Prague Economic Papers 2019, 28(6):670-687 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.727

The Hold-up Problem and Banking Relationships: Evidence from the Polish SME Sector

Marcin Grzelaka
a Warsaw School of Economics, Institute of Value Management, Poland

This paper investigates how lender-borrower relationships affect credit cost for small and medium sized companies (SMEs). We use data within the period 2006–2015 for the Polish SME sector and deploy panel regression models to analyse how the number and length of banking relationships influence the financial costs of a random sample of Polish SMEs. We document that the price of capital decreases as relationships progress. Outcomes of the research are thus inconsistent with the “hold-up” hypothesis. Moreover, we find evidence that supports the view that multiple banking relationships generate more financial benefits for companies than a relationship with one lender.

Keywords: banking relationship, hold-up problem, information asymmetry, bank lending
JEL classification: D82, G21, G32

Received: March 21, 2018; Accepted: April 15, 2019; Prepublished online: September 24, 2019; Published: December 21, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Grzelak, M. (2019). The Hold-up Problem and Banking Relationships: Evidence from the Polish SME Sector. Prague Economic Papers28(6), 670-687. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.727
Download citation

References

  1. Angelini, P., Di Salvo, R., Ferri, G. (1998). Availability and Cost of Credit for Small Businesses: Customer Relationships and Credit Cooperatives. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6-8), 925-954, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(98)00008-9 Go to original source...
  2. Bateman, M. (2000). Neo-Liberalism, SME Development and the Role of Business Support Centres in the Transition Economies of Central and Eastern Europe. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 275-298, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008170805013 Go to original source...
  3. Berger, A. N., Udell, G. F. (1995). Relationship Lending and Lines of Credit in Small Firm Finance. The Journal of Business, 68(3), 351-381, https://doi.org/10.1086/296668 Go to original source...
  4. Bonfim, D., Dai, Q., Franco, F. (2018). The Number of Bank Relationships and Borrowing Costs: The Role of Information Asymmetries. Journal of Empirical Finance, 46, 191-209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2017.12.005 Go to original source...
  5. Bonini, S., Dell'Acqua, A., Fungo, M., Kysucky, V. (2016). Credit Market Concentration, Relationship Lending and the Cost of Debt. International Review of Financial Analysis, 45, 172-179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.03.013 Go to original source...
  6. Boot, A. W. A. (2000). Relationship Banking: What Do We Know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(1), 7-25, https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.2000.0282 Go to original source...
  7. Boot, A. W. A., Thakor, A. V. (1994). Moral Hazard and Secured Lending in an Infinitely Repeated Credit Market Game. International Economic Review, 35(4), 899-920, https://doi.org/10.2307/2527003 Go to original source...
  8. Cenni, S., Monferrà, S., Salotti, V., Sangiorgi, M., Torluccio, G. (2015). Credit Rationing and Relationship Lending. Does Firm Size Matter? Journal of Banking & Finance, 53, 249-265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.12.010 Go to original source...
  9. D'Auria, C., Foglia, A., Reedtz, P. M. (1999). Bank Interest Rates and Credit Relationships in Italy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(7), 1067-1093, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(98)00131-9 Go to original source...
  10. Degryse, H., Ongena, S. (2001). Bank Relationships and Firm Profitability. Financial Management, 30(1), 9-34, https://doi.org/10.2307/3666389 Go to original source...
  11. Degryse, H., Ongena, S. (2005). Distance, Lending Relationships, and Competition. The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 231-266, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00729.x Go to original source...
  12. Degryse, H., Van Cayseele, P. (2000). Relationship Lending within a Bank-Based System: Evidence from European Small Business Data. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(1), 90-109, https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.1999.0278 Go to original source...
  13. Detragiache, E., Garella, P., Guiso, L. (2000). Multiple versus Single Banking Relationships: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Finance, 55(3), 1133-1161, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00243 Go to original source...
  14. Dong, B., Guo, G. (2011). The Relationship Banking Paradox: No pain no Gain versus Raison D'être. Economic Modelling, 28(5), 2263-2270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.06.009 Go to original source...
  15. Elsas, R., Krahnen, J. P. (1998). Is Relationship Lending Special? Evidence from Credit-File Data in Germany. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(10-11), 1283-1316, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(98)00063-6 Go to original source...
  16. European Commission (2003). Commission Recommendation Concerning the Definition of Micro, Small and Medium-sized Companies, May, 6.
  17. Farinha, L. A., Santos, J. A. C. (2002). Switching from Single to Multiple Bank Lending Relationships: Determinants and Implications. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 11(2), 124-151, https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.2001.0328 Go to original source...
  18. Ger¹l, A., Jakubík, P. (2016). Relationship Lending in Emerging Markets: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Global Banking Crises and Emerging Markets, 75-97, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56905-9_5 Go to original source...
  19. GUS (2015). Small and medium non-financial enterprises in Poland 2009-2013. Warszawa: Statistics Poland.
  20. GUS (2016). Structural changes of groups of the national economy entities in the REGON register, 2015. Warszawa: Statistics Poland.
  21. Greenbaum, S. I., Kanatas, G., Venezia, I. (1989). Equilibrium Loan Pricing under the Bank-client Relationship. Journal of Banking & Finance, 13(2), 221-235, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(89)90061-7 Go to original source...
