Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
TEORETICKÝ ČASOPIS • ISSN 0032-3233 (Print) • ISSN 2336-8225 (Online)

Politická ekonomie Vol. 66 No. 5

Vnímání příjmových nerovností a preference ohledně rozdělení příjmů v České republice

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1209

[plný text (PDF)]

Ivan Petrúšek

A representative survey of adult population is used to analyse perceptions of existing income inequality and preferences for ideal income distribution in the Czech Republic. On average, Czechs view the distribution of disposable income as more unequal than it actually is. This biased perception results from underestimating total income shares belonging to bottom quintiles and overestimating the total income share belonging to the top income quintile. Whereas the majority of Czechs prefer some level of income stratification, there are about four tenths of people who would prefer to live in a completely equal society. These are primarily older, less educated and lower income people whose preferences formulated under uncertainty are mostly consistent with the maximin principle and inequality aversion. Almost a fifth of Czechs would prefer an income distribution consistent with efficiency concerns.

JEL klasifikace: D31, D63, D83

Reference:
Albert, S., Duffy, J. (2012). Differences in Risk Aversion between Young and Older Adults.

Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics, 1, 3–9, https://doi.org/10.2147/NAN.S27184

Alesina, A., Giuliano, P. (2011). Preferences for Redistribution, in Benhabib, J., Bisin, A., Jackson, M. O., eds., Handbook of social economics. Vol. 1A (first edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 93–131. ISBN 978-0-444-53187-2.

Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: what can be done? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

ISBN 978-0-674-50476-9.

Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., Tetaz, M. (2013). Biased Perceptions of Income Distribution and Preferences for Redistribution: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 100–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.009

Engelhardt, C., Wagener, A. (2014). Biased Perceptions of Income Inequality and Redistribution. Kiel und Hamburg: ZBW. Dostupné z: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/100395

Engelmann, D., Strobel, M. (2004). Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments. The American Economic Review, 94(4), 857–869, https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002741. Dostupné z: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592796

Fehr, E., Naef, M., Schmidt, K. M. (2005). The Role of Equality and Efficiency in Social Preferences. Social Science Research Network. Rochester SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 883712. Dostupné z: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=883712

Gimpelson, V., Treisman, D. (2015). Misperceiving Inequality. IZA Discussion Papers. Working Paper No. 9100. Dostupné z: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/113975

Handcock, M. S., Morris, M. (1999). Relative Distribution Methods in the Social Sciences. New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-98778-9.

Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A., Ordóñez, L. D. (1993). Judgments of Social Justice: Compromises between Equality and Efficiency. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 65(4), 629–639, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.629

Neckerman, K. M., Torche, F. (2007). Inequality: Causes and Consequences. Annual Review

of Sociology, 33(1), 335–357, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131755

Norton, M. I., Ariely, D. (2011). Building a Better America-One Wealth Quintile

at a Time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 9–12, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524

Norton, M. I., Neal, D. T., Govan, C. L., Ariely, D., Holland, E. (2014). The Not-So-Common-Wealth of Australia: Evidence for a Cross-Cultural Desire for a More Equal Distribution of Wealth. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14(1), 339–351, https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12058

Okun, A. M. (2015). Equality and Efficiency: the Big Tradeoff. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 978-0-8157-2653-1.

Ordónez, L. D., Mellers, B. A., (1993). Trade-offs in Fairness and Preference Judgments, in Mellers, B. A., Baron, J., eds., Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–154. ISBN 978-0-521-43199-6.

Pålsson, A.-M. (1996). Does the Degree of Relative Risk Aversion Vary with Household

Characteristics? Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(6), 771–787, https://doi.org/10.1016/

S0167-4870(96)00039-6

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-43000-6.

Piketty, T. (2015). The Economics of Inequality. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard

University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-50480-6.

Rae, D. W., Yates, D., Hochschild, J., Morone, J., Fessler, C. (1981). Equalities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-25980-7.

Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-00077-3.

Řeháková, B. (2000). Jak vnímáme příjmové nerovnosti a jaké bychom je chtěli mít. Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 36(1), 23–40.

Schwartz, B. (2011). A New Veil of Ignorance? Commentary on Norton and Ariely (2011).

Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 19–20, https://doi.

org/10.1177/1745691610393530

Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). The Price of Inequality. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

ISBN 978-0-393-34506-3.

Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

Večerník, J. (1996). Incomes in Central Europe: Distributions, Patterns and Perceptions. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(2), 101–122, https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600202