Prague Economic Papers 2017, 26(5):505-522 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.624

The Metropolisation Processes A Case of Central Europe and the Czech Republic

Milan Viturka1, Vilém Pařil2, Petr Tonev3, Petr Šašinka4, Josef Kunc5
1 Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (viturka@econ.muni.cz)
2 Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (vilem@mail.muni.cz)
3 Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (tonev@econ.muni.cz)
4 Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (206708@mail.muni.cz)
5 Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (kunc@econ.muni.cz)

The article deals with the strategically important problems of metropolisation. In this context, it presents a theoretically based method of assessment of metropolises, the explanatory power of which was verified on the example of the Central Europe. This method is based on three components: population size (initial assumption), economic profile (ties to economic performance) and general attractiveness (the perception of development potential). The results of the evaluation of the 27 identified metropolises were generalized using a typology of their inclusion within the framework of the listed components: most metropolises were classified as type B - an established metropolis, followed by type C - an elementary metropolis, and type A - a dominant metropolis. A practically targeted conceptualization is then demonstrated on the example of the Czech Republic. The main attention was focused on the intensity of the economic links of Prague (and two further Czech centres) with other Central European metropolises.

Keywords: metropolitan area, population size, economic profile, attractiveness, integration
JEL classification: O18, R11, R12, R58

Published: October 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Viturka, M., Pařil, V., Tonev, P., Šašinka, P., & Kunc, J. (2017). The Metropolisation Processes A Case of Central Europe and the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers26(5), 505-522. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.624
Download citation