  22. Guiso, L., Minetti, R. (2010). The Structure of Multiple Credit Relationships: Evidence from U.S. Firms. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42(6), 1037-1071, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2010.00319.x Go to original source...
  23. Harhoff, D., Körting, T. (1998). Lending Relationships in Germany - Empirical Evidence from Survey Data. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(10-11), 1317-1353, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(98)00061-2 Go to original source...
  24. Hasan, I., Jackowicz, K., Kowalewski, O., Koz³owski, £. (2017). Do Local Banking Market Structures Matter for SME Financing and Performance? New Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 79, 142-158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.03.009 Go to original source...
  25. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., Loveman, G. (1995). Financial System Reform in Poland: Lessons from Japan's Main Bank System, in Aoki, M., Patrick, H., eds., The Japanese Main Bank System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 592-634, https://doi.org/10.1093/0198288999.003.0017 Go to original source...
  26. Ioannidou, V., Ongena, S. (2010). "Time for a Change": Loan Conditions and Bank Behavior when Firms Switch Banks. The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1847-1877, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01596.x Go to original source...
  27. Iwanicz-Drozdowska, M., Jackowicz, K., Koz³owski, £. (2018). SMEs' Near-Death Experiences. Do Local Banks Extend a Helping Hand? Emerging Markets Review, 37, 47-65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2018.05.004 Go to original source...
  28. Lehmann, E., Neuberger, D. (2001). Do Lending Relationships Matter? Evidence from Bank Survey in Germany. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45(4), 339-359, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(01)00151-2 Go to original source...
  29. Mattes, J. A., Steffen, S., Wahrenburg, M. (2012). Do Information Rents in Loan Spreads Persist over the Business Cycles? Journal of Financial Services Research, 43(2), 175-195, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-012-0129-z Go to original source...
  30. Memmel, C., Schmieder, C., Stein, I. (2007). Relationship Lending - Empirical Evidence for Germany. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper 14/2007. Go to original source...
  31. Ongena, S., Smith, D. C. (2000). What Determines the Number of Bank Relationships? Cross-Country Evidence. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(1), 26-56, https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.1999.0273 Go to original source...
  32. Ongena, S., Smith, D. C. (2001). The Duration of Bank Relationships. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), 449-475, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00069-1 Go to original source...
  33. PARP (2016). Report on the Condition of SME Sector in Poland. Warszawa: Polish Agency for Enterprise Development.
  34. Peltoniemi, J. (2007). The Benefits of Relationship Banking: Evidence from Small Business Financing in Finland. Journal of Financial Services Research, 31(2-3), 153-171, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-007-0009-0 Go to original source...
  35. Petersen, M. A., Rajan, R. G. (1994). The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data. The Journal of Finance, 49(1), 3-37, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04418.x Go to original source...
  36. Petersen, M. A., Rajan, R. G. (1995). The Effect of Credit Market Competition on Lending Relationships. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 407-443, https://doi.org/10.2307/2118445 Go to original source...
  37. Pozzolo, A. F. (2004). The Role of Guarantees in Bank Lending. EFMA 2004. Basel Meetings Paper, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.498982 Go to original source...
  38. Rajan, R. G. (1992). Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice between Informed and Arm's-Length Debt. The Journal of Finance, 47, 1367-1400, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04662.x Go to original source...
  39. Santikian, L. (2014). The Ties that Bind: Bank Relationships and Small Business Lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 23(2), 177-213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2013.11.004 Go to original source...
  40. Saunders, A., Steffen, S. (2011). The Costs of Being Private: Evidence from the Loan Market. Review of Financial Studies, 24(12), 4091-4122, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr083 Go to original source...
  41. Schenone, C. (2009). Lending Relationships and Information Rents: Do Banks Exploit Their Information Advantages? Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 1149-1199, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp080 Go to original source...
  42. Sharpe, S. A. (1990). Asymmetric Information, Bank Lending, and Implicit Contracts: A Stylized Model of Customer Relationships. The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1069-1087, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb02427.x Go to original source...
  43. S³omka-Go³êbiowska, A., Urbanek, P. (2016). Corporate Boards, Large Blockholders and Executive Compensation in Banks: Evidence from Poland. Emerging Markets Review, 28, 203-220, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2016.08.001 Go to original source...
  44. Von Thadden, E. L. (2004). Asymmetric Information, Bank Lending and Implicit Contracts: the Winner's Curse. Finance Research Letters, 1(1), 11-23, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1544-6123(03)00006-0. Go to original source...
  45. Weinstein, D. E., Yafeh, Y. (1998). On the Costs of a Bank-Centered Financial System: Evidence from the Changing Main Bank Relations in Japan. The Journal of Finance, 53(2), 635-672, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.254893 Go to original source...
  46. Zhang, X., Song, Z., Zhong, Z. (2016). Does "Small Bank Advantage" Really Exist? Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 42, 368-384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.10.009 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.