsche Bank, Discussion Paper No. 1: Economic Studies. Go to original source...
  10. Goolsbee, A., Maydew, E. L. (2000), "Coveting Thy Neighbour's Manufacturing: the Dilemma of State Income Apportionment." Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 125-143. Go to original source...
  11. Gordon, R., Wilson, J. D. (1986), "An Examination of Multijurisdictional Corporate Income Taxation under Formula Apportionment." Econometrica, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 1357-1373. Go to original source...
  12. Hellerstein, W., McLure, CH. E. (2004), "The European Commission Report on Company Income Taxation: What the EU Can Learn from the Experience of the US States." International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 199-220. Go to original source...
  13. Jacobs, O. H. (2002), Internationale Unternehmensbesteuerung. Deutsche Investitionen im Ausland, Auslandische Investitionen im Inland. Munchen: Verlag C. H. Beck.
  14. Kumpf, W. (1976), Steuerliche Verrechnungspreise in internationalen Konzernen-Moglichkeiten zur Prazisierung des "dealing at arm´s length" Prinzips. Frankfurt am Main: Alfred Metzner Verlag GmbH.
  15. Lodin, S. O., Gammie, M. (2001), Home State Taxation. Amsterdam: IBFD.
  16. McDaniel, P. R. (1994), "Formulary Taxation in the North American Free Trade Zone." Tax Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 691-744.
  17. McLure, C. E. (1980), The Economics of Taxation, Brookings Institution, Washington D.C., pp. 327-346.
  18. Miller, B. F. (1984), "Worldwide Unitary Combination: The California Practice." In Charles, E. and McLure, Jr. (Ed.), The State Corporation Income Tax - Issues in Worldwide Unitary Combination. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
  19. Musgrave, P. (1972), "International Tax Base Division and the Multinational Corporation." Public Finance, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 394-413.
  20. Musgrave, P. B. (1984), "Principles for Dividing the State Corporate Tax Base." In Charles, E. and McLure, Jr. (Ed.), The State Corporation Income Tax - Issues in Worldwide Unitary Combination. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
  21. Mintz, J. M. (2004), "Corporate Tax Harmonization in Europe: It is all about Compliance." International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 221-234. Go to original source...
  22. Nerudová, D. (2011), Harmonization of the Tax Systems of EU Member States. Prague: WoltersKluwer.
  23. OECD (2001), Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations. Paris: OECD.
  24. Oestreicher, A. (2000), Konzern-Gewinnabgrenzung-Gewinnabgrenzung, Gewinnermittlung, Gewinnaufteilung. Munchen: Verlag C. H. Beck.
  25. Picciotto, S. (1992), International Business Taxation - A Study in the Internationalization of Business Regulation. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  26. Solilová, V., Nerudová, D. (2012), "The Effects of Changes in Transfer Pricing Policy of the Business Models in 21st Century." Proceeding of the 17th International Conference New Role of Public Finance. Prague: Wolters Kluwer ČR, a.s., pp. 247-257.
  27. Solilová, V., Nerudová, D. (2013), "Transfer Pricing: General Model for Tax Planning." Journal of Economics. Vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 597-617.
  28. Sorensen, P. B. (2004), "Company Tax Reform in the European Union." International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 91-115. Go to original source...
  29. Szarowská, I. (2010), "The Effect of Tax Burden on Economic Growth in the European Union." Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics 2010. České Budějovice: University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Economics.
  30. Vann, R. J. (1991), "A Model Tax Treaty for the Asian-Pacific Region?" Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 99-111.
  31. Weiner, J. M., Mintz, J. M. (2002), "An Exploration of Formula Apportionment in the European Union." European Union, Vol. 42, No. 8, pp. 346-351.
  32. Weiner, J. M. (1999), Using the Experience in the U.S. States to Evaluate Issues in Implementing Formula Apportionment at the International Level. U.S. Department of the Treasury OTA Paper 83.
  33. Weiner, J. M. (2005), "Formulary Apportionment and Group Taxation in the EU: Insights from the United States and Canada." Taxation Papers, Working Paper No. 8, DG Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.