Prague Economic Papers 2017, 26(3):330-344 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.609

The Effect of Ethics on Banks Financial Performance

Radek Halamka1, Petr Teplý2
1 Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic (radek.halamka@gmail.com)
2 Department of Banking and Insurance, Faculty of Finance and Accounting, University of Economics in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic (petr.teply@vse.cz)

In this paper, we contribute to the literature focusing on ethics in banking from both theoretical and empirical point of view. We argue that the recent business of the global banking industry is not sustainable and we believe that ethical banking may represent one of the alternative models. In the empirical section, we investigate how ethics in the banking business models affects their financial performance. We identified 69 ethical banks and compared them with conventional banks using Bankscope data of more than 80,000 bank-year observations for the 2003-2013 period. We apply the Within-Between estimation method to bank financial indicators of Return on Assets, Return on Equity and their respective volatilities. We conclude that ethical banks report significantly lower volatility in Return on Equity than their conventional counterparts. In addition, the hypothesis that ethical banks would have higher profitability than their peers is not rejected.

Keywords: bank, ethics, financial performance, bank business models, profitability
JEL classification: A13, B12, B16, G21, Q56

Published: June 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Halamka, R., & Teplý, P. (2017). The Effect of Ethics on Banks Financial Performance. Prague Economic Papers26(3), 330-344. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.609
Download citation

References

  1. Acharya, V. A. et al. (2010). Regulating Wall Street: The Dodd-Frank Act and the New Architecture of Global Finance. New York: WILEY FINANCE. Go to original source...
  2. Ayadi, R., De Groen, W. P. (2014). Banking Business Models Monitor 2014. Centre for European Policy Studies.
  3. Bell, A., Jones, K. (2015). Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133-153, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7 Go to original source...
  4. Bhattacharya, C., Sen, S., Daniel, K. (2008). Using Corporate Social Responsibility to Win the War for Talent. MIT Sloan Management Review.
  5. BNP Paribas (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility Report: Working Together as a Responsible Bank. BNP Paribas.
  6. Bongini, P., Nieri, L., Pelagatti, M. (2015). The Importance of Being Systemically Important Financial Institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 50, 562-574, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.07.006 Go to original source...
  7. Dyllick, T., Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130-141, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.323 Go to original source...
  8. EBF (2015). Driving the Digital/ Transformation the EBF Blueprint for Digital Banking and Policy Change? The European Banking Federation. Available at: http://www.ebfdigitalbanking.eu
  9. Global Alliance for Banking on Values (2014). Real Economy - Real Returns: The Business Case for Sustainability Focused Banking. Global Alliance for Banking on Values.
  10. Gould, W. (2001). What Is the Between Estimator? StataCorp. Available at: http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/between-estimator
  11. Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions with Cross-Sectional Dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281-312. Available at: http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0128 Go to original source...
  12. International Monetary Fund (2012). World Economic Outlook: Growth Resuming, Dangers Remain. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
  13. Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. 2002 Ed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  14. Klinger, T., Teplý, P. (2014). Systemic Risk of the Global Banking System - An Agent-Based Network Model Approach. Prague Economic Papers, 23(1), 24-41, http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.471 Go to original source...
  15. Mundlak, Y. (1978). Pooling of Time-Series and Cross-Section Data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69-85, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1913646 Go to original source...
  16. Roengpitya, R., Tarashev, N., Tsatsaronis, K. (2014). Bank Business Models. BIS Quarterly Review, 55-65. Available at: http://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt1412g.htm
  17. Schunck, R. (2013). Within and Between Estimates in Random-Effects Models: Advantages and Drawbacks of Correlated Random Effects and Hybrid Models. The Stata Journal, 13(1), 65-76. Available at: http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0283 Go to original source...
  18. Sen, A. (2000). On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  19. Smith, A. (1759). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. 2000 Ed. New York: Prometheus Books. Go to original source...
  20. Smith, A. (1776). An Iquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. 2000 Ed. London: Electric Book Co. Go to original source...
  21. SFRE Fund, (2015). New Fund with Ambition to Provide $1 Billion Capital for New Banking Paradigm. Luxembourg: SFRE Fund. Available at: http://sfre.bluinc.co.uk/new-fund-with-ambition-to-provide-1-billion-capital-fornew-banking-paradigm/
  22. ©útorová, B., Teplý, P. (2014). The Level of Capital and the Value of EU Banks under Basel III. Prague Economic Papers, 23(2), 143-161, http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.477 Go to original source...
  23. The United States Department of Justice (2015). BNP Paribas Sentenced for Conspiring to Violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Trading with the Enemy Act. Washington D.C.: The United States Department of Justice. Available at: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/bnp-paribas-sentenced-conspiring-violate-international-emergency-economic-powers-act-and
  24. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Correlated Random Effects Models with Unbalanced Panels, World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Geneva: WBCSD. Available at: http://www.wbcsd.org/

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.