Prague Economic Papers 2017, 26(4):397-421 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.619

Conceptualization of Historical Time in Post Keynesian Economics

Zdeněk Chytil1, Lukáš Máslo2
1 Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Economics in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic (chytil@vse.cz)
2 Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Economics in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic (xmasl14@vse.cz)

The paper deals with a problem of conceptualization of historical time in Post Keynesian models. The authors introduce a new notion that they call hysteretic persistence, which they see as essential because such a phenomenon as path-dependence in the short-run equilibrium cannot be described by the existing of notions of hysteresis and persistence. In the field of system (ir)reversibility, drawing upon their previous research (Chytil, Máslo, 2014, 2015), the authors introduce a new notion of general reversibility, which they justify on the account that such phenomena as a shock - counter-shock sequence in both hysteretic-persistent and hysteretic systems cannot be described by either of Setterfield's (2008) notions of super-reversibility and irreversibility. Questioning Setterfield's (1998b, 1995) only too general dichotomy of lower/higher level of historical time, the authors rather suggest a characterization of historical time based on 6 attributes of "high-level" historical time based on the criteria of path-(in)dependence of equilibrium and (ir)reversibility. The suggested attributes underlie the authors' conceptualization scale which enables an assessment of a degree of "historicity" of any system. Finally, a practical application of the concept of hysteretic persistence is demonstrated on a case of Lavoie's PKA model (Lavoie, 2006) affected by a transitory demand shock. Setting the hysteretic persistence of Lavoie's PKA model into the conceptualization scale, the authors draw conclusions for a degree of "historicity" of this system.

Keywords: historical time, logical time, irreversibility, path-dependence, hysteresis, persistence, New Consensus
JEL classification: B4, B5, C6, E12, E5

Published: August 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chytil, Z., & Máslo, L. (2017). Conceptualization of Historical Time in Post Keynesian Economics. Prague Economic Papers, 26(4), 397-421. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.619
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Amable, B., Henry, J., Lordon, F., Topol, R. (1993). Unit-Root In the Wage-Price Spiral Is Not Hysteresis In Unemployment. Journal of Economic Studies, 20(1/2), 123-135, https://doi.org/10.1108/01443589310038551 Go to original source...
    2. Amable, B., Henry, J., Lordon, F., Topol, R. (1994). Strong Hysteresis versus Zero-Root Dynamics. Economic Letters, 44(1-2), 43-47, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(93)00300-d Go to original source...
    3. Franz, W. (1990). Hysteresis in Economic Relationships: An Overview. Empirical Economics, 15(2), 109-125, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01973448 Go to original source...
    4. Hayek, F. A. (1955). Degrees of Explanation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 6(23), 209-225, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/vi.23.209 Go to original source...
    5. Chick, V. (2004). On Open Systems. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 24(1), 3-16. Go to original source...
    6. Chytil, Z., Máslo, L. (2014). (Ir)reversibility of Hysteretic Systems in Post-Keynesian Economics. International Journal of Social Sciences, III(4), 153-172. Available at: http://www.iises.net/-ir-reversibility-of-hysteretic-systems-in-post-keynesian-ec.html
    7. Chytil, Z., Máslo, L. (2015). Hysteresis in Post-Keynesian Monetary Theory. European Scientific Journal, 11(7), 1-17. Available at: http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/5301/5110
    8. Jespersen, J. (2009). Macroeconomic Methodology. A Post-Keynesian Perspective. Edward Elgar. ISBN 978 1 84542 736 8. Go to original source...
    9. Kaldor, N. (1934). A Classificatory Note on the Determinateness of Equilibrium. The Review of Economic Studies, 1(2), 122-135, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967618 Go to original source...
    10. Kaldor, N. (1972). The Irrelevance of Equilibrium in Economics. The Economic Journal, 82, 1237-1255, https://doi.org/10.2307/2231304 Go to original source...
    11. Katzner, D. (1993). Some Notes on the Role of History and the Definition of Hysteresis and Related Concepts In Economic Analysis. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 15(3), 323-345, https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1993.11489947 Go to original source...
    12. Katzner, D. (1999). Hysteresis and the Modeling of Economic Phenomena. Review of Political Economy, 11(2), 171-181, https://doi.org/10.1080/095382599107101 Go to original source...
    13. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Volume VII. Royal Economic Society, Cambridge University Press, 1978. ISBN: 0 333 10729 2.
    14. Kriesler, P., Lavoie, M. (2007). The New Consensus on Monetary Policy and Its Post-Keynesian Critique. Review of Political Economy, 19(3), 387-404, https://doi.org/10.1080/09538250701453097 Go to original source...
    15. Lavoie, M. (2006). A Post-Keynesian Amendment to the New Consensus on Monetary Policy. Metroeconomica, 57(2), 165-192, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999x.2006.00238.x Go to original source...
    16. Lavoie, M. (2008). Towards Taming the New Consensus: Hystereris and Some Other Post-Keynesian Amendments. ROBINSON Working Paper No. 08-08. Go to original source...
    17. Máslo, L. (2016). Determinismus, Path-dependence a Nejistota Pohledem Postkeynesovske Ekonomie. (Determinism, Path-dependence and Uncertainty: A Post Keynesian Perspective) Dissertation Thesis, University of Economics, Prague. Available at: http://www.vse.cz/vskp/49149_determinismus_path_dependence_a%C2%A0nejistota_pohledem_postkeynesovske_ekonomie
    18. Máslo, L., Chytil, Z. (2015). Uncertainty, Money and Underemployment. European Scientific Journal, August 2015(Special Edition), 206-224. Available at: http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/6153/5937
    19. Setterfield, M. (1995). Historical Time and Economic Theory. Review of Political Economy, 7(1), 1-27, https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259500000001 Go to original source...
    20. Setterfield, M. (1996). Hysteresis and Uncertainty: Complementary or Competing Visions of Evolving Economic Systems, in Kosters, S., ed., Interactions in Political Economy: Malvern After Ten Years, London: Routledge, pp. 133-148. ISBN 0-415-13393-9.
    21. Setterfield, M. (1997). Should Economists Dispense with The Notion of Equilibrium? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 20(1), 47-76, https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1997.11490138 Go to original source...
    22. Setterfield, M. (1998a). Adjustment Asymmetries and Hysteresis in Simple Dynamic Models. The Manchester School, 66(3), 283-301, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9957.00102 Go to original source...
    23. Setterfield, M. (1998b). History versus Equilibrium: Nicholas Kaldor on Historical Time and Economic Theory, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(5), 521-537, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/22.5.521 Go to original source...
    24. Setterfield, M. (2008). Path Dependency, Hysteresis and Macroeconomics. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.150.1785&rep=rep1&type=pdf

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content