Prague Economic Papers 2017, 26(4):377-396 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.627

Personal Loan Companies in Poland: Does Empirical Evidence Justify Regulatory Transition?

Andrzej Cwynar1, Wiktor Cwynar2, Kamil Wais3, Radoslaw Parda4
1 University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin, Poland (cwynary@gmail.com); Wiktor Cwynar, University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin, Poland (wiktor.cwynar@gmail.com)
2 University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin, Poland (wiktor.cwynar@gmail.com)
3 University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Poland (kamil.wais@gmail.com)
4 Leadership Consulting, Poland (radekparda@gmail.com)

We surveyed representative sample of 1,004 adult Poles to check the extent to which they distinguish among the entities operating in the market for personal loans in Poland, how they perceive loans and lending entities, and what is their knowledge on lending/borrowing issues. Particularly, we were interested in getting the insight into the fragment of the market that is operated by personal loan companies, with special emphasis on the profile of the average (statistical) borrower. Our examination was motivated by the controversies surrounding the law amendment started in Poland in 2015 in order to regulate the fraction of the consumer credit market represented by personal loan companies. By utilizing logistic and multivariate linear regression models with variables obtained from our survey, we tested whether the legal reform was well-informed and well-addressed. We found that Polish households have serious problems with distinguishing various entities that provide loans to private individuals and that such problems manifest even greater problem of material shortcomings in Poles' debt literacy. We also evidenced low public trust to lending entities, particularly to loan companies. In the light of the findings the law amendment is well-grounded, however it should be supported by actions aimed at enhancing households' financial literacy.

Keywords: personal loan companies, market for personal loans, lending regulations, public trust in lending entities, debt literacy
JEL classification: G21, G23

Published: August 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cwynar, A., Cwynar, W., Wais, K., & Parda, R. (2017). Personal Loan Companies in Poland: Does Empirical Evidence Justify Regulatory Transition? Prague Economic Papers, 26(4), 377-396. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.627
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Atkinson, A., Messy, F. (2012). Measuring Financial Literacy: Results of the OECD / International Network on Financial Education (INFE) Pilot Study. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance, and Private Pensions No. 15. OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9csfs90fr4-en Go to original source...
    2. Bialowolski, P. (2012). Rynek firm pozyczkowych w Polsce. Charakterystyka sektora i profil klienta. (The Market of Personal Loan Companies in Poland. Sector Characteristics and Profile of the Client). Warsaw: Konfederacja Przedsiębiorstw Finansowych w Polsce. Retrieved from: http://www.senat.gov.pl/gfx/senat/userfiles/_public/k8/komisje/2012/kbfp/materialy/47pospozy.pdf
    3. Central Statistical Office (2014). Monitoring of Banks. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office.
    4. Ciesla, S. (2014). Charakterystyka polskiego rynku pozyczek pozabankowych w kontekscie propozycji niektorych zmian ustawowych. (The Characteristics of Polish Market for Non-Banking Loans in the Context of Some Statutory Amendments Proposition). Retrieved from: https://legislacja.rcl.gov.pl/docs//2/262790/262809/dokument148103.pdf
    5. Credit Information Bureau & The Kronenberg Foundation (2014). Wiedza o produktach kredytowych i wiarygodnosci finansowej w percepcji Polakow. (The Knowledge on Credit Facilities and Credit Worthiness as Perceived by Poles).Warsaw: the Credit Information Bureau and the Kronenberg Foundation.
    6. Czapinski, J., Panek, T. (2015). Diagnoza spoleczna 2015. Warunki i jakosc zycia Polakow (Social Diagnosis 2015. Poles' Conditions and Quality of Living.).Warsaw: Rada Monitoringu Społecznego.
    7. Deutsche Bank (2013). Raport: Portret finansowy Polki 2013. (Report: Financial Portrait of Polish Woman).Warsaw: Deutsche Bank.
    8. Disney, R., Gathergood, J. (2011). Financial Literacy and Indebtedness: New Evidence for U.K. Consumers. University of Nottingham. Centre for Finance, Credit and Macroeconomics. Working Paper No. 11/05, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1851343 Go to original source...
    9. Fundacja Republikanska (2013). Problematyka regulacji rynku firm pożyczkowych w Polsce. (The Issue of Regulation on the Market for Personal Loans in Poland).Warsaw: 2013.
    10. ING (2013). Finansowy Barometr ING: Miedzynarodowe badanie ING na temat postaw konsumentow wobec finansow, mediow społecznosciowych oraz bankowosci mobilnej w Polsce i na swiecie. (ING Financial Barometer: International Study of Consumers' Attitudes to Finance Issues, Social Media and Mobile Banking in Poland and Worldwide). Retrieved from: http://media.ingbank.pl/pr/246004/media-spolecznosciowe-istotne-przy-podejmowaniu-decyzji-finansowych-wynika-z-miedzynarodowego-badania-ing
    11. Instytut Wolnosci & Raiffeisen Polbank (2014). Stan wiedzy ekonomicznej Polakow. (Economic Literacy of Poles).Warsaw: Instytut Wolnosci & Raiffeisen Polbank.
    12. Kaczmarski, P. (2015). Rynek w swietle planowanej nowelizacji Ustawy o nadzorze nad rynkiem finansowym (Financial Market in the Light of Planned Regulation Act). Gazeta Finansowa. No. 31/32, 18.
    13. Lusardi, A., Tufano, P. (2009). Debt Literacy, Financial Experiences, and Overindebtedness. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 14808, https://doi.org/10.3386/w14808 Go to original source...
    14. Luczak, K. (2015). Rynek pozyczkowy dojrzal do regulacji (Personal Lending Market Matured for Regulation). Gazeta Finansowa. No. 31/32, 19.
    15. National Bank of Poland (2012). Komunikat Komitetu Stabilnosci Finansowej. Ustalenia KSF i rekomendowane dzialania w odniesieniu do instytucji parabankowych. (Financial Stability Committee's Statement. Arrangements and Recommended Actions in Relation to Parabanks). Retrieved from: http://www.nbp.pl/home.aspx?f=/aktualnosci/wiadomosci_2012/20120816_kom.html
    16. National Bank of Poland (2015). Sytuacja finansowa sektora gospodarstw domowych w IV kw. 2014 r. (Financial Situation of Households in Fourth Quarter of 2014).Warsaw: National Bank of Poland.
    17. PwC (2013). Personal Loans Market in Poland. Warsaw: PwC.
    18. Szelagowska, A. (2015). Rynek pozyczek pozabankowych w Polsce w swietle polityki niskich stop procentowych banku centralnego. (Polish Market for Non-Banking Loans in the Light of low Interest Rates Policy of Central Bank). Kwartalnik Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Spolecznego. Studia i Prace, 1(3), 119-136. Go to original source...
    19. The Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (2012). Konsument na rynku uslug finansowych. (Consumer on the Market for Financial Services).Retrieved from: https://uokik.gov.pl/download.php?plik=12138
    20. The World Bank (2014). Financial Inclusion. Washington: The World Bank.
    21. Zwiazek Firm Pozyczkowych (2013). Mikropozyczki w Polsce. (Microloans in Poland).Warsaw: Zwiazek Firm Pozyczkowych.
    22. Zwiazek Przedsiebiorcow i Pracodawcow (2015). Walka o polski rynek pozyczkowy w swietle nowelizacji Ustawy o kredycie konsumenckim. (The Struggle for Polish Lending Market in the Light of Consumer Credit Act Amendment).Warsaw: Zwi±zek Przedsiebiorcow i Pracodawcow.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content