Prague Economic Papers 2019, 28(4):416-432 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.701

Subsidies to Less Favoured Areas in the Czech Republic: Why Do They Matter?

Jana Poláková
Jana Poláková, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

Subsidy to less favoured area (LFA) farms is central to rural development policy in the European Union. Here, three categories of LFA support are assessed: farm competitiveness measures, LFA measures, and agri-environment measures. These categories of measures are complementary to safeguarding land management and delivering ecosystem benefits. Based on historical data for the Czech Republic, this paper endeavours to illustrate potential methods for assessing the LFA subsidies. In sum, rigorous methods to evaluate LFA evidence are still at their very starting point, even as they are necessary in order to ascertain the Community's capability, alongside the local, regional, or national institutional capability. A positive trend has been identified with regard to  stabilizing the available rural development budget for the policy priority "Restoring, preserving and enhancing agroecosystems".

Keywords: LFA support, rural development funding, land-based measures
JEL classification: H41, N50, Q10, R1

Received: October 20, 2017; Accepted: April 30, 2018; Published: September 3, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Poláková, J. (2019). Subsidies to Less Favoured Areas in the Czech Republic: Why Do They Matter? Prague Economic Papers28(4), 416-432. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.701
Download citation

References

  1. Anon (2007). Rural Development Programme 2007-2013. Available at: http://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/dotace/program-rozvoje-venkova-na-obdobi-2007/programove-dokumenty/program-rozvoje-venkova-cr-puvodni.html
  2. Barnes, A., Schwarz, G., Keenleyside, C., Thomson, S., Waterhouse, T., Polakova, J., Stewart, S., McCracken, D. (2011). Alternative Payment Approaches for Non-Economic Farming Systems Delivering Environmental Public Goods. Scottish Agricultural College, Institute for European Environmental Policy, Thünen Institute for Farm Economics.
  3. Cao Y., Elliott, J., Jones, G., Simpson, D., Boatman, N., Laybourn, R., Northing, P., Ramwell, C., Turley, D., van Driel, K., Condlifee, I., Dennis, E., Dwyer, J., Mills, J. (2009). Evaluation of Cross Compliance. Report to Department of Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs (Defra), ADAS; Central Science Laboratory; University of Gloucestershire.
  4. Cardwell, M. (2004). The European Model of Agriculture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199242160 Go to original source...
  5. Commission of the European Communities (2007). Agriculture Statistics and Economic Information. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
  6. Cooper, T., Baldock, D., Rayment, M., Kuhmonen, T., Terluin, I., Swales, V., Poux, X., Zakeossian, D., Farmer, M. (2006). An Evaluation of the Less Favoured Area Measure in the 25 Member States of the European Union. Brussels Report for Directorate-General Agriculture.
  7. Cooper, T., Hart, K., Baldock, D. (2009). The Provision of Public Goods through Agriculture in the European Union. Brussels: Directorate-General Agriculture. [CoA] Court of Auditors (2003). Report No. 4/2003. Rural Development Support for Less-Favoured Areas. Luxembourg: Court of Auditors of the EU.
  8. Crabtree, B. (2003). The Review of Area-based Less Favoured Area Payments across EU Member States. A report for the Land Use Policy Group.
  9. Cudlínová E., Lapka, M. (2012). An Environmental Society? Concepts, Policies, Outcomes. Prague: Karolinum Press. ISBN 978-8024620923.
  10. Dax, T., Hellegers, P. (2000). Policies for Less Favoured Areas. Chapter 11, in Brouwer, F., Lowe, P., eds., CAP Regimes and the Countryside. Newcastle: CABI Publishing. ISBN 9788-0851993546.
  11. Dax, T., Copus, A. (2016). Research for AGRI Committee - Rural Development Policy. Brussels: European Parliament. ISBN 978-9284601912.
  12. Directorate General Budget (1999, 2000 to 2013). EU Budget Report. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
