Politická ekonomie 2015, 63(8):1006-1031 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1049

Národohospodářské efekty privatizačního procesu v České republice

Karel Zeman
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.

National Economics Effects of the Privatization Process in the Czech Republic

The transformation of centrally planned economy to a market economy has confi rmed that the basic premise for the economic policy, characterized by liberal market economy, is democratically established property rights. This text analyzes the National Economic effects of one of the most complex transformation processes, which is the process of privatization. This publication examines all three legal regimes through which were the entire privatization process implemented. These are "The Small Privatization" according to the Act no. 427/1990 Coll., "The Large-scale Privatization" according to the Act no. 92/1991 Coll. and "The privatization of agricultural and forestry property" according to the Act no. 229/1991 Coll. and the Act no. 95/1999 Coll., with respect to the: affected economic theories, theory of property rights in particular, transaction costs theory, theory of interested groups, rent-seeking theory, theory of government failure, etc.; macroeconomic analysis of the process itself; macroeconomic analysis of the use of the proceeds from the privatization process; evaluation of the National Economic effects, whether positive or negative, of the privatization process in the Czech Republic. The aim of this text is to provide professional and comprehensive overview of the National Economic effects of the privatization process as a whole, which has not been published until now by any author in view of the fact that the perception of the privatization process of the professionals and the general public has been narrowed to a process implemented by the National Property Fund and the Ministry of Finance (by selling shares through vouchers). Finally, the aim of this publication is to analyze the application of economic theories within the privatization process in the Czech Republic which describes the pros and cons of this unique economic and national economy "experiment".

Keywords: state property, rent-seeking, property rights, privatization process, national property fund of the Czech Republic, land fund of the Czech Republic
JEL classification: H81, H82, P21, P26, Q15

Published: December 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zeman, K. (2015). National Economics Effects of the Privatization Process in the Czech Republic. Politická ekonomie63(8), 1006-1031. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1049
Download citation

References

  1. ALEMANN, U. von. 1987. Organisierte Interessen in der Bundesrepublik. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1987. 199 s. ISBN 978-381-0006-172. Go to original source...
  2. ALCHIAN, A. 1973. The Property Right Paradigm. The Journal of Economic History. 1973. Vol. 33, pp. 16-19. Go to original source...
  3. ANDERSON, T. L.; MCCHESNEY, F. S. 2003. Property Rights: Cooperation, Conflict and Law. Princeton University Press, 2003. ISBN 978-069-109-9989. Go to original source...
  4. BUCHANAN, J. M. 1980. Rent Seeking and Profit Seeking. In BUCHANAN, J. M.; TOLLISON, R. D.; TULLOCK, G. (eds). Toward a Theory of the Rent Seeking Society. Texas: A&M University Press, 1980.
  5. BUCHANAN, J. M. 1996. Hranice slobody medzi anarchiou a Leviatanom. Bratislava: Archa, 1996. 235 s. ISBN 80-7115-072-X.
  6. COASE, H. R. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law & Economics. 1960. Vol. 3, pp. 1-44. Dostupné na: http://www.jstor.org/stable/724810 Go to original source...
  7. DEMSETZ, H. 1967. Toward a Theory of Property Right. The American Economic Review. 1967. Vol. 57, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Seventy-ninth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. pp. 347-359. Dostupné na: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1821637
  8. FNM ČR. 1991-2010. Výroční zprávy. Fond národního majetku ČR. Dostupné na: http://www.mfcr.cz/cs/archiv/agenda-byvaleho-fnm/sprava-majetku/vyrocni-zpravy-fnm
  9. HAMERNÍKOVÁ, B.; MAAYTOVÁ, A. a kol. 2010. Veřejné finance. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2010. 340 s. ISBN 978-80-7357-497-0.
  10. JEŽEK, T. 2006. Privatizace české ekonomiky: její kořeny, metody a výsledky. Praha: Oeconomica, 2006. 142 s. ISBN 978-80-245-1069-3.
  11. KRUEGER, A. O. 1974. The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society. The American Economic Review. 1974. Vol 64, No. 3, pp. 291-303.
  12. MF ČR. 2010. Státní závěrečný účet za rok 2010. Ministerstvo financí ČR. Dostupné na: http://www.mfcr.cz/cs/verejny-sektor/monitoring/plneni-statniho-rozpoctu/2010/statni-zaverecny-ucet-za-rok-2010-2059
  13. MF ČR. 2015. Statistika státního dluhu - 4. čtvrtletí 2014. Ministerstvo financí ČR. Dostupné na: http://www.mfcr.cz/cs/verejny-sektor/monitoring/statistika-vladniho-sektoru/2014/statistika-statniho-dluhu-4-ctvrtleti-20-20811
  14. NORTH, D. C.; DAVIS, L. 1970. Institucional Change and American Economic Growth: A First Step Towards a Theory of Institutional Innovation. The Journal of Economic History. Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 131-149. Go to original source...
  15. OLSON, M. 2002. The logic of collective action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press, 2002. 186 s. ISBN 978-067-4537-514.
  16. PF ČR. 1994-2010. Výroční zprávy. Pozemkový fond ČR. Dostupné na: http://www.spucr.cz/dokumenty-ke-stazeni/archiv-dokumentu-pf-cr
  17. RICARDO, D. 2004. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Dover Publications, 2004. 320 s. ISBN 978-0486-434-612.
  18. STIGLITZ, J. E. 1997. Ekonomie veřejného sektoru. Praha: Grada, 1997. ISBN 80-7169-454-1.
  19. TULLOCK, G. 2005. The rent-seeking society. Liberty Fund, 2005. 342 s. ISBN 978-0865-975-354.
  20. VOIGHT, S. 2008. Institucionární ekonomie. Praha: Alfa nakladatelství a Liberální institut, 2008. 959 s. ISBN 80-86389-53-7.
  21. WILLIAMSON, O. E. 1981. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 548-577. Dostupné na: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2778934 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.