Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
TEORETICKÝ ČASOPIS • ISSN 0032-3233 (Print) • ISSN 2336-8225 (Online)

Politická ekonomie Vol. 64 No. 1

Může být přirozená úroková míra nulová? Neoklasický přístup

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1056

[plný text (PDF)]

Pavel Potužák

Very low real rates of interest observed in modern economies might be caused by the fact that the natural rate of interest declined to a zero level. This article shows that a zero or a negative natural interest can be explained by the Böhm-Bawerkian and neoclassical theory. Firstly, two senses of time preference are introduced in a discounted utility model, and key determinants of the zero interest rate on the side of time preference are discussed in detail. Secondly, a simple general equilibrium model with fixed intertemporal endowment is presented. Within this model, a decreasing shape of the income stream is identified as a major source of zero interest along with a low intertemporal elasticity of substitution in consumption. Even in the world of zero or negative natural interest, it might be optimal to be a lender. The last section focuses on the role of marginal productivity of capital in the model, stressing the role of this phenomenon on one side and time preference on the other in lowering the natural rate of interest to a zero level.

JEL klasifikace: B13, B21, B22, B53, E43

Reference:
Abel, A. B., Mankiw, N. G., Summers, L. H., Zeckhauser, R. J. (1989). Assessing Dynamic Effi ciency:

Theory and Evidence. The Review of Economic Studies, 56(1), 1–19. DOI: 10.2307/2297746.

Barro, R. J., Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic Growth. 2. vyd. Cambridge: MIT Press.

ISBN 0-262-02553-1.

Ročník 64 | číslo 01 | 2016 POLITICKÁ EKONOMIE 107

Becker, G. S., Mulligan, C. B. (1997). The Endogenous Determination of Time Preference.

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 729−58. DOI: 10.1162/003355397555334.

Blanchard, O. J.; Fischer, S. 1989. Lectures on Macroeconomics, Cambridge, MT : MIT Press.

ISBN: 0-262-02283-4.

Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1890). Capital and Interest. New York: McMillan and Co.

Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1891). Positive Theory of Capital. New York: G. E. Stechert & Co.

Broome, J. (1994). Discounting the Future. Philosophy & Public Aff airs, 23(2), 128−56.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1994.tb00008.x.

Brown, H. G. (1913). The Marginal Productivity versus the Impatience Theory of Interest.

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 27(4), 630–50. DOI: 10.2307/1883445.

Epstein, L. G., Hynes, J. A. (1983). The Rate of Time Preference and Dynamic Economic Analysis.

Journal of Political Economy, 91(4), 611–35. DOI: 10.1086/261168.

Fetter, F. A. (1902). The "Roundabout Process" in the Interest Theory. The Quarterly Journal

of Economics, 17(1), 163–80. DOI: 10.2307/1884714.

Fetter, F. A. (1928). Economics. New York: The Century Co.

Fisher, I. (1907). The Rate of Interest. Its Nature, Determination and Relation to Economic

Phenomena. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Fisher, I. (1930). Theory of Interest. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time Discounting and Time Preference:

A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401. DOI: 10.1257/jel.40.2.351.

Friedman, M. (1969). The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

ISBN 0-202-06030-6.

Hayek, F. A. (1941). The Pure Theory of Capital. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

ISBN 0-226-32081-2.

Holman, R. (1993). Některé kontroverze v moderní teorii kapitálu. Politická ekonomie, 41(3),

407–420.

Hudík, M. (2011). Rothbardian Demand: A Critique. The Review of Austrian Economics, 24(3),

311−8. DOI: 10.1007/s11138-011-0147-3.

Jevons, W. S. (1957). The Theory of Political Economy. 5. vyd. New York: Sentry Press.

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Harcourt,

Brace and Company.

Kirzner, I. (2011). The Pure Time-Preference Theory of Interest: An Attempt at Clarifi cation,

in Herbener, J. M., ed., The Pure Time-Preference Theory of Interest. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von

Mises Institute, pp. 99−126. ISBN: 978-1-61016-236-4.

Klaus, V., Tříska, D. (2007). Ke kritice používání konceptu solidarity a diskriminace

v intertemporální analýze tzv. globálních problémů. Politická ekonomie, 55(6), 723–750.

DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.621.

Knight, F. H. (1934). Capital, Time, and the Interest Rate. Economica, New Series, 1(3), 257–286.

DOI: 10.2307/2548804.

Leland, H. E. (1968). Saving and Uncertainty: The Precautionary Demand for Saving.

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(3), 465–473. DOI: 10.2307/1879518.

Loewenstein, G. (1992). The Fall and Rise of Psychological Explanations in the Economics

of Intertemporal Choice, in Loewenstein, G., Elster, J., eds., Choice over Time. New York:

Russell Sage, pp. 3–34. ISBN: 0-871-54558-6.

108 POLITICKÁ EKONOMIE Ročník 64 | číslo 01 | 2016

Mises, L. (1996). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. 4. vyd. San Francisco, CA: Fox & Wilkes.

ISBN: 0-930073-18-5.

Murphy, R. P. (2003). Unanticipated Intertemporal Change in Theories of Interest.

Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University.

Olson, M., Bailey, M. J. (1981). Positive Time Preference. Journal of Political Economy, 89(1), 1–25.

DOI: 10.1086/260947.

Prelec, D., Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decision Making over Time and under Uncertainty:

A Common Approach. Management Science, 37(7), 770–786. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.37.7.770.

Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A Mathematical Theory of Saving. Economic Journal, 38(152), 543–559.

DOI: 10.2307/2224098.

Ricardo, D. (2001). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. 3. vyd. Ontario:

Batoche Books.

Romer, D. (2006). Advanced Macroeconomics. 3. vyd. New York: McGraw – Hill.

ISBN: 0-07-287730-8.

Rothbard, M. N. (2004). Man, Economy, and State. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

ISBN: 0-945466-30-7.

Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A Note on Measurement of Utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2),

155–61. DOI: 10.2307/2967612.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profi ts, Capital,

Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Oxford, NY [US] : Oxford University Press.

ISBN: 0-195-00461-2.

Strotz, R. H. (1956). Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. The Review

of Economic Studies, 23(3), 165–80. DOI: 10.2307/2295722.

Špecián, P. (2012). Svět a věda u Ludwiga von Misese. Esej o misesovské metafyzice. Filozofi a,

67(4), 335–346.

Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference

Series on Public Policy, 39(1), 195–214. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-L.