Prague Economic Papers 2016, 25(4):381-395 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.573

Can the Taylor Rule be a Good Guidance for Policy? The Case of 2001-2008 Real Estate Bubble

Mateusz Machaj1,2
1 Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
2 Institute of Economic Sciences, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland

John Taylor (2009) argues that if the Federal Reserve had followed his famous monetary-policy rule, the severe recession that resulted from the real estate bubble could have been avoided. While one may agree with Taylor's empirical analysis and accept his demonstration that his proposed rule would lead to a more stable economic environment, it is unclear whether central banks are capable of avoiding bubbles by simply following the Taylor rule. One can construct various Taylor rules from the data. Some of those rules model what the Federal Reserve actually did. Following the specific type of Taylor rule recommended by John Taylor would in fact amount to a better monetary policy, but only because it calls for setting interest rates higher. In the second section, we introduce Taylor rules. In the third section, we apply these rules to monetary policy since 2001. The fourth section situates the Taylor rule in the Wicksellian framework of interest rates and macroeconomic stability. In the fifth section, we discuss the effects of policy rules on macroeconomic stability.

Keywords: Taylor Rule, monetary policy, crisis of 2008, business cycle theory
JEL classification: E3, E5

Published: January 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Machaj, M. (2016). Can the Taylor Rule be a Good Guidance for Policy? The Case of 2001-2008 Real Estate Bubble. Prague Economic Papers25(4), 381-395. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.573
Download citation

