Prague Economic Papers 2018, 27(1):40-54 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.637

Income, Charitable Giving, and Perception Bias

Kun Su1, Rui Wan2
1 School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University (sukun@nwpu.edu.cn)
2 Rui Wan, School of Economics, Nanjing University (wanrui@nju.edu.cn)

This paper analyses income and charitable giving from the perspective of perception bias. We show that perception bias affects charitable giving through its effects on warm glow, while inequality aversion counteracts these effects. Donors' perception bias regarding a recipient's situation does not necessarily decrease their charitable giving. Specifically, perception bias regarding the recipients' effort and life shock decreases donors' charitable giving. Perception bias regarding the recipients' ability decreases donors' giving to charities designed to help low-ability recipients but increases their giving to charities designed to help high-ability recipients. We also show that perception bias increases with donors' income. Fundraising professionals shall allocate more efforts to those who do not care about inequality that much when correcting the donors' perception bias; focus their efforts on correcting the donors' perception bias, especially for rich donors, when raising money for charities with low-ability recipients; but increase donors' perception bias regarding the recipients' ability when raising money for charities with high-ability recipients.

Keywords: charitable giving, inequality aversion, perception bias, warm glow
JEL classification: D63, D64

Published: February 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Su, K., & Wan, R. (2018). Income, Charitable Giving, and Perception Bias. Prague Economic Papers27(1), 40-54. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.637
Download citation

References

  1. Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence. The Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447-1458, https://doi.org/10.1086/261662 Go to original source...
  2. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-glow Giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464-477, https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133 Go to original source...
  3. Andreoni, J. (1995). Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion. American Economic Review, 85(4), 891-904.
  4. Andreoni, J. (2006). Philanthropy, in Kolm, S.C. and J.M. Ythier, ed., Volume 2 of Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism. Elsevier, 1201-1269. Go to original source...
  5. Andreoni, J., Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which Is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 293-312, https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556419 Go to original source...
  6. Auten, G. E., Sieg, H., Clotfelter, C. T. (2002). Charitable Giving, Income, and Taxes: An Analysis of Panel Data. American Economic Review, 92(1), 371-382, https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015793 Go to original source...
  7. Bashir, N., Dayson, C., Eadson, W., Wells, P. (2013). A Warm Glow in All Parts? Building Local Cause-Affinity as a Strategy for Promoting Charitable Giving. People, Place & Policy Online, 7(3), 139-152, https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0007.0003.0003 Go to original source...
  8. Becker, G. S. (1974). A Theory of Social Interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063-1093, https://doi.org/10.1086/260265 Go to original source...
  9. Bekkers, R., Wiepking, P. (2007). Generosity and Philanthropy: A Literature Review.
  10. SSRN Working Paper No. 1015507, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1015507 Go to original source...
  11. Bekkers, R. H. (2004). Giving and Volunteering in the Netherlands: Sociological and Psycho- logical Perspectives. Utrecht University.
  12. Bennett, R. (2012). Why Urban Poor Donate: A Study of Low-Income Charitable Giving in London. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 870-891, https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011419518 Go to original source...
  13. Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition. American Economic Review, 26(1), 51-74. Go to original source...
  14. Buckley, E., Croson, R. (2006). Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Voluntary Provision of Linear Public Goods. Journal of Public Economics, 90(4), 935-955, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.06.002 Go to original source...
  15. Carroll, J., McCarthy, S., Newman, C. (2005). An Econometric Analysis of Charitable Donations in the Republic of Ireland. Economic and Social Review, 36(3), 229-249.
  16. Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., Tetaz, M. (2013). Biased Perceptions of Income Distribution and Preferences for Redistribution: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98(3), 100-112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.009 Go to original source...
  17. Donoghue, F., Ruddle, H. (2000). Warm Glow in a Cool Climate? Philanthropy in Ireland. Paper presented to theInternational Society for Third Sector Research Fourth Biennial Conference Dublin.
  18. Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., Nikiforakis, N. (2011). Relative Earnings and Giving in a Real-Effort Experiment. The American Economic Review, 101(7), 3330-3348, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.7.3330 Go to original source...
  19. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868, https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151 Go to original source...
  20. James, R. N., Sharpe, D. L. (2007). The Nature and Causes of the U-Shaped Charitable Giving Profile. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 218-238, https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006295993 Go to original source...
  21. Mayo, J. W., Tinsley, C. H. (2009). Warm Glow and Charitable Giving: Why the Wealthy Do Not Give More to Charity? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 490-499, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.06.001 Go to original source...
  22. Miller, D. T., Ross, M. (1975). Self-Serving Biases in the Attribution of Causality: Fact or Fiction? Psychological Bul letin, 82(2), 213-225, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076486 Go to original source...
  23. Mullen, B., Riordan, C. A. (1988). Self-Serving Attributions for Performance in Naturalistic Settings: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(1), 3-22, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00001.x Go to original source...
  24. Ross, L. (1977). The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173-220, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60357-3 Go to original source...
  25. Tonin, M., Vlassopoulos, M. (2014). An Experimental Investigation of Intrinsic Motivations for Giving. Theory and Decision, 76(1), 47-67, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-013-9360-9 Go to original source...
  26. Vesterlund, L. (2006). Why Do People Give, in Powell, W. and R.S. Steinberg, ed., The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook 2. New Haven, CT: Yale University, pp. 168-190.
  27. Wiepking, P. (2007). The Philanthropic Poor: In Search of Explanations for the Relative Generosity of Lower Income Households. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(4), 339-358, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-007-9049-1 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.