  13. Dvorský, J., Jelínek, A., Koutná, K., Mana, V., Semrád, Z., Smrček, L. (2005). Integrated Handbook with Regard to Principles of Good Agricultural Practice. Prague, Opava: Ministry of Agriculture, Ekotoxa s.r.o.
  14. Dwyer, J. (2016). Approaches to Revitalise Rural Economies and Communities - Reflections of a Policy Analyst. European Countryside, 8(2), 175-182, https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2016-0014 Go to original source...
  15. Eurostat (2011). Eurostat Database ef-ov-kvaa. Overview of Agricultural Holdings. Accessed 12/05/2017.
  16. Firbank, L., Bradbury, R., McCracken, D., Stoate, C. (2013). Delivering Multiple Ecosystem Services from Enclosed Farmland in the UK. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 166, 65-75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.014 Go to original source...
  17. [IfLS] Institute for Rural Development Research (2012). Ex-post Evaluation of Rural Development Programmes 2000-2006. Contract number 30-CE-0387013/00-01. Report for Directorate-General Agriculture and Rural Development. Frankfurt/Main: John Wolfgang Goethe University.
  18. Jongeneel, R., Bezlepkina, I., Aramyan, K., Dillen, K., Swales, V., Landgrebe, R., Meister, A., Varela Ortéga, C., Poux, X., Karaczun, Z., Winston, J. (2005). Product-Based Assessments to Link Compliance to Standards at Farm Level to Competitiveness. Deliverable for the study on Compliance and competitiveness of European agriculture (funded from FP6 Strep project). The Hague: Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Wageningen UR.
  19. Jongeneel, R., Farmer, M., Mussner, R., de Roest, K., Meister, A., Varela Ortéga, C., Poux, X., Karaczun, Z., Winston, J. (2007). Compliance with Mandatory Standards in Agriculture. A Comparative Approach of the EU vis-à-vis the United States, Canada and New Zealand. Deliverable for the study on Compliance and competitiveness of European agriculture (funded from FP6 Strep project). The Hague: Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Wageningen UR.
  20. Kazukauskas, A., Newman, C., Sauer, J. (2014). The Impacts of Decoupled Subsidies on Productivity in Agriculture: a Cross-Country Analysis Using Microdata. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 45(3), 327-336, https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12068 Go to original source...
  21. Keenleyside, C., Allen, B., Hart, K., Baldock, D. (2012). Design and Implementation of Agri-Environmental Policies: are Guidelines Feasible? In: Evaluation of Agri-Environmental Policies: Selected Methodological Issues and Case Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264179332-4-en Go to original source...
  22. Kowalczyk, A., Kuzniar, A., Kostuch, M. (2014). Analysis of Criteria for Delimiting Less Favoured Mountain Areas. Water and Land Development, 22(1), 17-24, https://doi.org/10.2478/jwld-2014-0018 Go to original source...
  23. LEI (2010). Farm Viability in the European Union: Assessment of the Impact of Changes in Farm Payments. Report 2010-011. The Hague: LEI-DLO.
  24. Loriz-Hoffmann, J. (2011). Vorschlaege der Kommission fur die Laendliche Entwicklungspolitik nach 2013 (anglicky). Lambach, Austria: Directorate-General Agriculture.
  25. Madureira, L., Santos, J. L., Ferreira, A. C., Guimarães, H. (2013). Feasibility Study on the Valuation of Public Goods and Externalities in EU Agriculture. Ispra: Joint Research Centre.
  26. Matthews, A. (2016a). The Potential Implications of a Brexit for Future EU Agri-Food Policies. EuroChoices, 15(2), 17-23, https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692x.12128 Go to original source...
  27. Matthews, A. (2016b). Research for Agri Committee - the Future of Basic Supports. Report to the Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies, Agriculture and Rural Development. Brussels: European Parliament. ISBN 978-9284601912.
  28. Meyers, W., Ziolkowska, J. (2012). Sustainable Development Strategies - Patterns, Policies and Challenges for the Agricultural Sector, in Cudlínová, E., Lapka, M., eds., An Environmental Society? Concepts, Policies, Outcomes. Prague: Karolinum Press. ISBN 978-8024620923.
  29. Ministry of Agriculture (1998, 2004 to 2011). State of Agriculture Reports. [Retrieved 2016-02-11] Available at: http://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/ministerstvo-zemedelstvi/vyrocni-a-hodnotici-zpravy/zpravy-o-stavu-zemedelstvi/
