Politická ekonomie 2019, 67(1):65-81 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1217

Optimální způsob sjednání derivátu za přítomnosti rizika protistrany

Jan Šedivý
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Fakulta financí a účetnictví

Optimal Method of Entering a Derivative Contract in the Presence of Counterparty Risk

The paper deals with the optimal strategy for entering a derivative contract under existence of counterparty credit risk. Derivative contracts can be traded in three ways - bilaterally without any collateral agreement, bilaterally with collateral agreement or through a central counterparty. Our goal is to define rules for determining the most efficient way of trading. We take into account credit value adjustment, funding costs and capital costs related to regulatory requirements. In our empirical research, we focus on interest rate swaps with different maturities, specifically we analyse the impact of own and counterparty credit spreads on the overall costs. The results show higher efficiency of central clearing for investors with high creditworthiness. The costs of central clearing are very sensitive with respect to own credit spread and, therefore, the final decision depends on the actual relation with counterparty spread.

Keywords: counterparty credit risk, credit valuation adjustment, funding valuation adjustment, regulatory requirements.,
JEL classification: G13, G21, G32

Received: October 1, 2017; Accepted: June 4, 2018; Published: February 1, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šedivý, J. (2019). Optimal Method of Entering a Derivative Contract in the Presence of Counterparty Risk. Politická ekonomie67(1), 65-81. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1217
Download citation

References

  1. BCBS (2005). The Application of Basel II to Trading Activities and the Treatment of Double Default Effects. Basel: Bank for International Settlements. ISBN 92-9131-682-2´.
  2. BCBS (2010). Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking System. Basel: Bank for International Settlements Communications. ISBN 92-9131-859-0.
  3. BCBS (2015). Margin Requirements for Non-centrally Cleared Derivatives. Basel: Bank for International Settlements. ISBN 978-92-9197-065-0.
  4. Bianchetti, M. (2008). Two Curves, One Price: Pricing & Hedging Interest Rate Derivatives Decoupling Forwarding and Discounting Yield Curves, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1334356 Go to original source...
  5. Brigo, D., Morini, M., Pallavicini, A. (2013). Counterparty Credit Risk, Collateral and Funding: With Pricing Cases for All Asset Classes. New York: Wiley Finance. ISBN 978-0-470-74846-6. Go to original source...
  6. Burgard, C., Kjaer, M. (2011). In the Balance. Risk (November), 72-75, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1785262 Go to original source...
  7. Burgard, C., Kjaer, M. (2013). Funding Costs, Funding Strategies. Risk, 82-87, http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2027195 Go to original source...
  8. Canabarro, E., Duffie, D. (2003). Measuring and Marking Counterparty Risk, in Tilman, Leo M., ed., Asset/Liability Management of Financial Institutions. London: Euromoney Books Nestor House, pp. 122-134.
  9. Deloitte (2013). Counterparty Risk and CVA Survey. Dostupné z: https://www2.deloitte.com/con- tent/dam/Deloitte/lu/Documents/risk/dtt_en_counterpartyriskcvasurvey_06032013.pdf
  10. Green, A. D., Kenyon, C, Dennis, C. R. (2014). KVA: Capital Valuation Adjustment. Risk, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2400324 Go to original source...
  11. Gregory, J. (2012). Counterparty Credit Risk and Credit Value Adjustment: A Continuing Challange for Global Financial Markets. USA: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-118-31666-5. Go to original source...
  12. Gregory, Jon and German, Ilya, Closing Out the DVA Debate (September 27, 2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2790204 Go to original source...
  13. Paholok, I. (2015). Credit Value Adjustment and Economic Motivation to Trade on PXE. Prague Economic Papers, 24(03), 245-259, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.517 Go to original source...
  14. Piterbarg, V. (2010). Funding Beyond Discounting: Collateral Agreements and Derivatives Pricing. Risk, 23(2), 97-102.
  15. Pykhtin, M. (2012). Model Foundations of the Basel III Standardized CVA Charge. Risk 25(7), 60-66.
  16. Vasicek, O. (1977). An Equilibrium Characterization of the Term Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 177-188, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(77)90016-2 Go to original source...
  17. Zhu, S. and Pykhtin, M. (2007). A Guide to Modelling Counterparty Credit Risk. GARP Risk Review, 16-22, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1032522

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.