References

  1. Altig, D. (2003). Introduction: Recent Developments in Monetary Macroeconomics. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35(6b), 1039-1043. DOI: 10.1353/mcb.2004.0015. Go to original source...
  2. Altig, D. (2005). What's the Fed up to? Part 2. Available at: http://macroblog.typepad.com/macroblog/2005/06/whats_the_fed_u_1.html
  3. Ang, A., Dong, S., Piazzesi, M. (2007). No-Arbitrage Taylor Rules. NBER Working Paper 13448. DOI: 10.3386/w13448. Go to original source...
  4. Arnold, R. W. (2009). Challenges of Estimating Potential Output in Real Time. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 91(4), 271-290. Go to original source...
  5. Basu, S., Fernald, J. G. (2009). What Do We Know (and not Know) about Potential Output? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 94(1), 187-213. Go to original source...
  6. Batini, N., Nelson, E. (2002). The Lag from Monetary Policy Actions to Inflation: Friedman Revisited. Bank of England, External MPC Unit Discussion Paper No. 6.
  7. Bernanke, B. S. (2002). Deflation: Making Sure 'It' Doesn't Happen Here. Remarks by Governor before the National Economists Club, Washington, D.C.
  8. Bernanke, B. S. (2007). Opening Remarks to the Conference on John Taylor's Contributions to Monetary Theory and Policy. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Dallas, Texas.
  9. Blanchard, O. (1997). The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy: Comment. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12, 289-293. DOI: 10.2307/3585234. Go to original source...
  10. Brouwer, G. de (1998). Estimating Output Gaps. Economic Research Department, Reserve Bank of Australia Research Discussion Paper.
  11. Cahn, C., Saint-Guilhem, A. (2009). Issues on Potential Growth Measurement and Comparison: How Structural Is the Production Function Approach? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 91(4), 221-240. Go to original source...
  12. Carlstrom, C. T., Fuerst, T. S. (2007). Inertial Taylor Rules: The Benefit of Signaling Future Policy. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Policy Discussion Paper, pp. 193-203. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1024828. Go to original source...
  13. Claus I., Conway, P., Scott, A. (2000). The Output Gap: Measurement, Comparisons and Assessment. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Research Paper No. 44.
  14. Chagny, O., Döpke, J. (2001). Measures of the Output Gap in the Euro-Zone: An Empirical Assessment of Selected Methods. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 70(3), 310-330. DOI: 10.3790/vjh.70.3.310. Go to original source...
  15. Conway, P., Hunt, B. (1997). Estimating Potential Output: A Semi-Structural Approach. Working paper. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.321783. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.120.1483&rep=rep1&type=pdf Go to original source...
  16. Drew, A., Hunt, B. (2000). Efficient Simple Policy Rules and the Implications of Potential Output Uncertainty. Journal of Economics and Business, 52(1-2), 143-160. DOI: 10.1016/s0148-6195(99)00025-9. Go to original source...
  17. Ehrmann, M., Smets, F. (2003). Uncertain Potential Output: Implications for Monetary Policy. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 27(9), 1611-1638. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1889(02)00073-8. Go to original source...
  18. Giannoni, M. P., Woodford, M. (2003). How Forward-Looking Is Optimal Monetary Policy? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35(6b), 1425-1469. DOI: 10.1353/mcb.2004.0029. Go to original source...
  19. Gibbs, D. (1995). Potential Output: Concepts and Measurement. Labour Market Bulletin, 1995(1), 72-115.
  20. Goodfriend, M., King, R. G. (1997). The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12, 231-283. DOI: 10.2307/3585232. Go to original source...
  21. Hayek, F. A. (1931). Prices and Production, in Prices and Production and Other Works. F.A. Hayek on Money, the Business Cycle, and the Gold Standard. 2008. Auburn, Al: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  22. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
  23. Laubach, T., Williams, J. C. (2003). Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1063-1070. DOI: 10.1162/003465303772815934. Go to original source...
  24. Laxton, D., Tetlow, R. (1992). A Simple Multivariate Filter for the Measurement of Potential Output. Bank of Canada Working Paper. Available at: http://www.douglaslaxton.org/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/LT.pdf
  25. McGrattan, E. (1997). The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy: Comment. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12, 283-289. DOI: 10.2307/3585233. Go to original source...
  26. Meyer, L. H., Swanson, E. T., Wieland, W. V. (2001). NAIRU Uncertainty and Nonlinear Policy Rules. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 226-231. DOI: 10.1257/aer.91.2.226. Go to original source...
  27. Minsky, H. (1978). The Financial Instability Hypothesis: A Restatement. Thames Papers in Political Economy, Thames Polytechnic.
  28. Mishkin, F. S. (2007). Housing and the Monetary Transmission Mechanism. NBER Working Paper Series. DOI: 10.3386/w13518. Go to original source...
  29. Molodtsova, T., Nikolsko-Rzhevskyy, A., Papell, D. H. (2011). Taylor Rules and the Euro. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, 43(2-3), 535-552. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00384.x. Go to original source...
  30. Okun, A. M. (1962). Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance. American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Business and Economics Statistics Section.
  31. Orphanides, A. (1997). Monetary Policy Rules Based on Real-Tim Data. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Working Paper. Available at: http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/1998/199803/199803pap.pdf
  32. Orphanides, A. (1999). The Quest for Prosperity without Inflation. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
  33. Orphanides, A. (2001). Monetary Policy Rules Based on Real-Time Data. The American Economic Review, 91(4), 964-985. DOI: 10.1257/aer.91.4.964. Go to original source...
  34. Orphanides, A., van Norden, S. (2002). The Unreliability of Output-Gap Estimates in Real Time. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 569-583. DOI: 10.1162/003465302760556422. Go to original source...
  35. Orphanides, A., Williams, J. C. (2007). Inflation Targeting under Imperfect Knowledge. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.910905. Go to original source...
  36. Pindyck, R. S., Rubinfeld, D. L. (1997). Microeconomics. New York: Prentice Hall Business Publishing.
  37. Primiceri, B., Schaumburg, E., Tambalotti, A. (2006). Intertemporal Disturbances. NBER Working Paper Series. DOI: 10.3386/w12243. Go to original source...
  38. Reisman, G. (2004). The Value of "Final Products" Counts Only Itself. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63(3), 609-625. DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2004.00306.x. Go to original source...
  39. Salerno, J. (2012). A Reformulation of Austrian Business Cycle Theory in Light of the Financial Crisis. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 15(1). Go to original source...
  40. Selgin, G. (1997). Less than Zero. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
  41. Smets, F. (1998). Output Gap Uncertainty: Does It Matter for the Taylor Rule? Basle, Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements, Monetary and Economic Department. Go to original source...
  42. Smith, J. K. (2005). Inflation Targeting and Core Inflation. The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'Economique, 38(3), 1018-1036. DOI: 10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00314.x. Go to original source...
  43. Svensson, L. E. O. (2003). What Is Wrong with Taylor Rules? Using Judgment in Monetary Policy through Targeting Rules. NBER Working Paper 9421. DOI: 10.3386/w9421. Go to original source...
  44. Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39(1), 195-214. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-l. Go to original source...
  45. Taylor, J. B. (1995). The Monetary Transmission Mechanism: An Empirical Framework. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 11-26. DOI: 10.1257/jep.9.4.11. Go to original source...
  46. Taylor, J. B. (2009). Economic Policy and the Financial Crises: An Empirical Analysis of What Went Wrong. Critical Review, 21(2-3), 341-364. DOI: 10.1080/08913810902974865. Go to original source...
  47. Walsh, C. E. (2003). Speed Limit Policies: The Output Gap and Optimal Monetary Policy. The American Economic Review, 93(1), 265-278. DOI: 10.1257/000282803321455278. Go to original source...
  48. Woodford, M. (1999). Optimal Monetary Policy Inertia. NBER Working Paper 7261. DOI: 10.3386/w7261. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w7261 Go to original source...
  49. Woodford, M. (2001). The Taylor Rule and Optimal Monetary Policy. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 232-237. DOI: 10.1257/aer.91.2.232. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.