Prague Economic Papers 2016, 25(5):577-590 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.575

Versioning Goods and Joint Purchase: Substitution and Complementarity Strategies

Francisco Martínez-Sánchez
Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain (fms@um.es).

In the present paper, we develop a monopoly model of vertical product differentiation for analysing the monopolist's decision about the possibility of versioning goods as substitutes or complements when consumers can buy them simultaneously. In this context, we find that versioning goods as substitutes or complements is optimal for the monopolist if the cost of designing the bundle (the purchase of one unit of each version) is increasing, which implies that making variants of closer substitutes reduces costs. However, if making variants of closer substitutes is costly, the monopolist versions goods as complements only. The final result also depends on the degree of concavity and convexity of the cost function.

Keywords: market segmentation, price discrimination, complementarity, substitutes, joint purchase option, versioning information goods
JEL classification: L10, L12, L15

Published: January 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Martínez-Sánchez, F. (2016). Versioning Goods and Joint Purchase: Substitution and Complementarity Strategies. Prague Economic Papers, 25(5), 577-590. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.575
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Akcay, Y., H. P. Natarajan and S. H. Xu (2010). Joint Dynamic Pricing of Multiple Perishable Products under Consumer Choice. Management Science, 56 (8), 1345-1361. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1178. Go to original source...
    2. Belleflamme, P. (2005). Versioning in the Information Economy: Theory and Applications. CESifo Economic Studies, 51 (2-3), 329-358. DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/51.2-3.329. Go to original source...
    3. Bhargava, H. K., Choudhary V. (2008). Research Note: When Is Versioning Optimal for Information Goods? Management Science, 54 (5), pp. 1029-1035. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0773. Go to original source...
    4. Calzada, J. and T. Valletti (2012). Intertemporal Movie Distribution: Versioning When Customers Can Buy Both Versions. Marketing Science, 31(4), 649-667. DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1120.0716. Go to original source...
    5. Deneckere, R. J., McAfee, R. P. (1996). Damaged Goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 5 (2), 149-174. Go to original source...
    6. Gabszewicz, J. J., Sonnac, N., Wauthy X. (2001). On Price Competition with Complementary Goods. Economics Letters, 70(3), 431-437. DOI:10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00383-9. Go to original source...
    7. Gabszewicz, J. J., Wauthy X. (2003). The Option of Joint Purchase in Vertically Differentiated Markets. Economic Theory, 22(4), 817-829. DOI:10.1007/s00199-003-0359-2. Go to original source...
    8. Jing, B., (2007). Network Externality and Market Segmentation in a Monopoly. Economics Letter, 95(1), 7-13. DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2006.08.033. Go to original source...
    9. Motta, M., (1993). Endogenous Quality Choice: Price vs. Quantity Competition. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 41(2), 113-131. DOI: 10.2307/2950431 Go to original source...
    10. Mussa, M., Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and Product Quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18(2), 301-317. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0531(78)90085-6. Go to original source...
    11. Nalebuff, B., Ayres, I. (2003). Why Not? How to Use Everyday Ingenuity to Solve Problems Big and Small, Harvard Business School Press.
    12. Salant, S.W. (1989). When Is Inducing Self-Selection Suboptimal for a Monopolist? Quaterly Journal of Economics, 104 (2), 391-397. DOI: 10.2307/2937854. Go to original source...
    13. Shivendu, S. and Z. Zhang, (2012). Vertically Differentiated Markets with Costly UnderProvisioning: The Case of Versioning in Software Industry, Working paper, U. C. Irvine. Go to original source...
    14. Stokey, N. (1979). Intertemporal Price Discrimination. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 93(3), 355-371. Go to original source...
    15. Varian, H. R. (2001a). Markets for Information Goods, in Okina, K., ed., Monetary Policy in a World of Knowledge-Based Growth, Quality Change and Uncertain Measurement. Macmillan Press.
    16. Varian, H. R. (2001b). Versioning Information Goods, in Kahin, B., Varian, H. R. eds., Internet Publishing and Beyond: The Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property. MIT Press.
    17. Wei, X. and Nault, B. R. (2014). Monopoly Versioning of Information Goods When Consumers Have Group Tastes. Production and Operations Management, 23 (6), 1067-1081. DOI: 10.1111/poms.12180. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content