References

  1. Abrantes, P., Bação, F., Lobio, V., Tenedório, J. (2005). Spatial Modelling of Metropolisation in Portugal. 14th European Colloquium on Theoretical and Quantitative Geography. Tamar, Portugal, 1-18. Available at: http://www.novaims.unl.pt/labnt/geosom/Public/o4-Spatial%20modelling%20.pdf
  2. Annoni, P., Dijkstra, L. (2013). EU Regional Competitiveness Index. Joint Research Centre, Scientific and Policy Report, European Commission, https://doi.org/10.2788/61698 Go to original source...
  3. Bańczyk, M. (2012). From Connectivity to Metropolis Power: Measuring National City Networks with METROX Methodology - The Case Of Poland. Globalization and World Cities Research Bulletin, 341. Available at: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rb341.html
  4. Brezzi, M., Piacentini, M., Rosina, K, Sanchez-Serra, D. (2012). Redefining Urban Areas in OECD Countries. Redefining Urban: A New Way to Measure Metropolitan Areas. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 19-58, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264174108-en Go to original source...
  5. Bourdeau-Lepage, L. (2004). Metropolization in Central & Eastern European: Unequal Chance. Globalization and World Cities Research Bulletin, 141(A). Available at: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rb141.html
  6. Brender, N., Golden, A. (2007). Mission Impossible: Successful Canadian Cities. Paper presented at The Conference Board of Canada III. Ottawa, Canada.
  7. Cushman & Wakefield (2011). European Cities Monitor. New York: Cushman & Wakefield.
  8. Duranton G. (1999). Distance, Land, and Proximity: Economic Analysis and the Evolution of Cities. Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analyses, 31(12), 2169-2188, https://doi.org/10.1068/a312169 Go to original source...
  9. European Commission (2011). Cities of Tomorrow - Challenges, Visions, Ways Forward. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union, https://doi.org/10.2776/41803 Go to original source...
  10. European Environment Agency (2006). Urban Sprawl in Europe: The Ignored Challenge. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/690872 Go to original source...
  11. Frantál, B., Greer-Wotten, B., Klusáček, P., Kunc, J., Martinát, S. (2015). Exploring Spatial Patterns of Urban Brownfields Regeneration: The Case of Brno, Czech Republic. Cities, 44, 9-18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.12.007 Go to original source...
  12. Friedman, J., Wulff, R. (1976). Urban Transition: Comparative Studies of New Industrializing Societies. London: Hodder & Stoughton Educational, https://doi.org/10.1177/009614428000600301 Go to original source...
  13. GaWC (2014). Globalization and World Cities. Loughborough: Loughborough University, Study Group and Network, https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12109 Go to original source...
  14. Growe, A. (2012). Emerging Polycentric City-Regions in Germany. Regionalisation of Economic Activities in Metropolitan Regions. Erdkunde, 66(4), 295-311, https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2012.04.02 Go to original source...
  15. Hampl, M. (1996). Geografická organizace společnosti a transformační procesy v České republice (Geographical Organization of Society and Transformation Processes in the Czech Republic). Prague: Charles University.
  16. Hanssens, H., Derudder, B., Witlox, F. (2012). Managing Organizational and Geographical Complexity: The Positionality of Advanced Producer Services in the Globalizing Economies of Metropolitan Regions. Erdkunde, 66(1), 45-55, https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2012.01.04 Go to original source...
  17. Ianoş, I., Peptenatu, D., Drăghcii, C., Pintilii, R., D. (2012). Management Elements of the Emergent Metropolitan Areas in a Transition Country. Romania as a Case Study. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 4(2), 149-171, https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764030104002 Go to original source...
  18. Innovation Cities (2015). 2thinkknow Innovation Cities. Melbourne: 2THINKNOW
  19. Knox, P. L., Taylor, P. J. (Eds.). (1995). World Cities in a World-System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  20. Kraft, S., Halás, M., Vančura, M. (2014). The Delimitation of Urban Hinterlands Based on Transport Flows: A Case Study of Regional Capitals in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 22(1), 24-32, https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2014-0003 Go to original source...
  21. Krätke, S. (2006). The Metropolization of the European Urban and Regional System. Globalization and World Cities Research Bulletin, 193, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310601016424 Go to original source...
  22. McCann, P. (2010). Urban and Regional Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Mercer (2012). Quality of Living Worldwide City Rankings Survey. Warsaw: Marsh & McLennan Companies, Mercer.
  24. MMR, ÚÚR (2015). Politika územního rozvoje České republiky ve znění aktualizace č. 1. (Spatial Development Policy of the Czech Republic in the Wording of the Update No. 1). Prague: Ministry of Regional Development.
  25. Neumann, U. (2013). City Ranking - A Useful Instrument for Regional Analysis and Policy? Paper presented at the Acatech CAE Workshop "A Ranking Scheme for Intelligent Cities", Munich, Deutsche akademie der Technikwissenschaften.
  26. OECD (2006). Competitive Cities in the Global Economy. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Territorial Reviews, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264027091-en Go to original source...
  27. OECD (2015). Metropolitan Areas. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Statistics.
  28. Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  29. Statutory city of Brno (2015). Atlas brněnské metropolitní oblasti. (Atlas of Brno Metropolitan Area). Available at: https://www.brno.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/sprava_mesta/Strategie-pro_Brno/dokumenty/iti/final_Atlas-BMO-complet-preview.pdf
  30. Steinführer, A., Bierzyński, A., Großmann, K, Haase, A., Kabisch, S., Klusáček. P. (2010). Population Decline in Polish and Czech Cities during Post-socialism? Looking Behind the Official Statistics. Urban Studies, 47(11), 2325-2346. Go to original source...
  31. The Federal Statistical Office (2012). Vorläufige Ergebnisse (Preliminary results). Wiesbaden: Das Statistische Bundesamt.
  32. Viturka, M., Halámek, P., Klímová, V., Tonev, P., Žítek, V. (2010). Kvalita podnikatelského prostředí, regionální konkurenceschopnost a strategie regionálního rozvoje České republiky. (The Quality of the Business Environment, Regional Competitiveness and Regional Development Strategy of the Czech Republic). Prague: Grada.
  33. Viturka, M. (2014). Integrative Model for Evaluation of Development Potentials of Regions and Its Application on an Example of the Czech Republic. Economics and management, 17(4), 4-19, https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2014-4-001 Go to original source...
  34. Viturka, M. (2015). Monocentrický scénář perspektivního uspořádání moravského prostoru - realistická či fiktivní představa (Monocentric Scenario of Perspective Arrangement of Moravian Space - Realistic or Fictious Idea?). XVIII. International Colloquium on Regional Sciences, 217-222, ttps://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-7861-2015-29 Go to original source...
  35. Ženka, J., Čadil, V. (2009). Regional Distribution of Technology-Intensive Manufacturing Industries in the Czech Republic with an Accent on Risk of Delocalisation. Prague Economic Papers, 19(1), 61-77, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.342 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.