Prague Economic Papers 2019, 28(6):748-758 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.722

Contribution of the Behavioural Economics to the Explanation of the Gender Wage Level Differences

Dagmar Brožováa
a University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic

There is still a significant gender wage gap on labour markets in the majority of developed countries. The different earnings are determined mainly by the different sectors, professions and positions that men and women choose. The behavioural approach to interpretation of the labour market agents' decisions can help to explain the choice of different working career paths. The approach focuses on subjective individual preferences and their intrinsic rewards and motivations that cannot be explained by objective rational rules. The paper confirms the different relation of men and women to risk and competition and different preferences to intrinsic and extrinsic motivations and rewards. The author's existing research on Czech data is used. Women indeed preferred a lower risk, although the difference was not large (-0.7 points on a scale of 0-10), while gender does not matter for people with university education. The level of accepted risk was increased by education, career preferences, pride and partnership. On the contrary, having children and their number did not affect the level of accepted risk. As far as extrinsic and intrinsic rewards and motivations were concerned, the preference for intrinsic rewards was higher among women (44%) than men (31%). Women preferred intrinsic rewards compared to higher wages more likely than men. Women with university education preferred intrinsic rewards with the same probability as men with the same degree of education. The preference of non-monetary rewards and motivation increased with higher education.

Keywords: rational choice model, behavioural model of the human agent, risk preference, social preference, intrinsic rewards, extrinsic rewards
JEL classification: D91, J16

Received: May 14, 2018; Accepted: January 24, 2019; Prepublished online: September 24, 2019; Published: December 21, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Brožová, D. (2019). Contribution of the Behavioural Economics to the Explanation of the Gender Wage Level Differences. Prague Economic Papers, 28(6), 748-758. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.722
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alesina, A., Giuliano, P., Bisin, A. et al. (2011). Preferences for Redistribution, in Benhabib, J., Bisin, A., Jackson, M., eds., Handbook of Social Economics. North Holland, pp. 93-132. ISBN 978-0080932446 (e-book). Go to original source...
    2. Atkinson, S., Baird, S., Frye, M. (2003). Do Female Mutual Fund Managers Manage Differently? Journal of Financial Research, 26(1), 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6803.00041 Go to original source...
    3. Barbulescu, R., Bidwell, M. (2013). Do Women Choose Different Jobs from Men? Mechanism of Application Segregation in the Market for Managerial Workers. Organization Science, 24(3), 737-756, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0757 Go to original source...
    4. Bertrand, M., Goldin, C., Katz, F. (2010). Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3), 228-255, https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.3.228 Go to original source...
    5. Betz, M., O'Connell, L. (1989). Work Orientation of Males and Females: Exploring the Gender Socialization Approach. Sociological Inquiry, 59(3), 318-330, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1989.tb00109.x Go to original source...
    6. Blau, F., Kahn, L. (2016). The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanation. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA Working Paper No. 21913, https://doi.org/10.3386/w21913 Go to original source...
    7. Bohnet, I. (2016). What Works: Gender Equality by Design. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674089037. Go to original source...
    8. Brožová, D., Stroukal, D. (2018). Gender Differences in Preference of the Wage Level and Risk on the Czech Labour Market. European Scientific Journal, 14(4), 73-90, https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n4p73 Go to original source...
    9. Croson, R., Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economics Literature, 47(2), 448-474, https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.448 Go to original source...
    10. Daymont, T., Andrisani, P. (1984). Job Preferences, College Major, and the Gender Gap in Earnings. The Journal of Human Resources, 19(3), 408-428, https://doi.org/10.2307/145880 Go to original source...
    11. Goldin, C. (2014). A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter. American Economic Review, 104(4), 1091-1119, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.4.1091 Go to original source...
    12. Johnson, J., Powel, P. (1994). Decision Making, Risk and Gender: Are Managers Different? British Journal of Management, 5(2), 123-138, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1994.tb00073.x Go to original source...
    13. Marini, M. M., Fan, P.-L., Finley E. et al. (1996). Gender and Job Values. Sociology of Education, 69(1), 49-65, https://doi.org/10.2307/2112723 Go to original source...
    14. Miles, P. (2013). Why Do Educated, Successful Women Leave the Workforce? American International Journal of Social Science, 2(2).
    15. Schurkov, O., Eckel, C. (2017). Gender Differences in Behavioral Traits and Labor Market Outcomes. Available at: https://www.wellesley.edu/sites/default/files/asset:economics/files/schurkoveckelchapter201705.pdf
    16. Tolbert, P., Moen, P. (1998). Men's and Women's Definition of "Good" Jobs: Similarities and Differences by Age and Across Time. Cornell University. Available at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content