  30. Ministry of Agriculture (2009). Annual Report on the Implementation of Rural Development Programme in 2007. Prague: Ministry of Agriculture. ISBN 978-8070847350.
  31. Ministry of Agriculture (2016). Ex-post Evaluation of Rural Development Plan 2007-2013. Prague: Ireas s.r.o.
  32. Nadal-Romero, E., Lasanta, T., Cerdà, A. (2016). Integrating Extensive Livestock and Soil Conservation Policies in Mediterranean Mountain Areas for Recovery of Abandoned Lands in the Central Spanish Pyrenees. A Long-Term Research Assessment. Land Degradation and Development, 29(2), 262-273, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2542 Go to original source...
  33. Nikodemus, O., Bell, S., Grine, I., Liepins, I. (2005). The Impact of Economic, Social and Political Factors on the Landscape Structure of the Vidzeme Uplands in Latvia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1-2), 57-67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.005 Go to original source...
  34. OECD (2008). Czech Republic Country Report. Paris: OECD.
  35. Pelucha, M., Kveton, V., Jilkova, J. (2013). Territorial Dimensions of Agro-Environmental Measures and LFA in Rural Development Policy in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 34, 91-103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.01.006 Go to original source...
  36. Pinto-Correia, T., Guerra, C. A. (2016). Linking Farm Management and Ecosystem Service Provision: Challenges and Opportunities for Soil Erosion Prevention in Mediterranean Silvo-Pastoral Systems. Land Use Policy, 51, 54-65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.028 Go to original source...
  37. Rizov, M., Pokrivcak, J., Ciaian, P. (2013). CAP Subsidies and Productivity of the Farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 537-557, https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12030 Go to original source...
  38. Rodrigo-Comino, J., Martínez-Hernández, C., Iserloh, T., Cerdà, A. (2017). The Contrasted Impact of Land Abandonment on Soil Erosion in Mediterranean Agriculture Fields. Land Use Policy, In press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60441-7 Go to original source...
  39. Rudow, K. (2014). Less Favoured Area Payments - Impacts on the Environment, a German perspective. Agricultural Economics, 60(6), 260-272, https://doi.org/10.17221/74/2013-agricecon Go to original source...
  40. Rutz, C., Dwyer, J., Schramek, J. (2014). More New Wine in the Same Old Bottles? The Evolving Nature of the CAP Reform Debate in Europe, and Prospects for the Future. Sociologia Ruralis, 54(3), 266-284, https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12033 Go to original source...
  41. Santos, J. L., Madureira, L., Ferreira, A. C., Espinosa, M., Gomez y Paloma, S. (2016). Building an Empirically-Based Framework to Value Multiple Public Goods of Agriculture at Broad Supranational Scales. Land Use Policy, 53, 56-70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.001 Go to original source...
  42. Schmitzberger, I., Wrbka, T., Steurer, B., Aschenbrenner, G., Peterseil, J., Zechmeister, H. G. (2005). How Farming Styles Influence Biodiversity Maintenance in Austrian Agricultural Landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 108(3), 274-290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.02.009 Go to original source...
  43. Tangermann, S. (2011). Basic Supports in the CAP Post 2013. Report to the Policy department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies, Agriculture and Rural Development. Brussels: European Parliament.
  44. Tima s.r.o. (2010). Mid-term Evaluation of Rural Development Programme 2007-2013. Prague: Ministry of Agriculture.
  45. Vrolijk H., de Bont, C., van der Veen, H., Wisman, J., Poppe, K. (2009). Volatility of Farm Incomes, Prices and Yields in the European Union. Report 2009-005. The Hague: LEI Wageningen UR.
  46. Wrbka, T., Erb, K. H., Schulz, N. B., Peterseil, J., Hahn, C. O., Haberl, H. (2004). Linking Pattern and Process in Cultural Landscapes. An Empirical Study Based on Spatially Explicit Indicators. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 289-306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.012 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.