Prague Economic Papers 2019, 28(3):348-362 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.698

Optimizing the Structure of the European UnionBudget Expenditure

Andrii Boiar
Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, Ukraine

The article discusses which policies and to what extent should be financed from the EU budget and/or from the national budgets of the EU member states to satisfy the rationale and efficiency point of view. To answer these questions we discuss the existing approaches and apply the most relevant ones (in particular the theory of fiscal federalism and public sector economics) to examine the current structure of the EU budget expenditures. We conclude that there are few EU policies that would be more efficient if they were more fiscally centralized and there is a policy that should be brought down to national (regional) level.

Keywords: budget, international union, budget expenditures, optimal, structure, member state, EU
JEL classification: F36, F55, G28

Received: September 5, 2017; Accepted: April 30, 2018; Published: July 10, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Boiar, A. (2019). Optimizing the Structure of the European UnionBudget Expenditure. Prague Economic Papers28(3), 348-362. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.698
Download citation

References

  1. Alesina, A., Ignazio, A., Federico, E. (2005). International Unions. The American Economic Review, 95(3), 602-615, https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054201279 Go to original source...
  2. Begg, I. (2000). Reshaping the EU Budget: Yet Another Missed Opportunity? European Urban and Regional Studies, 7(1), 51-62, https://doi.org/10.1177/096977640000700104 Go to original source...
  3. Begg, I. (2016). The EU Budget and UK Contribution. National Institute Economic Review, 236(1), 39-47, https://doi.org/10.1177/002795011623600106 Go to original source...
  4. Boiar, A. O. (2014). Revenue-Generating Schemes for International Unions. Journal of Economic Integration, 29(3), 407-429, https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2014.29.3.407 Go to original source...
  5. Boiar, A. O. (2014). Transformation of the EU Budgetary Model under Global Financial Turbulence. Lutsk: Vezha-Druk. ISBN 978-617-7181-64-3.
  6. Boiar, A. O., Shmatkovska, T. O., Stashchuk O. V. (2018). Towards the Theory of Supranational Finance. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1482594 Go to original source...
  7. Buchanan, J. M., Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. ISBN 10:0472061003.
  8. Buti, M., Nava, M. (2003). Towards a European Budgetary System. European University Institute. Florence Working Paper No 2003/08.
  9. Carruba, C. J. (1997). Net Financial Transfers in the EU: Who Gets What and Why? Journal of Politics, 59(2), 469-496, https://doi.org/10.2307/2998173 Go to original source...
  10. Citi, M. (2015). EU Budget Politics: Explaining Stability and Change in Spending Allocations. European Union Politics, 16(2), 260-280, https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515569551 Go to original source...
  11. Connolly, S., Munro, A. (1999). Economics of the Public Sector. Essex (England): Pearson Education Limited. ISBN 978-0130966414.
  12. Danell, T. (2008). The EU Long-Term Budget: Reform and New Priorities. Östersund: ITPS, Swedish Institute For Growth Policy Studies.
  13. Danell, T., Östhol, A. (2008). The EU Long-Term Budget: Reform and New Priorities. Report to the Swedish Ministry of Finance. ITPS, Swedish Institute For Growth Policy Studies. Östersund.
  14. Ederveen, S., Gelauf, G., Pelkmans, J. (2006). Assessing Subsidiarity. CPB Document, No 133. ISBN 90-5833-299-3.
  15. European Commission (2018). A New, Modern Multiannual Financial Framework for a European Union that Delivers Efficiency on its Priorities Post-2020. COM(2018) 98 final.
  16. European Commission (2008). Internal Charter for the Evaluation Function in DG ECFIN. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/pages/publication13113_en.pdf
  17. European Commission (2017). Multiannual Financial Framework Adjusted for 2018. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/budget/mff/figures/index_en.cfm
  18. Figueira, F. (2008a). A Better Budget for Europe: Economically Efficient, Politically Realistic. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies (European Policy Analysis), April, Issue 2-2008.
  19. Figueira, F. (2008b). How to Reform the EU Budget? A Multidisciplinary Approach. Utrecht School of Economics. Discussion Paper Series No 7.Groot, L., Zonneveld, E. (2013). EU Budget Contributions and Expenditures: A Lorenz Curve Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(4), 649-666, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12013 Go to original source...
  20. Institute for Economic Research (2008). A Study on EU Spending. Final Report. ECORYS Nederland BV, Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB). Rotterdam.
  21. Majocchi, A. (2008). Theories of Fiscal Federalism and the European Experience. Società italiana di economia pubblica. Working Paper No. 608.
  22. Mattila, M. (2006). Fiscal Transfers and Redistribution in the EU: Do Smaller Member States Get More than Their Share? Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), 34-51, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500380726 Go to original source...
  23. Mundell, R. A. (1961). A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. American Economic Review, 51(4), 657-665.
  24. Musgrave, R. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance: a Study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw Hill. ASIN: B0006AVID2.
  25. Musgrave, R. A. (1969). Theories of Fiscal Federalism. Public Finance, 24(4), 521-532.
  26. Nicolaides, Ph., Talsma, F. (2005). Financing the EU: Options for Reform. EIPAScope, 2, 27-34.
  27. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace & Jovanovich. ISBN 978-0155274525.
  28. Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4), 349-373, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9 Go to original source...
  29. Persson, T., Roland, G., Tabellini, G. (1996). The Theory of Fiscal Federalism: What Does It Mean for Europe? IGIER. Working Paper No. 101.
  30. Schratzenstaller, M. (2017). The Brexit as Opportunity for a Sustainability-Oriented Reform of the EU Budget. ÖGfE Policy Brief 09a'2017. ISSN 2305-2635.
  31. Stiglitz, J. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector. New York: W. W. Norton & Co. ISBN 978-0393966510.
  32. Tabellini, G. (2003). Principles of Policymaking in the EU: an Economic Perspective. CES Ifo Economic Studies, 49(1), 75-102, https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/49.1.75 Go to original source...
  33. Ter-Minassian, T. et al. (1997). Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice. Teresa Ter-Minassian, Editor. Washington: International Monetary Fund. ISBN 1-55775-663-5.
  34. Tiebout, C. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424, https://doi.org/10.1086/257839 Go to original source...
  35. Tinbergen, J. (1952). On the Theory of Economic Policy. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co. ISBN 978-0-7204-3130-8.
  36. Wildavsky, A. (1961). Political Implications of Budgetary Reform. Public Administration Review, 21(4), 183-190, https://doi.org/10.2307/973628 Go to original source...
  37. Zaporozhets, V., García-Valiñas, M., Kurz, S. (2016). Key Drivers of EU Budget Allocation: Does Power Matter? European Journal of Political Economy, 43(C), 57-70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.02.004 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.