Prague Economic Papers 2015, 24(4):473-481 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.525

Realism, Instrumentalism and the Time Aspect of Theory Building

Miroslav Svoboda
Anglo-American University; Jan Evangelista Purkyně University, Czech Republic (miroslav.svoboda@aauni.edu).

This paper contributes to the debate about the role of realism and instrumentalism in social science. It asserts that the debate should distinguish between ex-ante and ex-post perspectives. Ex-post, i.e. once the research is done, instrumentalism might be given priority because in this situation, significant predictive power is the key. On the other hand, ex-ante, i.e. before any model revealed its predictive power, only realism may give a hint of which direction is promising to pay off the effort. Thus both realism and instrumentalism play their role in the scientific activity, depending on the stage of the research. In this paper I argue that in order to develop economic realism, we should have recourse to phenomenology. Phenomenology analyses the thought constructs of ordinary people, classifies them and seeks the underlying invariant structure. Realistic social science should build on these invariant structures; only then the link to social reality is not lost.

Keywords: realism, phenomenology, instrumentalism, ex-post, ex-ante, economic methodology
JEL classification: A12, B41

Published: January 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Svoboda, M. (2015). Realism, Instrumentalism and the Time Aspect of Theory Building. Prague Economic Papers24(4), 473-481. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.525
Download citation

References

  1. Feyerabend, P. (1993), Against Method. 3rd Ed. London; New York: Verso.
  2. Friedman, M. (2008), "The Methodology of Positive Economics," in Hausman, D. M., ed., The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology, 3rd Ed., pp. 145-178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  3. Hausman, D. M. (1992), Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  4. Husserl, E. (1978), The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  5. Husserl, E. (1999), The Idea of Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Go to original source...
  6. Kuhn, T. S. (1996), The Structure of Scientifi c Revolutions, 3rd Edition, Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Long, R. T. (2006), "Realism and Abstraction in Economics: Aristotle and Mises versus Friedman." The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 3-23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12113-006-1012-2 Go to original source...
  8. Mäki, U. (1998), "Realisticness," in Davis, J. B., Hands, D. W., Mäki, U., eds., The Handbook of Economic Methodology, pp. 409-413. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  9. Mermin, N. D. (1990), "What's Wrong with this Pillow?" in Mermin, N. D., Boojums All the Way through: Communicating Science in a Prosaic Age, pp. 198-203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  10. Mises, L. von. (1963), Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, 4th Ed. San Francisco: Fox & Wilkes.
  11. Reiss, J. (2012), "Idealization and the Aims of Economics: Three Cheers for Instrumentalism." Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 363-383, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266267112000284 Go to original source...
  12. Rosenberg, A. (1998), "Folk Psychology," in Davis, J. B., Hands, D. W., Mäki, U., eds., The Handbook of Economic Methodology, pp. 195-197. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  13. Samuelson, P. A. (1938), "A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour." Economica, Vol. 5, No. 17, pp. 61-71. Go to original source...
  14. Schotter, A. (2008), "What's so Informative about Choice," in Caplin, A., Schotter, A., eds., The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics. A Handbook, pp. 70-94. New York: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  15. Schütz, A. (1967), Phenomenology of the Social World. USA: Northwestern University Press.
  16. Schütz, A. (1971a), "Common-Sense and Scientifi c Interpretation of Human Action," in Natanson, M., ed., Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, 3rd Edition, pp. 3-48, Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
  17. Schütz, A. (1971b), "Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences," in Natanson, M., ed., Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, 3rd Ed., pp. 48-66, Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
  18. Smith, B. (1996), "In Defense of Extreme (Fallibilistic) Apriorism." Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 179-192.
  19. Špecián, P. (2012), "Od Misese k Schutzovi. Otázka apriorismu v ekonomii." Politická Ekonomie, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 395-410. Go to original source...
  20. Spiegler, R. (2011), "But Can't We Get the Same Thing with a Standard Model?" Rationalizing Bounded-Rationality Models." Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 23-43. Go to original source...
  21. Svoboda, M. (2014), "Fenomenologie jako základ ekonomické metody." Politická Ekonomie, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 400-417. Go to original source...
  22. Weber, M. (2007), "The Nature of Social Action," in Runciman, W. G., ed., Max Weber: Selections in Translation, 22nd Ed., pp. 7-32, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.