Prague Economic Papers 2018, 27(1):73-91 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.644

Some Effects of Intellectual Property Protection on National Economies: Theoretical and Econometric Study

Tomáš Evan1, 2, Pavla Vozárová1, Ilya Bolotov3
1 Faculty of Information Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague
2 University of New York in Prague and Anglo-American University, Czech Republic
3 University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic

This paper aims to theoretically derive and afterwards econometrically assess the impact of intellectual property protection (IPP) on national economies. The authors’ main hypothesis is that by creating a form of non-market protection, IPP limits free competition and has no positive effects on national economies and the world economy in general. The hypothesis is tested through estimation of relationship between charges for the use of intellectual property and 1) gross domestic product, 2) GDP growth, 3) unemployment, 4) exports of high-tech products, 5) FDI outflow, and 6) expenses on research and development in a panel dataset of 146 countries in years 2005–2014 based Arellano-Bond estimator for dynamic panel models. The data tells us that changes in these charges have not a significant impact on the studied indicators, which counts against claims of positive impact of IPP on economies and growth.

Keywords: intellectual property, economic theory, dynamic panel
JEL classification: C22, C23, D40, O34, O40

Published: February 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Evan, T., Vozárová, P., & Bolotov, I. (2018). Some Effects of Intellectual Property Protection on National Economies: Theoretical and Econometric Study. Prague Economic Papers27(1), 73-91. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.644
Download citation

References

  1. Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297, https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968 Go to original source...
  2. Boldrin, M., Levine, D. (2008). Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge Books. Cambridge: University Press, Cambridge, England. ISBN: 9780521879286. Go to original source...
  3. Bolotov, I., Evan, T. (2014). The Weak Relation between Foreign Direct Investment and Corruption: A Theoretical and Econometric Study. Prague Economic Papers, 23(4), 474-492, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.494 Go to original source...
  4. Deardorff, A. V. (1992). Welfare Effects of Global Patent Protection. Economica, 59(233), 35-51, https://doi.org/10.2307/2555064 Go to original source...
  5. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1-31, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490372 Go to original source...
  6. Evan, T. (2010). Some Issues of Political Economics of Multinational Corporations. Acta Oeconomica Pragensis, 2010(4), 32-43. Go to original source...
  7. Falvey, R., Foster, N., Greenaway D. (2006). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth. Review of Development Economics, 10 (4), 700-719. Go to original source...
  8. Horii, R., Iwaisako, T. (2007). Economic Growth with Imperfect Protection of Intellectual Property Rights. Journal of Economics, 90(1), 45-85, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-006-0222-6 Go to original source...
  9. Iwaisako, T., Tanaka, H., Futagami, K. (2011). A Welfare Analysis of Global Patent Protection in a Model with Endogenous Innovation and Foreign Direct Investment. European Economic Review, 55(8), 1137-1151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2011.05.001 Go to original source...
  10. Kanwar, S., Evenson, R. (2003). Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change? Oxford Economic Papers, 55(2), 235-264, https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/55.2.235 Go to original source...
  11. Kydland, F. E, Prescott, E. C. (1982). Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations. Econometrica, 50(6), 1345-1370, https://doi.org/10.2307/1913386 Go to original source...
  12. Lee, J. Y., Mansfield, E. (1996). Intellectual Property Protection and U.S. Foreign Direct Investment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 181-186. Go to original source...
  13. Long, J. B., Plosser, C. I. (1983). Real Business Cycles. Journal of Political Economy, 91(1), 39-69, https://doi.org/10.1086/261128 Go to original source...
  14. Michel, P., Nyssen, J. (1998). On Knowledge Diffusion, Patents Lifetime and Innovation Based Endogenous Growth. Annalesd' Economieet de Statistique, ENSAE, 49/50, 77-103, https://doi.org/10.2307/20076111 Go to original source...
  15. MOFA (2011). Text of the ACTA treaty, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan.
  16. Okun, A. M. (1962). Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance. Reprinted as Cowles Foundation Paper 190.
  17. Pakes, A., Griliches, Z. (1984). Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look, in Griliches Z., ed. (1984). R & D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and NBER. Go to original source...
  18. Samuelson, P. A. (1948). Economics: An Introductory Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill. 622 p.
  19. Samuelson, P. A., Nordhaus, W. (2009). Economics. 19. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 744 p. ISBN 978-0073511290.
  20. Sattar, A., Mahmood, T. (2011). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth: Evidences from High, Middle and Low Income Countries. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 49(2), 163-186.
  21. Sollow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94, https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513 Go to original source...
  22. Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation. The Economic Record, 32(2), 334-361, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1956.tb00434.x Go to original source...
  23. Thompson, M.A., Rushing, F. W. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Patent Protection on Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Development, 21(2), 61-77.
  24. WIPO (2013). Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. World Intellectual Property Organization.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.