Prague Economic Papers 2018, 27(1):55-72 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.643

Risk-Based Investing in the German Stock Market

Jan Bastin
Department of Banking and Insurance, University of Economics in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The article shows properties of risk-based portfolios in the German stock market. Those systematic strategies use different approaches to weight stocks in portfolios. We present theoretical and empirical characteristics of five risk-based equity investments: the equal-weighted, minimum variance, maximum diversification and risk parity (equal risk budgeting and equal risk contribution) portfolios. Risk-based portfolios outperformed the market-cap weighted CDAX index with a lower level of risk in the period 2002–2015. Their excess returns relative to the CDAX index can be explained with Scherer’s five-factor model; with Fama-French and low-risk anomaly factors. R2s of different strategies range from 77% to 92%.

Keywords: risk-based portfolio, German stock market, CDAX index, risk, returns, multifactor model
JEL classification: G10, G11

Published: February 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bastin, J. (2018). Risk-Based Investing in the German Stock Market. Prague Economic Papers27(1), 55-72. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.643
Download citation

References

  1. Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., Zhang, X. (2006). The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259-299. Go to original source...
  2. Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., Zhang, X. (2009). High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns: International and Further U.S. Evidence. The Journal of Financial Economics, 91(1), 1-23. Go to original source...
  3. Baker, M., Bradley, B., Wurgler, J. (2011). Benchmarks as Limits to Arbitrage: Understanding the Low-Volatility Anomaly. Financial Analysts Journal, 67(1), 40-54. Go to original source...
  4. Baker, N. L., Haugen, R. A. (2012). Low Risk Stocks Outperform within All Observable Markets of the World. Social Science Research Network. [online] Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2055431. [Accessed: 13 June 2013], https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2055431 Go to original source...
  5. Bastin, J. (2015). Minimum Variance Investing on the Prague Stock Exchange. 18th International Scientific Conference "Enterprise and the Competitive Environment". Brno: Mendel University, 2015, 46-55. [online] Available from: https://ece.pefka.mendelu.cz/sites/default/files/imce/ece_2015_final.pdf. [Accessed: 2 November 2015]
  6. Bastin, J. (2016). Minimum Variance Portfolios in the German Stock Market. Prague Economic Papers, [online] available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.599. Go to original source...
  7. Blitz, D. C., van Vliet, P. (2007). The Volatility Effect: Lower Risk without Lower Return. Journal of Portfolio Management, 34(1), 102-113. Go to original source...
  8. Carvalho, R., Lu, X., Moulin, P. (2012). Demystifying Equity Risk-Based Strategies. Journal of Portfolio Management, 38(3), 56-70, https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2012.38.3.056 Go to original source...
  9. Choueifaty, Y., Coignard, Y. (2008). Towards Maximum Diversification. Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(1), 40-51, https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2008.35.1.40 Go to original source...
  10. Clarke, R. G., De Silva, H., Thorley, S. (2006). Minimum Variance Portfolios in the U.S. Equity Market. Journal of Portfolio Management, 33(1), 10-24, https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2006.661366 Go to original source...
  11. Clarke, R. G., De Silva, H., Thorley, S. (2013). Risk Parity, Maximum Diversification, and Minimum Variance: An Analytic Perspective. Journal of Portfolio Management, 39(3), 39-53, https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2013.39.3.039 Go to original source...
  12. Davis, J. L., Fama, E. F., French, K. R. (2000). Characteristics, Covariances, and Average Returns: 1929 to 1997. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 389-406, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00209 Go to original source...
  13. DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., Uppal, R. (2007). Optimal versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(5), 1915-1953, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075 Go to original source...
  14. Fama, E. F., Mac Beth, J. D. (1973). Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607-636,https://doi.org/10.1086/260061 Go to original source...
  15. Haugen, R., Baker, N. (1991). The Efficient Market Inefficiency of Capitalization-Weighted Stock Portfolios. Journal of Portfolio Management, 17(3), 35-40, https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1991.409335 Go to original source...
  16. Maillard, S., Roncalli, T., Teiletche, J. (2010). The Properties of Equally Weighted Risk Contribution Portfolios. Journal of Portfolio Management, 36(4), 60-70, https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2010.36.4.060 Go to original source...
  17. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91, https://doi.org/10.2307/2975974 Go to original source...
  18. Scherer, B. (2010). A New Look at Minimum Variance Investing. Social Science Research Network. [online] Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1681306. [Accessed: 15 December 2014], https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1681306 Go to original source...
  19. Shmueli, G. (2010). To Explain or to Predict? Statistical Science, 25(3), 289-310. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.