Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
TEORETICKÝ ČASOPIS • ISSN 0032-3233 (Print) • ISSN 2336-8225 (Online)

Politická ekonomie Vol. 65 No. 4

Ekonomická analýza referenda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1155

[plný text (PDF)]

Petr Špecián

The paper synthesizes the current literature regarding information aggregation, voter competence, voting paradox and behavioral economics in order to answer the question whether the phenomenon of "wisdom of the crowds" can be reasonably relied upon during a referendum. Review of the ‘wisdom of the crowds’ research reveals two key assumptions: voter competence and voter independence. Although direct testing of the actual fulfillment of these assumptions in a real-world setting is not possible, both empirical literature on voting behavior and rational choice theory provide ample ground for skepticism in this regard. Low level of knowledge together with unmitigated influence of systematic biases is expected to dominate the actual voting behavior. Affect heuristic is used as an example to illustrate this point. The paper concludes that referendum does not seem to be a reliable way to revealing preferences regarding various social issues.

JEL klasifikace: D60, D72, D83

Reference:
Achen, Ch. H., Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce

Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691169446.

Althaus, S. L. (2003). Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the will of the People. New York City: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521527873.

Brennan, G., Lomasky, L. (1997). Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521585248.

Brennan, J. (2014). How Smart Is Democracy? You Can’t Answer that Question a Priori. Critical Review, 26(1–2), 33–58, https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2014.907040

Buchanan, J. M. (1987). The Constitution of Economic Policy. The American Economic Review,

77(3), 243–250.

Caplan, B. (2008). The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies.

Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691138732.

Caplan, B. (2012). The Myth of the Rational Voter and Political Theory, in Landemore, H., Elster, J., eds., Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781107010338.

Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity.

Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591–621, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.

psych.55.090902.142015

Clark, Sherman J. (1998). A Populist Critique of Direct Democracy. Harvard Law Review, 112(2), 434–482, https://doi.org/10.2307/1342426

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper. ISBN 0060417501.

Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the Cognitive and the Psychodynamic Unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709–724, https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.49.8.709

Grofman, B., Owen, G., Feld, S. L. (1983). Thirteen Theorems in Search of the Truth. Theory and Decision, 15(3), 261–278, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125672

Haidt, J. (2013). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Vintage. ISBN 0307455777.

Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review, 35(4),

519–530.

Hillman, A. L. (2010). Expressive Behavior in Economics and Politics. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 403–418, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.06.004

Hong, L., Page, S. E. (2004). Groups of Diverse Problem Solvers Can Outperform Groups of

High-Ability Problem Solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(46), 16385– 16389, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403723101

Kahan, D. M. (2015). The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm. Emerging Trends in

Social & Behavioral Sciences, v tisku. Dostupné z: [cit. 12. 1. 2017] https://ssrn.com/

abstract=2703011

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475, https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane. ISBN 9780374275631.

Landemore, H. (2012a). The Mechanisms of Collective Intelligence in Politics, in Landemore, H., Elster, J., eds., Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, s. 251–89. ISBN 9781107010338.

Landemore, H. (2012b). Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691155654.

Landemore, H. (2014). Yes, We Can (Make It Up on Volume): Answers to Critics. Critical Review, 26(1–2), 184–237, https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2014.940780

Linek, L., Pecháček, Š. (2006). Základní charakteristiky členské základny KDU-ČSL. Sociologické studie / Sociological Studies. Praha: Sociologický ústav. ISBN 807330094X.

Lucas, G., Tasić, S. (2015). Behavioral Public Choice and the Law. West Virginia Law Review, 118, 199–266.

Lupia, A. (2006). How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence. Critical Review,

18(1–3), 217–232, https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443658

Matějka, F., Tabellini, G. (2015). Electoral Competition with Rationally Inattentive Voters. CESifo. Working Paper Series No. 5849. Dostupné z: [cit. 15. 1. 2017] https://ssrn.com/abstract=2774041

Matsusaka, J. G. (2005). Direct Democracy Works. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(2),

185–206, https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330054048713

Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public Choice III. 3. vyd. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521894753.

Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine, Atherton. ISBN 9780202309590.

Page, S. E. (2008). The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691138541.

Peltzman, S. (1984). Constituent Interest and Congressional Voting. The Journal of Law

& Economics, 27(1), 181–210, https://doi.org/10.1086/467062

Skala, D. (2008). Overconfidence in Psychology and Finance – An Interdisciplinary Literature Review. Bank i Kredyt, 39(4), 33–50.

Slovic, P., Finucane, Me. L., Peters, E., MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The Affect Heuristic.

European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

ejor.2005.04.006

Somin, I. (2013). Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter.

Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0804786614.

Somin, I. (2014). Why Political Ignorance Undermines the Wisdom of the Many. Critical Review, 26(1–2), 151–169, https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2014.907047

Špecián, P. (2015). Potřebuje ekonomie psychologii? Teorie vědy, 37(3), 279–301.

Sunstein, C. R. (2000). Cognition and Cost-Benefit Analysis. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(2), 1059–1103, https://doi.org/10.1086/468105

Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Anchor Books. ISBN 0385721706.

Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. 1. vyd. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 9780393080940.

Thompson, A. (2014). Does Diversity Trump Ability? An Example of the Misuse of Mathematics

in the Social Sciences. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 63(9), 1024–1030,

http://doi.org/10.1090/noti1163

Tirole, J. (2002). Rational Irrationality: Some Economics of Self-Management. European

Economic Review, 46(4–5), 633–655, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00206-9

Tresch, R. W. (2014). Public Finance: A Normative Theory. 3. vyd. Amsterdam: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0124158344.

Vermeule, A. (2012). Collective Wisdom and Institutional Design, in Landemore, H., Elster, J., eds., Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, s. 338–67. ISBN 9781107010338.