Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
TEORETICKÝ ČASOPIS • ISSN 0032-3233 (Print) • ISSN 2336-8225 (Online)

Politická ekonomie Vol. 66 No. 4

Vliv relativního příjmu na mezní sklon ke spotřebě – případ České republiky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1223

[plný text (PDF)]

Ondřej Badura

This paper examines the influence of relative income on the consumption function, particularly the issue of the precise quantification of the relationship between the propensity to consume and the position of the household in the income distribution represented just by relative income. Mainstream theory of consumption, though it is aware of this effect, for its focus primarily on the aggregate consumption, it doesn’t pay much attention to this. However, if it is possible to accurately describe and quantify this so-called relative income effect, it will mean a relevant contribution to the explanation of individual consumption patterns or consumption of income categories. The aim of this work is to find, describe and precisely quantify the impact of relative income on the average propensity to consume on the example of Czech households. To achieve this goal, we use a regression estimation of the dynamic panel using GMM, where the individual panels are set as income categories of households. The results achieved unambiguously confirm the validity of the initial assumption about the existence of functional dependence of the propensity to consume on the relative income and thus it fully supports the idea of interdependent concept of utility and consumption.

JEL klasifikace: C23, D11, D12, E21

Reference:
Ackerman, F. (1997). Consumed in Theory: Alternative Perspectives on the Economics of

Consumption. Journal of Economics Issues, 31(3), 651–664, https://doi.org/10.1080/002136

24.1997.11505958

Aizenman, J., Cheung, Y. W., Ito, H. (2016). The Interest Rate Effect on Private Saving: Alternative

Perspectives. NBER. Working Paper No. 22872, https://doi.org/10.3386/w22872

Alvarez-Cuadrado, F., Long, N. V. (2011). The Relative Income Hypothesis. Journal of Economic

Dynamics and Control, 35(9), 1489–1501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2011.03.012

Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence

and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297,

https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995). Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation

of Error-components Models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51, https://doi.

org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d

Arrow, K. J. (1950). Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumption Behavior. By James S.

Dueseneberry (book review). American Economic Review, 40(5), 906–911.

Artl, J., Čutková, J., Radkovský, Š. (2001). Analýza spotřební funkce v podmínkách ČR. Praha: Česká

národní banka. ISBN 8023879936.

Blundell, R. W., Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic

Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143, https://doi.org/10.1016/

s0304-4076(98)00009-8

Brůha, J., Hlaváček, M., Komárek, L. (2013). Dopady vývoje cen nemovitostí do finanční situace domácností, in Zpráva o finanční stabilitě 2012/2013. Praha: Česká národní banka. ISBN 978-80-87225-44-8.

Burza cenných papírů Praha (2017). Burzovní indexy. Praha: Burza cenných papírů Praha.

Dostupné z: https://www.pse.cz/indexy/hodnoty-indexu/historicka-data/?ID_NOTATION=

325088&ISIN=XC0009698371

Campbell, J. Y., Mankiw, N. G. (1989). Consumption, Income, and Interest Rates: Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, https://doi.org/10.3386/w2924

Carroll, Ch. D. (1997). Buffer-Stock Saving and the Life Cycle/Permanent Income Hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1), 1–56, https://doi.org/10.3386/w5788

Carroll, Ch. D. (2000). Why Do the Ritch Save So Much?, in Slemrod, J., ed., Does Atlas Shrug? The Economic Consequences of Taxing the Rich. New York: Harvard University Press.

ISBN 0-674-00154-0.

Česká národní banka (2017). PRIBOR (měsíční průměr) (%). Praha: Česká národní banka.

Dostupné z: https://www.cnb.cz/cnb/STAT.ARADY_PKG.PARAMETRY_SESTAVY?p_strid=

AEAB&p_sestuid=85&p_tab=1&p_lang=CS

Český statistický úřad (2017). Statistiky. Praha: Český statistický úřad. Dostupné z: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/statistiky

Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge:

Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674447509.

Dynan, K. E., Skinner, J., Zeldes, S. P. (2004). Do the Rich Save More? Journal od Political Economy, 112(2), 397–444, https://doi.org/10.1086/381475

Flavin, M. A. (1985). Excess Sensitivity of Consumption to Current Income: Liquidity Constraints or Myopia? Canadian Journal of Economics, 18(1), 117–136, https://doi.org/10.3386/w1341

Friedman, M. (1957). A Theory of the Consumption Function. New York: Princeton University

Press. ISBN 0-691-04182-2.

Galuščák, K., Hlaváč, P., Jakubík, P. (2016). Household Resilience to Adverse Macroeconomic Shocks: Evidence from Czech Microdata. International Review of Applied Economics, 33(3), 377–402, https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2015.1105937

Hall, R. E. (1978). Stochastic Implication of the Life Cycle – Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 86(6), 971–987, https://doi.org/10.1086/260724

Hall, R. E., Mishkin, F. S. (1982). The Sensitivity of Consumption to Transitory Income: Estimates from Panel Data on Households. Econometrica, 50(2), 461–481, https://doi.org/10.3386/w0505

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.

Kuznets, S., Epstein, L., Jenks, E. (1946). National Product Since 1869. New York: National Bureau of Economics Research. ISBN 0-87014-045-0.

Loayza, N., Schmidt-Hebbel, K., Servén, L. (2000). What Drives Private Saving across

the World. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(2), 165–181, https://doi.org/10.1162/003465300558678

Mason, R. (2000). The Social Significance of Consumption: James Duesenberry’s Contribution to Consumer Theory. Journal of Economic Issues, 34(3), 553–572, https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2000.11506294

Modigliani, F., Brumberg, R. (1954). Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An

Interpretation of Cross-Section Data, in Kurihara, K., ed., Post-Keynesian Economics. New

Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0415607896.

Nikbin, B., Panahi, S. (2016). Estimation of Private Consumption Function of Iran: Autoregressive Distributed Lag Approach to Co-integration. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(2), 653–659.

Palley, T. I. (2010). The Relative Income Theory of Consumption: A Synthetic Keynes -

Duesenberry - Friedman Model. Review of Political Economy, 22(1), 41–56, https://doi.

org/10.1080/09538250903391954

Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: Macmillian.

Zeldes, S. P. (1989). Consumption and Liquidity Constraints: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 97(2), 305–346, https://doi.org/10.1086/261605