Prague Economic Papers 2019, 28(5):516-531 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.712

Spatial Monopoly with Upgrades of Durable Goods

Yong-cong Yang1, Pu-yan Nie2, Zhao-hui Wang2, Zheng-xun Tan2
1 Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Institute of Studies for the Great Bay Area, Guangzhou, China;
2 Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Scientific Finance & industry, Guangzhou, China;

This paper establishes a two-stage Hotelling model to identify the implications of the upgrades of durable goods produced by a spatial monopoly. The major findings indicate that, due to the positive effects on profits of the upgrading of products, the monopoly has the motivation to launch upgraded versions with high quality instead of solely producing products with low quality. The monopoly, meanwhile, would not make a commitment to either the high-quality products or the low-quality ones. In addition, the price of the low-quality products decreases as upgraded ones appear on the market in a second stage, since no consumers would store the low-quality products for future consumption.

Keywords: durable goods, spatial monopoly, commitment, upgrade, game theory
JEL classification: C61, C72, D40, L10

Received: September 3, 2017; Accepted: October 5, 2018; Prepublished online: September 24, 2019; Published: November 1, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Yang, Y., Nie, P., Wang, Z., & Zheng-Xun, T. (2019). Spatial Monopoly with Upgrades of Durable Goods. Prague Economic Papers28(5), 516-531. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.712
Download citation

References

  1. Anton, J. J., Das, V. G. (2005). Storability, Market Structure, and Demand-shift Incentives. Rand Journal of Economics, 36(3), 520-543, https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.412601 Go to original source...
  2. Anton, J. J., Biglaiser, G. (2013). Quality, Upgrades and Equilibrium in a Dynamic Monopoly Market. Journal of Economic Theory, 148(3), 1179-1212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2012.12.006 Go to original source...
  3. Barsky, R. B., House, C. L., Kimball, M. S. (2007). Sticky-price Models and Durable Goods. American Economic Review, 97(3), 984-998, https://doi. org/10.1257/aer.97.3.984 Go to original source...
  4. Board, S. (2008). Durable-goods Monopoly with Varying Demand. Review of Economic Studies, 75(2), 391-413, https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00478.x Go to original source...
  5. Chakravorty, U., Leach, A., Moreaux, M. (2011). Would Hotelling kill the Electric Car? Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 61(3), 281-296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.08.005 Go to original source...
  6. Chen, Y. H., Wan, J. Y., Chan, W. (2015). Agricultural Subsidy with Capacity Constraints and Demand Elasticity. Agricultural Economics, 61(1), 39-49, https://doi. org/10.17221/60/2014-AGRICECON Go to original source...
  7. Chen, Y. H., Nie, P. Y., Wang, X. H. (2015). Asymmetric Duopoly Competition with Innovation Spillover and Input Constraints. Journal of Business Economics & Management, 16(6), 1124-1139, https://doi. org/10.3846/16111699.2013.823104 Go to original source...
  8. Chien, H. K., Chu, C. Y. C. (2008). Sale or Lease? Durable-goods Monopoly with Network Effects. Marketing Science, 27(6), 1012-1019, https://doi. org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0356 Go to original source...
  9. Coury, T., Petkov, V. P. (2008). Delegation and Commitment in Durable Goods Monopolies. Games & Economic Behavior, 63(1), 41-55, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.geb.2007.06.009 Go to original source...
  10. Dudine, P., Hendel, I., Lizzeri, A. (2006). Storable Good Monopoly: the Role of Commitment. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1706-1719, https://doi. org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1706 Go to original source...
  11. Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J. (1998). Upgrades, Trade-ins, and Buybacks. Rand Journal of Economics, 29(2), 235-258, https://doi. org/10.2307/2555887 Go to original source...
  12. Goering, G. E. (2008). Socially Concerned Firms and the Provision of Durable Goods. Economic Modelling, 25(3), 575-583, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.econmod.2007.10.001 Go to original source...
  13. Guo, L., Villas-Boas, J. M. (2007). Consumer Stockpiling and Price Competition in Differentiated Markets. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(4), 827-858, https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00159.x Go to original source...
  14. Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in Competition. Economic Journal, 39(153), 41-57, https://doi.org/10.2307/2224214 Go to original source...
  15. Johnson, J. P., Myatt, D. P. (2003). Multiproduct Quality Competition: Fighting Brands and Product Line Pruning. American Economic Review, 93(3), 748-774, https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322157070 Go to original source...
  16. Johnson, J. P., Myatt, D. P. (2006). Multiproduct Cournot Oligopoly. Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 583-601, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00032.x Go to original source...
  17. Krugman, P. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-959.
  18. Larralde, H., Stehlé, J., Jensen, P. (2009). Analytical Solution of a Multi-dimensional Hotelling Model with Quadratic Transportation Costs. Regional Science & Urban Economics, 39(3), 343-349, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.01.001 Go to original source...
  19. Loginova, O., Wang, X. H. (2011). Customization with Vertically Differentiated Products. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(2), 475-515, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1287440 Go to original source...
  20. Nie, P. Y. (2009). Commitment for Storable Goods under Vertical Integration. Economic Modelling, 26(2), 414-417, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2008.08.008 Go to original source...
  21. Nie, P. Y. (2010). Spatial Technology Spillover. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 44(4), 213-223.
  22. Nie, P. Y. (2011). Spatial Maintenance Goods under Monopoly. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 24(4), 16-26, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2011.11517486 Go to original source...
  23. Nie, P. Y. (2013). Innovation under Spatial Duopoly. Prague Economic Papers, 23(4), 474-486, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.463 Go to original source...
  24. Nie, P. Y., Sun, P. (2015). Search Costs Generating Industrial Clusters. Cities, 42, 268-273, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.08.002 Go to original source...
  25. Sobel, J. (1991). Durable Goods Monopoly with Entry of New Consumers. Econometrica, 59(5), 1455-1485, https://doi.org/10.2307/2938375 Go to original source...
  26. Vogel, J. (2008). Spatial Competition with Heterogeneous Firms. Journal of Political Economy, 116(3), 423-466, https://doi.org/10.1086/589891 Go to original source...
  27. Waldman, M. (2003). Durable Goods Theory for Real World Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 131-154, https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164985 Go to original source...
  28. Yang, Y. C., Nie, P. Y. (2015). R&D Subsidies under asymmetric cournot competition. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 830-842, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015. 1088791 Go to original source...
  29. Yang, Y. C., Nie, P. Y., Liu, H. T., Shen, M. H. (2018). On the Welfare Effects of Subsidy Game for Renewable Energy Investment: Toward a Dynamic Equilibrium Model. Renewable Energy, 121, 420-428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.097 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.